Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark  (Read 126237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chris

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4574
  • Last login:September 21, 2019, 04:59:49 pm
    • Chris's MAME Cabinet
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #440 on: February 28, 2005, 09:38:58 pm »
I don't think going to war here is the answer.  Look, the MAME team is on it... I think we should let them do what they need to do.  If foley does what he says and assigns the trademark to the MAME team, all is well.  What his original intentions are are not particularly relevant.  It may be a factor for anyone planning a purchase, but let's be honest: even if he was the greatest guy in the world, we're not his target market, so saying "we'll never consider a purcase from you" means nothing.  And if his iROMs service goes forward, that's a good thing for the community, even if we refuse to use it.

Let's all just stand down for a moment, take a deep breath and see where Aaron and Haze run with it.  If they need our help, they know we got their back.

--Chris
--Chris
DOSCab/WinCab Jukebox: http://www.dwjukebox.com

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #441 on: February 28, 2005, 09:57:52 pm »
Who is going to trust this guy?  Other companies?  Please.  He committed a crime by filing the application.

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 makes it a crime to: 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) make any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States. Your lie does not even have to be made directly to an employee of the national government as long as it is "within the jurisdiction" of the federal bureaucracy. [ripped from a site]

 :police: :police:And here is the crime in all of it's glory!! :police: :police:



Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #442 on: February 28, 2005, 10:01:21 pm »
Notice the date... merry friggen X-mas.

RetroJames

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2264
  • Last login:December 10, 2021, 05:26:38 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #443 on: February 28, 2005, 10:29:01 pm »
One note, I am not a lawyer but that statement says, "I affirm....no (other entity) has the right to use this mark in commerce..blah, blah."

By the letter of the law and IP rights, maybe the mamedevs and/or the artist who made the logo do not "have the right to use the mark in commerce" meaning, maybe because they did not file first, they lost thier right (by the law).

Just playing devil's advocate here.  Lawyers feel free to chime in????

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #444 on: February 28, 2005, 10:54:10 pm »
You can establish rights to a mark based on "legitimate use" of the mark without ever registering.  It just complicates things if some doofus tries to register it.  That creates a burdon on the USPTO system (and judicail system).  That's why the applicant has to sign the above.  The applicant faces jail/fines/both if it is determined the application was filed in "bad faith".

danny_galaga

  • Grand high prophet of the holy noodle.
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8522
  • Last login:July 18, 2025, 01:09:20 am
  • because the mail never stops
    • dans cocktail lounge
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #445 on: March 01, 2005, 12:58:29 am »
Nobody would be able to protect a trademark on that. lol.

but then bill gates seems to think the word 'windows' is his alone. oh, nad probably the word 'word'!!

word,
danny.


ROUGHING UP THE SUSPECT SINCE 1981

1UP

  • Token Junkie
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2081
  • Last login:November 11, 2014, 01:37:18 am
  • Yes, that is a joystick in my pocket.
    • 1UPArcade
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #446 on: March 01, 2005, 01:21:42 am »
And if his iROMs service goes forward, that's a good thing for the community, even if we refuse to use it.

Could be a bad thing--especially if no one uses it.  If iRoms goes down in flames, it would be unlikely anyone would try anything like it again (creating a legal source of roms.)

"So you say you need investors, Mr. StarROMs?  I don't know, remember what happened to that iRoms thing..."   :(

Free resource for building your own rotating control panels!

My other job...


Tommy Boy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 113
  • Last login:April 13, 2010, 04:13:56 am
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #447 on: March 01, 2005, 01:38:38 am »
And if his iROMs service goes forward, that's a good thing for the community, even if we refuse to use it.

Could be a bad thing--especially if no one uses it.  If iRoms goes down in flames, it would be unlikely anyone would try anything like it again (creating a legal source of roms.)

"So you say you need investors, Mr. StarROMs?  I don't know, remember what happened to that iRoms thing..."   :(
I agree.  The other issue here is that this guy has apparently no capability to formulate and execute a coherent strategy.  I ask: Why would one pi$$ down the leg of the very community which is the target market for iRoms?  This guy's business acumen leaves something to be desired.

