Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread  (Read 23315 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #80 on: February 05, 2015, 03:38:00 pm »
What's with all this "Do I Offend???" If you wanna be on the board, be on the board. Your goal is to make sure quality work gets rewarded, not making Peace in the Middle East.  :angry:*












*That was a recreation of the evil yotsuya from Episode 30, "The Enemy Within".
« Last Edit: February 05, 2015, 04:04:01 pm by yotsuya »
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

wp34

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4794
  • Last login:April 10, 2022, 09:48:19 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #81 on: February 05, 2015, 03:57:42 pm »


I wonder if Im a deal breaker for anyone.  If so, speak up

I'm waiting for you to ---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- or get off the pot before I decide to ---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- or get off the pot...

All jokes aside, I've got to ask the same.

Anyone waiting to commit based on whether I deuce or bail?

LT if YOU are someone's deal-breaker I'd rather not see them on the board. Just do it!

Generic Eric

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4520
  • Last login:July 15, 2024, 09:18:25 pm
  • Restore! Don't maim for MAME, build from scratch!
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,143226.0.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #82 on: February 05, 2015, 04:11:55 pm »


I wonder if Im a deal breaker for anyone.  If so, speak up

I'm waiting for you to ---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- or get off the pot before I decide to ---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- or get off the pot...

All jokes aside, I've got to ask the same.

Anyone waiting to commit based on whether I deuce or bail?

LT if YOU are someone's deal-breaker I'd rather not see them on the board. Just do it!
That like button would be handy now. 

I don't think there is much opportunity to offend anyone over any of this.  I mean, who got offended over the lack of pinball builds?  If so, PayPal me, I'll make sure you aren't offended. Same goes for driving cabs.

pbj

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11056
  • Last login:Today at 09:37:45 am
  • Obey.
    • The Chris Burke Band
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #83 on: February 05, 2015, 04:25:57 pm »
The virtual pinball thing curled up and died so damn quickly it wasn't even funny.  I always suspected part of the appeal was rubbing your disposable income into everyone's face, and now that you can slap one together a lot cheaper nobody seems interested.  So theory confirmed.  Plus they all suck anyway.





ChanceKJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3229
  • Last login:August 07, 2021, 02:52:06 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #84 on: February 05, 2015, 04:33:38 pm »
Um... Yeah, Also Canadian. Opt is right, the further west you go the cooler we get. ;)

I also accept the nomination, with one stipulation: I don't care for drama or childish Internet political crap. I'll promise to be fair and compromise with everyone where possible. But I'm gonna be firm if anyone else wants to play games.

If this changes anyone's decision then I'm sorry. But I'm willing to work with everyone else if they are willing to with me.

pbj

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11056
  • Last login:Today at 09:37:45 am
  • Obey.
    • The Chris Burke Band
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #85 on: February 05, 2015, 05:06:04 pm »

Ond

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2353
  • Last login:July 10, 2025, 08:06:51 am
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #86 on: February 05, 2015, 05:28:15 pm »
The virtual pinball thing curled up and died so damn quickly it wasn't even funny.  I always suspected part of the appeal was rubbing your disposable income into everyone's face, and now that you can slap one together a lot cheaper nobody seems interested.  So theory confirmed.  Plus they all suck anyway.

They should make you a board member PBJ, anyway have to agree with this.   I used to think I wanted to build a VP, not anymore.

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #87 on: February 05, 2015, 05:29:48 pm »
The virtual pinball thing curled up and died so damn quickly it wasn't even funny.  I always suspected part of the appeal was rubbing your disposable income into everyone's face, and now that you can slap one together a lot cheaper nobody seems interested.  So theory confirmed.  Plus they all suck anyway.

They should make you a board member PBJ, anyway have to agree with this.   I used to think I wanted to build a VP, not anymore.

He was nominated and accepted.  :cheers:
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

ChanceKJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3229
  • Last login:August 07, 2021, 02:52:06 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #88 on: February 05, 2015, 05:37:25 pm »
Hahaha,

I really have zero beef with anyone here. Seriously.

