Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark  (Read 126095 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dexter

  • Patriotism, the last refuge of the scoundrel. -- Irish, darnit!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 975
  • Last login:February 01, 2024, 04:36:19 pm
  • "MAKE POVERTY HISTORY......."
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #480 on: March 02, 2005, 08:02:56 am »
Yep, if I had it for the last cocktail I built I would have devoted the front panel to a spinner, trackball and analog stick, or....not having a control panel at the front at all, you could change the dimensions of the cabinet to incorporate a bigger monitor without changing the overall space it takes up.


NiN^_^NiN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • Last login:October 01, 2020, 10:28:26 pm
  • Oh yeah Baby. I put on my robe and wizard hat
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #481 on: March 02, 2005, 08:34:26 am »
Who is going to trust this guy?  Other companies?  Please.  He committed a crime by filing the application.

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 makes it a crime to: 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) make any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States. Your lie does not even have to be made directly to an employee of the national government as long as it is "within the jurisdiction" of the federal bureaucracy. [ripped from a site]

 :police: :police:And here is the crime in all of it's glory!! :police: :police:



Do you know whats funny?

If he won you could contest it cause he didn't fill out the form properly

he didn't state 04 just 4 which isn't standard which means it could be thrown out  :P

Just a thought  ;D

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #482 on: March 02, 2005, 08:35:17 am »
Boycott Arcade Legends and Ultracade!
[/b]

Application still "not assigned" to an examiner...

daywane

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2570
  • Last login:December 26, 2024, 11:02:08 am
  • GRRRR!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #483 on: March 02, 2005, 08:57:00 am »
Boycott Arcade Legends and Ultracade!
[/b]

Application still "not assigned" to an examiner...
I don't think any examiner wants to ... ;)
I would come to think about it
declined.....

RetroJames

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2264
  • Last login:December 10, 2021, 05:26:38 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #484 on: March 02, 2005, 09:04:26 am »
ANd actually, THAT idea deserves a full thread. A double image cocktail mode for playing non cocktail horizontal games on vertical cocktails is something that A LOT of people would probably really enjoy.

I would really like to see a "dumb terminal" bartop project.  I mentioned this in the Projects section under the NeoGeo bartop.  The idea being that you create a second bartop that is a dumb terminal with a monitor that mirrors the fist bartop's image.  The controls would be wired to the first and simply be player two.  Then you could have real head-to-head action on fighter bartop cabinets.  "Hey!  You Sunk My MegaMan!"

IntruderAlert

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
  • Last login:May 02, 2007, 09:10:59 am
  • Chicken.. Fight Like A Robot
    • Intruder Alert
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #485 on: March 02, 2005, 01:21:39 pm »
I predict that someone will take a hard drive image out of an ultracade, crack the security on it, and then release the image to the world.
I predict that someone will take a hard drive image out of an ultracade, crack the security on it, and then find out that it's really M.A.M.E.  ;)

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #486 on: March 02, 2005, 03:54:12 pm »
I was thinking about DF iRoms program.  And I'm wondering...  I think half of the companies that made games that are in MAME are long gone.  So who would profit from that sale of that rom?  DF?  Or would that game never be available on iROMS because there was no legal enity that one could sign an publishing agreement with? 

If it wasn't for MAME, most of these games would have been forgotten about a long time ago.

RetroJames

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2264
  • Last login:December 10, 2021, 05:26:38 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #487 on: March 02, 2005, 04:00:17 pm »
I was thinking about DF iRoms program.

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #488 on: March 02, 2005, 04:01:04 pm »
I was thinking about DF iRoms program.

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #489 on: March 02, 2005, 04:04:37 pm »
Considering the amount of games and bootlegs in MAME.  It'll take a long time too figure out who currently owns what.

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #490 on: March 02, 2005, 04:14:49 pm »
But you gotta start somewhere.  And I wouldn't even worry about the bootlegs.  The parents will get you most of what people will want.

