<i>NOW who is to blame?</i>
Well....we know it wasn't the gun, as only people kill people. 
Although this story is tragic, I have to say that with a name like Dimebag, my guess is that drugs are somehow involved.
Try using these to surround your "i's", MrC
[ ]
Well, THAT'S the first logical thing I've ever seen you say, even though you mean it sarcastically.
I've YET to see in the story where the guy threw his gun on stage and it went off, killing several people. Again, what you seem to miss, is the large 150+ lb wart of a human being who was hell-bent on extracting some sort of "justice".
From all reports thus far, the guy felt he needed to make someone pay - specifically that dimebag dude - and WAS able to get close enough where even without a gun, he'd have been able to kill at least ONE person - for some reason you can't seem to get it into your head that the gun was just what he chose to use - and the PERSON killed PEOPLE.
Hey, one thing I DON'T find your loony point addressing is how he would have been subdued - after all, he was subdued with - A GUN! What should the cops have done? Adopted a resolution that he drop the gun?

Drugs were involved

Do ya THINK? So I guess, like as in your silly jab at guns - we should now work to legalize more of them

Hey, how's it going with your "get out the Kerry vote" campaign?