Thanks very much for your help.. Yes, I was unsure about the overclocking of the RAM as this Asus MB that I have as my main PC ( Asus P5N32-e SLI) allows me to run the RAM and the CPU at independent speeds. I've got my Q6600 Quad running at 4Ghz and I can run the Gskill 800 at 800Mhz... So this Gigabyte board is different in that respect? I have tried this Gskill ram right up to 910 but it does have the occasional lockup with it that high.. 890 is still a little high so I just leave it at 800 and have the timings at 4,4,3,5... Anywho....I'll look at some 1066Mhz stuff then.. Any brand will do seeing as I wont be overclocking it yeah? I was thinking of running a Cooler Master Geminii S Universal CPU Cooler. What do you think? At the moment I have the stock intel cooler from my Quad core bolted on.. Its a little bigger than a stock intel Dual Core cooler and has a bigger copper footprint, but as yet I havn't fired anything up cuz I'm waiting on the 8500GT...
Again, cheers for the help. I've been pointing many newbies to this thread... I think it should be put up on a pedestal.
The Intel 3 & 4 series chipsets have a minium FSB to RAM frequency RATIO of 1:1, so you can't run your RAM at a slower rate than you FSB. You may well find you can get more out of your memory on the Intel chipset, the Nvidia 680i SLI chipset has the single worst memory controller in the history of computing in my books, any motherboard with that chipset should have come bundled with memory that had been individually tested for compatibly with that board.
Any brand of DDR2-1066 will do, but I suggest sticking to a good brand name or memory modules on compatible list for the motherboard.
The Cooler Master Geminii series coolers are great for making quiet systems, but aren't that great for overclocking, a CPU will run about 5+ Deg C hotter with a Geminii S cooling it, than the same CPU cooled with a Sunbeam Core Contact Freezer for example.
Yeah, the old Pentium-D style copper cored coolers that came with the early Core 2 Duo's are much better, than the shortened all aluminum heasinks you get with the later Core 2 Duos, but I wouldn't recommend using one to cool a heavily overclocked CPU.
No Problem. Yeah this thread has taken on a like of it own, I remember posting it and thinking I'd be lucky if it got a couple of hundred views and a dozen replies at best before it dropped off the first page and was forgotten, but now some 36000+ views and 380 odd posts later it still going strong.
Mate, I have to say..Thank you for all your help with my questions and with this whole entire thread. As I've said before I don't think there is a place on the net with this much information dealing with the system specs required for a good MAME rig. You showed me the ingredients that I needed to make my MAME machine a winner and to put a huge smile on mine and my 7 year old sons face.
My 8500GT came in the mail yesterday.. It was the last peice of the puzzle that I needed before I could fire this thing up.. I ripped the box open and shoved the card into the PCIe slot, as it was all ready and waiting for the card to come.
I fired it up and bang, it came to life... I went straight to the Bios to check on everything and found that the board had been running at 2.8Ghz before me...So I know its had a nice easy life. Everything had been found, and was running as spec.. After setting it to 3Ghz I rebooted..
I then installed Windows Vista 64.. The OS of choice ( until windows 7 is good to go. The benchmarks I've seen from windows 7 shows a 50 to 70% increase in speed over Vista and a 150% over XP with rock solid stability.. And thats just a beta..Anyway).. after the install was complete, I did a basic setup of windows to set it up the way I like it, then installed the video, chipset and audio drivers. Then opened up Everest to see what I had under the bonnet....VERY NICE, VERY NICE INDEED...
Then, onto MAME... I run MAMEUIFX64 as my MAME of choice. Now at this point I have to say that my e8400 is not overclocked.. it's still running at the stock 3Ghz..The next fastest machine that I've played MAME games up until now is on may main PC which is a q6600 quad running at 2.4Ghz (but sometimes overclocked to 4Ghz with watercooling)..I can say right away that this dual core running at 3Ghz with its 6meg of L2 cache is faster than my q6600 running at 3Ghz.. I put this down to the lack of L2 cache.. 2meg..
I started out playing MAME games over 10 years ago with a celeron 300Mhz overcloed to 450MHZ (arr the good ol days). a Riva TNT2 Ultra card, and 512meg of sdram. Games were choppy, and chads didn't exist...For the fact that the consumer didn't have access to technology to run chds yet...
Iv'e spent alot of money over the years, upgrading and upgrading.. Hoping that "that next upgrade" will see me playing all the games available to us. 1.3Ghz Durons, 1.8Ghz Seprons, 3 Ghz P4s etc etc etc... UNTIL NOW
On this day, I can say that I can play the larrgest amount of MAME games than I ever been able to play before.. and I know with overclocking I have even more overhead to play with.
Mate, you are a legend.. If I see you in the street.. I'll buy you a beer. These are good times indeed.
My Machine:
CPU: Intel E8400 Core 2 Duo
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3R Motherboard rev2.1 LGA 775
RAM: 2G Gskill DDR2 800Mhz (but may upgrade to some 1066Mhz peices as these may not suit an overclock)
Video card: nVidia 8500GT PCIe
Power Supply: Codegen 550w
CPU heatsink: Stock Intel Quad core. (they are larger than the stock intel dual core items..)But this will change with overclocking as this heatsink my not be good enough.