What do you want to bet that he uses this iRoms service as an excuse to chase down "illegal" roms and prices games so that they won't "compete" with his Ultracase packages?  In the end this will be a poorly executed fiasco that COULD HAVE BEEN a good idea but instead gets killed by a greedy goon that doesn't realize what he's got.

If he's smart he'll realize that iRoms could be a much bigger money maker than building cabs.  I'll bet he gets it backwards and kills iRoms by trying to use it to drive off competition to Ultracade.  Moron.

RetroJames

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2264
  • Last login:December 10, 2021, 05:26:38 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #448 on: March 01, 2005, 08:24:12 am »
Fear:

iRoms service established

iRoms somehow encrypted to prevent them running on MAME

iRoms only run on Ultracade hardware/software

Ayone using MAME MUST be running illegal roms

Now that mamedevs are "in the open", pursue mame as illegal

Note Nintendo states that emulators are the evil of mankind in no uncertain terms

Note DF has already made statements to the effect that "since mame emus capcom, it is an illegal sf package"

Thank you , come again.

THe good news...all vectrex games are legal :-\

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #449 on: March 01, 2005, 08:51:41 am »
Exactly... illegal "by default".

Digital Rights Management.

Your ROM download can only be used on 1 cabinet...

Boycott Ultracade & Arcade Legends

stevejt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 350
  • Last login:January 01, 2022, 01:21:32 pm
  • stevejt.com
    • My site
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #450 on: March 01, 2005, 09:24:08 am »
Forgive me if I'm wrong.  Everyone keeps saying MAME is going to be illegal.  I have seen it said that arcade boards can ONLY be legally backed up from an original board.  (You can't use someone elses ROM to fix a board even if you actually own.)  So, by that, MAME can NEVER be declared illegal software on it's own.  I can HAVE it, and I can back up my boards, with the intent of only repairing them if needed.  (I know we can't all burn all our own ROMs, but the possibility has been put there for us.
Does that sound reasonable?

Steve

(I own about 35 boards, I WOULD buy the hardware to back up if the ROMs weren't already available).

RayB

  • I'm not wearing pants! HA!
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11279
  • Last login:July 10, 2025, 01:33:58 am
  • There's my post
    • RayB.com
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #451 on: March 01, 2005, 09:33:09 am »
BYOAC's longest thread ever? When will this thread lose momentum?
NO MORE!!

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #452 on: March 01, 2005, 09:35:22 am »
Ayone using MAME MUST be running illegal roms

Now that mamedevs are "in the open", pursue mame as illegal

Note DF has already made statements to the effect that "since mame emus capcom, it is an illegal sf package"

Can't happen.

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #453 on: March 01, 2005, 09:37:21 am »
BYOAC's longest thread ever? When will this thread lose momentum?


Not yet

RayB

  • I'm not wearing pants! HA!
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11279
  • Last login:July 10, 2025, 01:33:58 am
  • There's my post
    • RayB.com
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #454 on: March 01, 2005, 09:56:10 am »
3) Hanaho Capcom CD, you can legally run those Capcom games which happens to run on a modified version of mame32.

You sure about that? When RetroFX GnG was active we had a couple discussions with Hanaho, and I'm pretty sure their emulator was written by Larry Bank. In fact, Larry's core emulator is what RetroFX GnG was built off of (with Larry's permission).
NO MORE!!

APFelon

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 564
  • Last login:July 04, 2024, 08:51:53 pm
  • Posts: 5922
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #455 on: March 01, 2005, 10:49:59 am »
Here is a question I haven't seen brought up:

How will this affect the arcade vendor industry as a whole? Many companies "rip" ROMs from their original PCBs in order to have a backup in case a ROM goes bad in the field. Of course, if the PCB gets sold (either in a machine or as a PCB) or gets discarded, the backups remain  and are often used for home repair or conversion. In the seven years I worked in the business, no one thought squat about it.

So what I am looking for is comments on the repercussions of this newfound application of the DMCA on businesses that have been practicing this for decades, AND the real-life applications of the law. Preservation of 25-year-old electronics often depend on this. Will this practice be forced to fall in to oblivion, or will it be "grandfathered" in?

