Well thanks for all the responses fellas

I am trying to learn architecture crash-course style and it's tricky. I think in about a year I'll have a sum of bucks to buy some land in the country and build a little country home. I'd like it to be passive solar.
Here in Maine it gets very cold. Homeowners spend like $1000 to $2500 and more every winter just to keep their houses warm, then many spend a lot on air conditioning every summer to keep it cool. All the while we are burning oil and coal and money. With a passive solar house it is much more efficient.
At the time of our last energy crisis a lot of people tried to design smarter houses and smarter cars - yet here we are in the exact same situation, another energy crisis! WTF !!! In Canada in 1977 engineers built a house that used 80% less energy, and Canada is cold too! Check it out :
http://esask.uregina.ca/entry/energy-efficient_houses.htmlhttp://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/forgotten-pioneers-energy-efficiencyThat house was the basis for the German PassivHaus :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_houseI was just talking with a mother-of-four last year, living here in Maine, who said she and many of her friends were having trouble paying their oil bills to keep their houses warm. It's a real problem that hits homeowners hard. But if their houses were designed with energy in mind they might not be in such a predicament.
Those people would benefit from a retrofit :
http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/green-basics/remodel-project-deep-energy-retrofitIt's unfortunate our government doesn't subsidize that.
We import oil from the unstable middle east. It's a dirty and finite resource. I don't want to build a house that needs 20 barrels of oil per year to stay comfortable. I'd like to build a house that works with nature rather than against it.
So I liked the idea of an EarthShip at first :
http://www.earthship.net/buildings/global-model.htmlBut many, including David Wright AIA, feel they are toxic on account of tires in the walls.
... I visited the headquarters in New Mexico last
year. The whole concept sucks as developed by Reynolds. The idea is ok but
needs to be updated and cleaned up, especially the use of toxic tires.
Cheers,
David Wright, AIA
His homepage :
http://www.davidwrightaia.com/His book :
http://www.amazon.com/Passive-Solar-Primer-Sustainable-Architecture/dp/0764330705So I don't anticipate having lots of bucks, I'd like to build a house that is about $25,000 - It doesn't have to be so big, like a 2 bedroom apartment, small but comfortable. But I don't know if that number is realistic. To make up for it's small size I could build a big barn next to it, or some other unheated structure if we wanted room to stretch out and have a workshop and such.
Because I anticipate having low bucks I was Googling for cheap house designs and came upon the A-frame :
An unmodified A-frame is without doubt the most cost-effective structure imaginable. Wood-frame with metal roofing, fiberglass insulation and wallboard inside - it just doesn't get much cheaper for finished space.
Of course, you'll only have windows on the ends unless you use skylights, which aren't cheap - at least for good quality ones that last. Even so, it is the cheapest structure for labor and materials.
That text is from here :
http://forums.gardenweb.com/forums/load/homest/msg0918514831754.htmlAt first I thought A-frame's were completely wacky, but as I looked them up more they really started to grow on me. My daughter immediately liked them.
Then I asked at "Green Building talk" forum and a smart guy over there found the shape agreeable for passive solar :
http://tinyurl.com/yhjuqjeSo it was settled then : a funky A-frame that is passive solar

The A-Frame was designed in the 1957 by Andrew Geller. In 1978 the US department of agriculture released plans for cabins and vacation homes and one was an A-frame cabin :
http://www.amazon.com/Vacation-Homes-Cabins-Dept-Agriculture/dp/0486236315My fuzzy plan so far is to use that 1978 plan but modify it to be super passive solar