Now, some of those guys on KLOV are a different story.  ::)

pbj

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11056
  • Last login:Today at 09:37:45 am
  • Obey.
    • The Chris Burke Band
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #89 on: February 05, 2015, 05:37:54 pm »

Ond

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2353
  • Last login:July 10, 2025, 08:06:51 am
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #90 on: February 05, 2015, 05:38:31 pm »
The virtual pinball thing curled up and died so damn quickly it wasn't even funny.  I always suspected part of the appeal was rubbing your disposable income into everyone's face, and now that you can slap one together a lot cheaper nobody seems interested.  So theory confirmed.  Plus they all suck anyway.

They should make you a board member PBJ, anyway have to agree with this.   I used to think I wanted to build a VP, not anymore.

He was nominator and accepted.  :cheers:

Good.

opt2not

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6173
  • Last login:April 02, 2024, 07:42:30 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #91 on: February 05, 2015, 05:40:41 pm »
I don't know why Malenko and Nephasth are conditional. These two knuckleheads should be on the board, seriously.  :laugh:

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #92 on: February 05, 2015, 05:48:36 pm »
I really have zero beef with anyone here.


Nephasth

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #93 on: February 05, 2015, 05:50:00 pm »
I don't know why Malenko and Nephasth are conditional. These two knuckleheads should be on the board, seriously.  :laugh:

Just waiting to see what happens. Here's why:

So how are we picking a new board?  Post your recommendations as to who should be on the UCA board. You can't nominate yourself and if nominated you have to publicly accept - silence is not consent.  If you're nominated and you accept then presto-finito you're on the board.  No voting thread, no rigaramole.  Donkeskis.  The fate of future UCAs is in your hands.  This thread is yours, rules free.  Speak your mind.  Prior board members can continue to serve if someone recommends them and they accept.  No limit on board members.     

I don't want to back out if I accept. The thing with the no limit on board members is, if there's 10 guys handling it already, there's no need for an eleventh.

Louis Tully

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1800
  • Last login:February 13, 2015, 09:41:03 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #94 on: February 05, 2015, 05:52:56 pm »
.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2015, 07:30:03 pm by Louis Tully »

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #95 on: February 05, 2015, 06:00:22 pm »
I think we kind of reached who's going to get nominated already. I think we're good.
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #96 on: February 05, 2015, 06:05:30 pm »
I don't know why Malenko and Nephasth are conditional. These two knuckleheads should be on the board, seriously.  :laugh:

Just waiting to see what happens. Here's why:

So how are we picking a new board?  Post your recommendations as to who should be on the UCA board. You can't nominate yourself and if nominated you have to publicly accept - silence is not consent.  If you're nominated and you accept then presto-finito you're on the board.  No voting thread, no rigaramole.  Donkeskis.  The fate of future UCAs is in your hands.  This thread is yours, rules free.  Speak your mind.  Prior board members can continue to serve if someone recommends them and they accept.  No limit on board members.     

I don't want to back out if I accept. The thing with the no limit on board members is, if there's 10 guys handling it already, there's no need for an eleventh.

That's a facile argument.  What you're saying is, "if there is work to be done, and someone else can do it, I won't."

If you're volunteering to be the board member that does nothing why even bother?

Louis Tully

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1800
  • Last login:February 13, 2015, 09:41:03 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #97 on: February 05, 2015, 06:05:51 pm »
.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2015, 07:30:08 pm by Louis Tully »

Nephasth

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #98 on: February 05, 2015, 06:11:25 pm »
That's a facile argument.  What you're saying is, "if there is work to be done, and someone else can do it, I won't."

If you're volunteering to be the board member that does nothing why even bother?

I guess you can read into it however you want. I run a dart league in my town. There's a lot of ins and outs and whathaveyous, but in short, it's a lot of work to run that league. And I do it alone. I don't see the UCAs needing dozens of people on the board when it can be handled by a few. Otherwise, you end up with people who don't actively participate, and then what the hell is the point of even being on the board?