APf

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #456 on: March 01, 2005, 11:04:37 am »
3) Hanaho Capcom CD, you can legally run those Capcom games which happens to run on a modified version of mame32.

You sure about that? When RetroFX GnG was active we had a couple discussions with Hanaho, and I'm pretty sure their emulator was written by Larry Bank. In fact, Larry's core emulator is what RetroFX GnG was built off of (with Larry's permission).


Yes, I hav played the hanaho capcom cd.

SirPeale

  • Green Mountain Man
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12963
  • Last login:August 04, 2023, 09:51:57 am
  • Arcade Repair in New England
    • Arcade Game and Other Coin-Op Projects
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #457 on: March 01, 2005, 11:09:33 am »
BYOAC's longest thread ever? When will this thread lose momentum?


Not yet

Ah, but consider how long those threads took to get to the length they are.  Within 18 hours THIS thread had 8500 views. 

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #458 on: March 01, 2005, 11:20:13 am »
Actually, the IE 6 cookie problem thread on the oldsite grew pretty quickly considering anyone who was using IE 6 had the problem :)

Gunstar Hero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:September 28, 2014, 01:51:17 am
  • Back in action!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #459 on: March 01, 2005, 11:31:56 am »
The Hanaho Capcom runs on a version of MAME called TrueMAME that was approved by the MAME Team due to the liscensed status of the ROMS IIRC...

As for Mr. Ultracade (TM), he's a moron. He wants the arcade sized ipod. Apple created that market. UltraCON's just trying to rip off their plan/bizarre naming scheme. Nice. That's integrity.

It's funny too... because SO many guys on this board would buy ROMs from the ass. So many guys would rather be "legit" rather than using legally questionable ROM sets.

But why kill other cab makers? He thinks he's being smooth. It's like, he's trying to do a new TV show and doesn't want anyone to sell TV sets except him.  Seems like he'd be limiting the audience to me.

And remember, it's too late to kill MAME. The program exists. We all have it. We all have ROMS. Unless Mr. Ultracade (TM) has something AMAZING up his sleeve that can play all the games that we crave that MAME can't, he can jam it.  :P


SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #460 on: March 01, 2005, 12:20:12 pm »
And remember, it's too late to kill MAME. The program exists. We all have it. We all have ROMS. Unless Mr. Ultracade (TM) has something AMAZING up his sleeve that can play all the games that we crave that MAME can't, he can jam it.

tetsujin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 222
  • Last login:April 10, 2007, 05:51:25 pm
  • My controls will have programmable button labels.
    • My Homepage
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #461 on: March 01, 2005, 12:27:32 pm »
And remember, it's too late to kill MAME. The program exists. We all have it. We all have ROMS. Unless Mr. Ultracade (TM) has something AMAZING up his sleeve that can play all the games that we crave that MAME can't, he can jam it.  :P

Not entirely true.  I've been trying to find a program which I know was deemed copyright infringement and it was an open source project call freecraft, a warcraft like RTS.  I have been searching all over the net for the source for that.  Blizzard has actively shut down sites that mention it.

Freecraft is still in Debian...  It's not too hard to find.
---GEC

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #462 on: March 01, 2005, 12:40:39 pm »
Rally, I tried looking through rpms and debs.  I must have missed it.  Anyway.  Point is still it is hard to get at it.

IntruderAlert

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 873
  • Last login:May 02, 2007, 09:10:59 am
  • Chicken.. Fight Like A Robot
    • Intruder Alert
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #463 on: March 01, 2005, 12:42:40 pm »
And remember, it's too late to kill MAME. The program exists. We all have it. We all have ROMS. Unless Mr. Ultracade (TM) has something AMAZING up his sleeve that can play all the games that we crave that MAME can't, he can jam it.  :P

Not entirely true.  I've been trying to find a program which I know was deemed copyright infringement and it was an open source project call freecraft, a warcraft like RTS.  I have been searching all over the net for the source for that.  Blizzard has actively shut down sites that mention it.
Maybe try contacting the guys at  FCGP

colmore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Last login:March 01, 2005, 09:14:56 pm
  • I want to build my own arcade controls!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #464 on: March 01, 2005, 01:18:55 pm »
Despite the fact that this guy is obviously a jerk and approaching the whole thing in a completely wrongheaded way, there is a legitimate point at the core of all of this nonsense.

