As for Randy chosing your FE, I have read every LEDWiz related thread on this board and he does mention that he will be using Atomic. I could be wrong about that, but again, it's not the point why is he supporting Atomic and not the rest of us?
I like AtomicFE and I like the way Youki supports his users. I have seen him appear to drop what he was doing and write special programs for them
at no charge because of something special they wanted to do with their system. I have seen no other developer (other than MikeQ) who exhibits this level of selfless personal dedication to their users. I have developed relationships with these two folks and personally like them. And because of that, I do what I can for them (and if you saw my to do list, you might appreciate the effort that requires on my part.)
I'm trying to keep this post positive, so I will not get into all of the negatives that have affected my decisions about how to spend my already too limited time, and whom I choose to spend it on.
On a related note, the OCX does not "suck big balls" and I spent considerable time making and documenting it. The software in the video of the lights reacting to the music is, in fact, using it to communicate with the hardware. The reason that no other DLL is necessary is, as you already know, because MikeQ has already provided one for all to use, free of charge.
As for my FE "selection", I don't even have a dedicated "play" machine (it's a test rig.) So when I am testing something, I need to get to it fast, and that means a mouse driven Windows interface works the best. But if and when I do set up a small unit dedicated to "fun", it will most likely run AtomicFE, so it would be nice if it worked with my hardware

This is the mystery. Perhaps he likes people who think competition is healthy for the community? Personally I think you ideals are detremental to the scene. I think your more interested in your own ego and getting more users using Atomic than the scene as a whole. Not everyone here thinks like that. And I don't accociate myself with howard, but feel free to read the numerous posts where Randy and Howard go neck to neck. It's quite a amusing! And half the time Howard is ---smurfing--- right, and that is saying something!
I won't address the comment about Howard and I, other than to say that we are in disagreement. Again, trying to stay positive.
There is healthy competition where everyone has the potential to gain and there is competition that is overtly detrimental. Writing any piece of software is long and arduous work, and when you receive no compensation, the only reward is the gratitude of your user base. How is it wrong to want to expand the user base for a piece of software you work so very hard on and receive no compensation for? Why is is wrong or "detrimental to the scene" to feel that software which withholds desirable features or support priority from users unless they pay for it is a commercial endeavor? Why is it wrong to have the prerogative not to directly support a competing venture one views as a commercial endeavor? And please understand, I have nothing at all against commercial endeavors.

That is all I take with me from the comments I have seen Youki make that could be considered even remotely "competitive".
Let me just say one more time that the efforts of all those involved in adding support for GGG hardware are very much appreciated. But I'd also like to state that I am not so naive as to believe that it is being done to benefit
me. I provide as much assistance as I can, given my time constraints, and as much as I am allowed given business constraints. The availability of free programming tools and documentation is support of that fact. When I am pushed for more than I am freely willing or able to give, individuals just have to realize that many things are rightfully taken into consideration when deciding whether I have the time or desire to facilitate them.
RandyT