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #491 on: March 02, 2005, 04:18:01 pm »
So the question is.. why would publishers sell to DF when they can release a "10-in-1" joystick/rom combo and sell thousands of them and cut out the middle man?

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #492 on: March 02, 2005, 04:19:52 pm »
Because that's a different market.  how many BYOACers are going to hook up each of those 10-in-1s to their arcade cabinet?

IntruderAlert

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
  • Last login:May 02, 2007, 09:10:59 am
  • Chicken.. Fight Like A Robot
    • Intruder Alert
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #493 on: March 02, 2005, 05:21:50 pm »

Thenasty

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4419
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:11:32 pm
    • Thenasty's Arcademania Horizontal/Vertical monitor setup.
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #494 on: March 02, 2005, 05:35:14 pm »
a game running on it...
Thenasty's Arcademania Horizontal/Vertical setup.
http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=26696.0

Free VGA Breakout Cable
http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=38228.0

Ultimate All in One Coin Mech write up (Make your own)
http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=19200.0

scatter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
  • Last login:December 07, 2005, 06:09:09 am
  • Don't read this! Drat, too late.
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #495 on: March 02, 2005, 06:20:57 pm »
About the Ultracade HD Image. Just FYI. The one I dissected  few monthas ago used a propriery OS called JoshuaOS. An image of the drive was easy enough but  the kernel was over my head to figure out. The whole thing (HD) was locked to the hardware via key generated based on your hardware and that tied to your serial and your unlock code. Pretty standard security except for the OS.

b
I am scat

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #496 on: March 02, 2005, 07:10:10 pm »
lol.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2005, 07:14:27 pm by Crazy Cooter »

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #497 on: March 02, 2005, 07:18:42 pm »
That link says "System99" is the same as Ultracade.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2005, 07:47:14 pm by Crazy Cooter »

Shape D.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1602
  • Last login:July 05, 2012, 06:17:57 pm
  • >Look at me, I'm a Newbie<
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #498 on: March 02, 2005, 07:27:47 pm »
Lets see what we can do about pulling the plug...
If you were a woman I'd kiss you.
Hey Baby, Have you ever met a Newbie with 38 pages of previous posts before? Do you Want to?

emdkay

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 459
  • Last login:July 10, 2019, 09:53:25 pm
  • Authentic & Repro Arcade Artwork & Bartop Cabinets
    • EMDKAY - Authentic & Reproduction Arcade Artwork
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #499 on: March 02, 2005, 08:35:22 pm »
and you all thought this thread was moot  ;D
EMDKAY.net - Your Original Source for Authentic & Reproduction Arcade Artwork, Arcade & Mame Marquees, and Home Arcade Bartop Cabinets
Improve the lives of children with toys and games through Emdkay & Child's Play! - See specially marked products.

btoddkelley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
  • Last login:October 20, 2013, 04:52:05 pm
  • I want to Build My Own Arcade Controls!!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #500 on: March 02, 2005, 08:37:37 pm »
Did you guys read about that OS? I wonder what that would be like on a mame cab? 1sec boot time sounds NICE!
Todd
For it is not enough to have a good mind, rather the main thing is to apply it well.

- Descartes

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #501 on: March 02, 2005, 10:56:35 pm »
Did you guys read about that OS? I wonder what that would be like on a mame cab? 1sec boot time sounds NICE!
Todd
I'm going to try and install this, this weekend...

JoshuaOS

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #502 on: March 02, 2005, 11:09:10 pm »
Hey!!

Here is a FE that runs like Ultracades FE!!!

http://www.mameworld.net/ultrastyle/

daywane

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2570
  • Last login:December 26, 2024, 11:02:08 am
  • GRRRR!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #503 on: March 02, 2005, 11:37:40 pm »
wow with 2000+ posts you just found out about that FE.   :D

Thats funny.
I like it but never got it up and running.  I should try again.

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #504 on: March 03, 2005, 12:21:18 am »
wow with 2000+ posts you just found out about that FE.