The cabs that are sold on ebay and elsewhere are most definitely advertising on the ability to play pirated ROMS.  Virtually every MAME capable cabinet on ebay loudly proclaims its ability to play THOUSANDS of arcade and console games.  Nowhere on the page will it give the caveat that to play thousands of games, you should own thousands of JAMMA boards and cartidges and have your own personal ROM extractor.  I doubt a cabinet has ever been purchased by someone who did not put at least several hundred illegal roms on it within a day of getting it.

Imagine if MAME existed but roms were somehow only available to legal owners.  Would people pay $2000 for a cabinet that could only play a dozen or so legal games?  Almost certainly not.  The Ultracade is being undercut by competitors who are tacitly relying on theft to complete the products that they are selling.  They don't have to say "Here's where to go get those 10,000 ROMS I mentioned" they know people will be able to find a .torrent or use other P2P.  In fact, even if the roms were available at say, $30 per, this would still cripple the market for MAME cabinets.

I for one will fully admit to the fact that I'm building my cabinet for the exclusive purpose of playing ROMS that I have no legal right to whatsoever.  I don't own a single original board, nor do I plan to.  If MAME weren't available I might someday (not now, I don't have the cash) consider buying an Ultracade or similar multi-game cabinet, but with the ROMs available, there's no way I'd ever buy one.

Now does this mean that he's entitled to take the legal steps he's taking?  Almost certainly not.  However, his point that he is competing with stolen goods is legitimate.

stevejt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 350
  • Last login:January 01, 2022, 01:21:32 pm
  • stevejt.com
    • My site
Re: MAME Trademarked by Ultracade
« Reply #465 on: March 01, 2005, 01:23:55 pm »
Can't you legally sue him for a loss of bussiness?

stevejt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 350
  • Last login:January 01, 2022, 01:21:32 pm
  • stevejt.com
    • My site
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #466 on: March 01, 2005, 01:31:31 pm »


Now does this mean that he's entitled to take the legal steps he's taking?

APFelon

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 564
  • Last login:July 04, 2024, 08:51:53 pm
  • Posts: 5922
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #467 on: March 01, 2005, 01:34:48 pm »


The cabs that are sold on ebay and elsewhere are most definitely advertising on the ability to play pirated ROMS.  Virtually every MAME capable cabinet on ebay loudly proclaims its ability to play THOUSANDS of arcade and console games.  Nowhere on the page will it give the caveat that to play thousands of games, you should own thousands of JAMMA boards and cartidges and have your own personal ROM extractor.  I doubt a cabinet has ever been purchased by someone who did not put at least several hundred illegal roms on it within a day of getting it.

That's swell, but how does this apply to Philip's 642 DVD player (it can play Divx and Xvid encoded movies, the pirate's favorite... AND can be found at any local Target store) and CD players that also play MP3s directly off of a CD?

What if I sold an empty cabinet and claim that it is "perfect for a MAME project"? Am I somehow supporting piracy? Am I somehow responsible if the new owner makes a MAME cabinet out of the materials I supplied, even if I mounted a motherboard and HDD on the side?

I can understand your argument; it is the same one that gun control advocates use when they sue gun manufacturers. I just think that it is too abstract of a thought process to hold up any serious logical scrutiny. (a material is supplied to a person who uses it illegally or maliciously, therefore the supplier is responsible for the action of another).

APf

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #468 on: March 01, 2005, 01:46:21 pm »
The cabs that are sold on ebay and elsewhere are most definitely advertising on the ability to play pirated ROMS.

Fat_Trucker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 306
  • Last login:September 08, 2010, 11:44:22 am
  • I want to build my own arcade controls!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #469 on: March 01, 2005, 01:47:51 pm »
Quote
Now does this mean that he's entitled to take the legal steps he's taking?
I didn't touch it....honest!