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #99 on: February 05, 2015, 06:30:06 pm »
That's a facile argument.  What you're saying is, "if there is work to be done, and someone else can do it, I won't."

If you're volunteering to be the board member that does nothing why even bother?

I guess you can read into it however you want. I run a dart league in my town. There's a lot of ins and outs and whathaveyous, but in short, it's a lot of work to run that league. And I do it alone. I don't see the UCAs needing dozens of people on the board when it can be handled by a few. Otherwise, you end up with people who don't actively participate, and then what the hell is the point of even being on the board?

The board is currently at five.  Seven if you and Malenko decide to join.  You're right, one person can do it.  I have.  The board isn't there to split up the work tho, the board is there to validate certain recommendations and discard others - so it's not just one or two people deciding how the UCAs will be run.  It's there to ensure the longevity of the process.  Your dart league probably has a set of rules, you - as League Pres or whatever may be the guy that has to say, "we're not doing that, the rules say this" and there is probably a book or something you can reference, but for the UCAs the rules are written in the sand.  That's why I think a board is a good thing, not just about splitting up who has to do some posting here and there.   

Nephasth

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #100 on: February 05, 2015, 06:52:48 pm »
I'm out. Thanks. :dunno

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #101 on: February 05, 2015, 06:59:25 pm »
Anyhoo, I move that we finalize the board? Can we set a final cutoff?
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

opt2not

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6173
  • Last login:April 02, 2024, 07:42:30 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #102 on: February 05, 2015, 07:00:07 pm »
I'm out. Thanks. :dunno

:(  Well, at least that's definitive.  >:D

Generic Eric

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4520
  • Last login:July 15, 2024, 09:18:25 pm
  • Restore! Don't maim for MAME, build from scratch!
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,143226.0.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #103 on: February 05, 2015, 07:21:35 pm »
Anyhoo, I move that we finalize the board? Can we set a final cutoff?
secondthirded. This was all too soon, too public, and for a group that wanted to pass on UCA, several don't seem ready to.

Maybe there are some plug-ins that help voting?  This can't be there first group to do this sort of thing.

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #104 on: February 05, 2015, 07:39:08 pm »
Anyhoo, I move that we finalize the board? Can we set a final cutoff?
This was all too soon, too public, and for a group that wanted to pass on UCA, several don't seem ready to.

Considering the only two board members with more than a post in this thread are Yots and I, one would assume you mean us.  I didn't get the impression we were clinging to anything and not sure what's too soon or too public.  I'm with Neph

:dunno


Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #105 on: February 05, 2015, 07:42:35 pm »
Anyhoo, I move that we finalize the board? Can we set a final cutoff?

It can cut off whenever.  I recommend we wait for a final word from Malenko since he's still listed as on the fence.  Once he's in or out that can be it.  Tying it to the UCA voting close date was arbitrary.  I didn't think this thread would get legs for a while.  I also think there is a fine batch of new board members and I can't wait to see how they run the ball. 

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #106 on: February 05, 2015, 07:44:22 pm »
Shi t, I know you're not talking about me. I'm ready to have this ---maternal-smurf--- off. I just don't see a point in dragging out the nomination process for so long. I also don't see an issue with it being public. The board should be all about transparency. that's why this is being done in a manner. No one's doing any backdoor deals to get onto the board or anything like that.
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #107 on: February 05, 2015, 07:45:26 pm »
Shi t, I know you're not talking about me. I'm ready to have this ---maternal-smurf--- off. I just don't see a point in dragging out the nomination process for so long. I also don't see an issue with it being public. The board should be all about transparency. that's why this is being done in a manner. No one's doing any backdoor deals to get onto the board or anything like that.

It's probably all aimed at BobA.  BobA is a shifty sunofagun. 