Havok

  • Keeper of the __Blue_Stars___
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4530
  • Last login:July 11, 2025, 01:29:48 am
  • Insufficient facts always invite danger.
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #505 on: March 03, 2005, 01:02:52 am »
Here's a good read:

http://www.copyright.gov/1201/

ROMs are legal - if you own the original equipment. I point you to this paragraph:

"(3) Computer programs and video games distributed in formats that have become obsolete and which require the original media or hardware as a condition of access. A format shall be considered obsolete if the machine or system necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace."

There are grey areas, to be sure, however it can certainly be argued that they are obsolete (sigh!)

And my two cents about iROMS - not me, not now, not ever.

Star ROMs - You bet!

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #506 on: March 03, 2005, 02:26:08 am »
And also note, the releases are NOT the same programs. They are always different. The Ms. Pac-Mans and Galaga's released in 2001 contain new code and are not the same programs.

If you can't buy it brand new from the distributor or obtain it easily through normal distribution chains then it is obsolete. Note the idea of normal distribution chains? That doesn't mean buying that (possibly bootleg, could be broken, probably will break next week) PCB from gameZDude69 (Feedback 82 percent) on ebay.

The lovely lovely part of that part of the law is that fact that it does not define the hardware. I can no longer render "Galaga" because my cabinet has fallen apart, molded, and rusted away to the point where the only thing left is the marquee rail, but I can still render the game thanks to exception number 3.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #507 on: March 03, 2005, 08:19:41 am »
Hmm, I just perused Ultracades offerings in the recent Happ catalog.

They are completely missing the boat.

Their universal conversion kit is $1495.

If they could get a non-commercial (home use, all games locked to free play) Universal conversion kit out there for $995 then they would sell, sell, sell. People pay $695 now for the crappy 39 in 1.

Most of the builder's that are competing with them would start using their products instead of Mame.

At $1500 the amateur builders can't turn a profit using their kits. I could get about $2000 for a nice clean 25" Ultracade equipped cabinet, and probably $1800 for a 19" one. But with their current kit prices I couldn't turn a profit. But if they had a non-commercial kit (which would be cheaper for them for sure, their arcade legends ones are non-commercial and are cheaper) for $1000 I could toss business their way and so could a lot of the other part time builders.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

Edgedamage

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • Last login:October 06, 2018, 12:21:23 am
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #508 on: March 03, 2005, 08:51:04 am »
About the Ultracade HD Image. Just FYI. The one I dissected
Curls in the squat rack !?!?!

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #509 on: March 03, 2005, 09:06:19 am »
... rusted away to the point where the only thing left is the marquee rail, but I can still render the game thanks to exception number 3.
LOL.  That's what I've been saying too.  Nobody has shown that the ROM's are illegal.  If they are, how much of the original do you need in order to play your "backup"?  The courts have never dealt with it.

Anyhow...
With all this interest in JoshuaOS, make sure you discuss with him the Foley situation.  Ask him to pull his license.

Boycott Ultracade & Arcade Legends & Chicago Gaming & System99 & HyperWare & Nextune!  This list is getting long.  Why does Foley have to keep changing his business names?  Taxes?  There's something with this...

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #510 on: March 03, 2005, 09:23:54 am »

btoddkelley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
  • Last login:October 20, 2013, 04:52:05 pm
  • I want to Build My Own Arcade Controls!!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #511 on: March 03, 2005, 09:57:36 am »
GG I would really like to hear about your experience using Joshua, I would love to dump M$ on the cab, especially if I could still transfer files over my wireless network.

Thanks
Todd
For it is not enough to have a good mind, rather the main thing is to apply it well.