Crazy Cooter

  • Senator Cooter was heard today telling the entire congressional body to STFU...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2041
  • Last login:June 05, 2025, 12:39:19 pm
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #470 on: March 01, 2005, 01:52:38 pm »
Colmore, have you ever burned a cd?
« Last Edit: March 01, 2005, 01:56:06 pm by Crazy Cooter »

SirPoonga

  • Puck'em Up
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8188
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:37:24 pm
  • The Bears Still Suck!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #471 on: March 01, 2005, 02:19:10 pm »

Shape D.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1602
  • Last login:July 05, 2012, 06:17:57 pm
  • >Look at me, I'm a Newbie<
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #472 on: March 01, 2005, 02:22:51 pm »
So D.F.'s parents suck?  : ;)
Hey Baby, Have you ever met a Newbie with 38 pages of previous posts before? Do you Want to?

fredster

  • Grand Prophet of Arcadeology
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2267
  • Last login:February 16, 2019, 04:28:53 pm
  • It's all good!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #473 on: March 01, 2005, 05:37:54 pm »
this is like the biggest thread ever.

King of the Flying Monkeys from the Dark Side

Shape D.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1602
  • Last login:July 05, 2012, 06:17:57 pm
  • >Look at me, I'm a Newbie<
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #474 on: March 01, 2005, 05:55:22 pm »
this is like the biggest thread ever.


Nope, As of this post. Tied for second.
Hey Baby, Have you ever met a Newbie with 38 pages of previous posts before? Do you Want to?

DrewKaree

  • - AHOTW - Pompous revolving door windbag *YOINKER*
  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9740
  • Last login:May 15, 2021, 05:31:18 pm
  • HAH! Nice one!
    • A lifelong project
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #475 on: March 01, 2005, 06:19:19 pm »
Shape, I think SirP's point was - yes, Foley's parents suck, and we should all download a copy of Korn's remake, burn it to CD, and mail it to him and let nature take its course

 ;D


I offer up the following quote, which you can clearly paraphrase to fit the above solution:

"Dishes are DONE, maaan!"
You’re always in control of your behavior. Sometimes you just control yourself
in ways that you later wish you hadn’t

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #476 on: March 02, 2005, 03:54:16 am »
I have a prediction. A lot of people in the arcade world are also in the emulation world as well. I predict that someone will take a hard drive image out of an ultracade, crack the security on it, and then release the image to the world.

If that someone is smart they would get it circulating in Taiwan, China, and Japan first, by the time it hits the ENGLISH warez/roms scene it will be too late, the bootleg Ultracade kits will already be coming out of the factory.

I mean if he wants to fight piracy and illegal competion, then let him do it. Operators have never had a problem buying bootleg boards. They didn't have a problem with it in 1980, and the last operator I did a deal with runs more bootleg boards than real ones.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

Dexter

  • Patriotism, the last refuge of the scoundrel. -- Irish, darnit!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 975
  • Last login:February 01, 2024, 04:36:19 pm
  • "MAKE POVERTY HISTORY......."
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #477 on: March 02, 2005, 05:39:32 am »
Don't the ultracade cocktails have a dual screen mirror mode? whereby fighting games can be played at either end instead of you needing controls at the front of the cab? Would be a terrible shame if an image of THAT software made it out onto the internet  :)

By the way guys, theres no official version of mame that can do the same thing, is there?

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #478 on: March 02, 2005, 05:41:46 am »
Don't the ultracade cocktails have a dual screen mirror mode? whereby fighting games can be played at either end instead of you needing controls at the front of the cab? Would be a terrible shame if an image of THAT software made it out onto the internet  :)

By the way guys, theres no official version of mame that can do the same thing, is there?

I don't THINK there are any versions of Mame that can do that, but why not ask one of the devlopers around here, it sounds like it would be incredibly simple, just a custom video mode.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Discussion: Ultracade and the Mame Trademark
« Reply #479 on: March 02, 2005, 05:45:17 am »
ANd actually, THAT idea deserves a full thread. A double image cocktail mode for playing non cocktail horizontal games on vertical cocktails is something that A LOT of people would probably really enjoy.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.