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #108 on: February 05, 2015, 07:57:34 pm »
Quote from: Le Chuck link=topic=143689.msg
It's probably all aimed at BobA.  BobA is a shifty sunofagun.

That's what happens when you have Canadians on your board. And now we're going to have two? Shazzle!
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

Malenko

  • KNEEL BEFORE ZODlenko!
  • Trade Count: (+58)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 14019
  • Last login:Today at 06:33:34 pm
  • Have you played with my GingerBalls?
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,142404.msg1475162.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #109 on: February 05, 2015, 08:02:55 pm »
come on neph, lets rock this ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---
If you're replying to a troll you are part of the problem.
I also need to follow this advice. Ignore or report, don't reply.

Le Chuck

  • Saint, make a poll!
  • Wiki Contributor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5509
  • Last login:June 14, 2025, 06:26:06 pm
  • <insert personal text here>
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #110 on: February 05, 2015, 08:05:11 pm »
come on neph, lets rock this ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---

That's what I'm talking about right there!

Nephasth

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #111 on: February 05, 2015, 08:12:38 pm »
come on neph, lets rock this ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---

You've convinced me. Let's do it. I shouldn't be listening to the detractors. :cheers:

Malenko

  • KNEEL BEFORE ZODlenko!
  • Trade Count: (+58)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 14019
  • Last login:Today at 06:33:34 pm
  • Have you played with my GingerBalls?
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,142404.msg1475162.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #112 on: February 05, 2015, 08:13:20 pm »
come on neph, lets rock this ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---

You've convinced me. Let's do it. I shouldn't be listening to the detractors. :cheers:

That's what Im screamin!
If you're replying to a troll you are part of the problem.
I also need to follow this advice. Ignore or report, don't reply.

opt2not

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6173
  • Last login:April 02, 2024, 07:42:30 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #113 on: February 05, 2015, 08:16:48 pm »
come on neph, lets rock this ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---

You've convinced me. Let's do it. I shouldn't be listening to the detractors. :cheers:

YEAH!! Let's beast this UCA!  :applaud:

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #114 on: February 05, 2015, 08:18:29 pm »
Congrats,  suckers.

Ladies and Gentlemen,  your 2016 UCA Board.
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

Nephasth

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #115 on: February 05, 2015, 08:19:30 pm »
Congrats,  suckers.

Ladies and Gentlemen,  your 2016 UCA Board.

2015*

ChanceKJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3229
  • Last login:August 07, 2021, 02:52:06 pm
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #116 on: February 05, 2015, 08:23:44 pm »

UCA

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 146
  • Last login:January 12, 2017, 03:47:16 pm
  • Nominate your favorite projects for a UCA!
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #117 on: February 05, 2015, 08:26:23 pm »
On 01 March 2015 the reins of the UCAs (to include the totally baller UCA avatard) will pass to the new UCA board.  They are:

Vigo
PBJ
ChanceKJ
Opt2Not
Louis Tully
Malenko
Nephasth

They're it until they're dead, or quit, or whatever. 

And to close my tenure as UCA I'd just like to say that this has been your friendly neighborhood DriverMan and I invented MAME.  Peace out bishes!
Previous UCA Award Winners
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015

yotsuya

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19960
  • Last login:July 17, 2025, 10:00:30 pm
  • 2014 UCA Winner, 2014, 2015, 2016 ZapCon Winner
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,137636.msg1420628.html
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #118 on: February 05, 2015, 08:38:53 pm »
Oh ---steaming pile of meadow muffin---, I forgot about Driverman. Is it too late to nominate somebody?
***Build what you dig, bro. Build what you dig.***

DaOld Man

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5158
  • Last login:May 24, 2025, 09:57:44 pm
  • Wheres my coffee?
    • Skenny's Outpost
Re: After Action Review, the 2014 UCA thread
« Reply #119 on: February 05, 2015, 08:39:49 pm »
Well we know who start sucking up too now.
LOL.
Seriously, congrats new guys!