- Descartes

IntruderAlert

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
  • Last login:May 02, 2007, 09:10:59 am
  • Chicken.. Fight Like A Robot
    • Intruder Alert
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #512 on: March 03, 2005, 10:29:19 am »
Suppose the following:

1) - Ultracade is actually based on M.A.M.E. and includes M.A.M.E. code
2) - In order to hide this fact, David R. Foley builds some serious copy protection into his systems and begins selling his arcade machines.
3) - Ultracade begins to grow and actually make a nice profit
4) - David R. Foley becomes even more concerned over the possibility of M.A.M.E. code being discovered in his arcade machines and the resulting possibility of his being sued by the original M.A.M.E. creators for his unauthorized use of M.A.M.E. code.
5) - David R. Foley sees an opportunity for leverage against the M.A.M.E. creators in that the M.A.M.E. name and logo have never been trademarked and quickly files for the M.A.M.E. trademark himself.
6) - David R. Foley agrees to return ownership of the M.A.M.E. name and logo to the original M.A.M.E. creators in exchange for the rights to use M.A.M.E. code in all of his arcade machines and thus avoids the possibility of ever being sued by the M.A.M.E. creators
« Last Edit: March 03, 2005, 10:32:11 am by IntruderAlert »

RayB

  • I'm not wearing pants! HA!
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11279
  • Last login:July 10, 2025, 01:33:58 am
  • There's my post
    • RayB.com
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #513 on: March 03, 2005, 11:18:32 am »
Suppose the following:
...

Sounds plausible.

By the way, I like your whole board persona there. Name, avatar, motto..  ;D 
NO MORE!!

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #514 on: March 03, 2005, 12:04:11 pm »
Given the fact that the Capcom emulator that is included on their CD's is based on MAME.  And that fact that DF is connected with Capcom as his Ultracade emulates Capcom games.  It's highly possible that DF took the exisiting Capcom interface (MAME) and tweaked it to suite his needs.


Santoro

  • Purveyor of Shiny Arcade Goodness
  • Santoro
  • Trade Count: (+32)
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3055
  • Last login:July 14, 2025, 03:43:29 pm
  • Boycott Quarters!!!
    • ArcadeReplay!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #515 on: March 03, 2005, 01:27:22 pm »
Reading through this thread it occurred to me what poetic justice it would be if the man that was trying to steal Mame IP was put out of business by thieves that stole and distributed his software.

One can only Dream.   :)

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #516 on: March 03, 2005, 01:35:12 pm »
5) - David R. Foley sees an opportunity for leverage against the M.A.M.E. creators in that the M.A.M.E. name and logo have never been trademarked and quickly files for the M.A.M.E. trademark himself.
6) - David R. Foley agrees to return ownership of the M.A.M.E. name and logo to the original M.A.M.E. creators in exchange for the rights to use M.A.M.E. code in all of his arcade machines and thus avoids the possibility of ever being sued by the M.A.M.E. creators

Ok, so we are at point 5.  5 has to fail so 6 doesn't take place :)

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #517 on: March 03, 2005, 01:40:58 pm »
Given the fact that the Capcom emulator that is included on their CD's is based on MAME.

GGKoul

  • Cheesecake Apprentice
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4707
  • Last login:May 26, 2024, 02:06:23 am
  • I was once a big man!! -4700 posts later...
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #518 on: March 03, 2005, 02:46:39 pm »
Given the fact that the Capcom emulator that is included on their CD's is based on MAME.

mr.Curmudgeon

  • It's going to hurt your brain. A lot.
  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3833
  • Last login:October 11, 2021, 07:15:49 pm
  • Huzzah!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #519 on: March 03, 2005, 02:55:28 pm »
Quote
This place/guy sounds like a reasonable fellow...
Lets see what we can do about pulling the plug..

Or why don't we just see what it'd cost to get our own license of JoshuaOS? Don't know what his minimum volume requirement would be, but maybe purchasing the license would help reverse engineer Ultracade?

We could pool the money through donations. I'd throw some money toward this, for sure. Or maybe this isn't even a sensible suggestion?!?  :)  I'm not really a development guy...


From the site:
JoshuaOS
« Last Edit: March 03, 2005, 03:00:57 pm by mr.Curmudgeon »