Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?  (Read 7826 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm

Sorry tommy, not those Giants.

The SF Giants.  Bonds has 753 homeruns.  Anyone else going to try and make sure they see 755 and 756?

tommy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2007, 03:30:39 pm »
Bloody cheaters, he should retire now.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2007, 03:32:19 pm »

What rules has he broken?  Has he failed any drug test?

Sure, the guy very likely took them, but so did so many other players that it shouldn't be held against only some.

What I don't get is why people only point fingers at homerun hitters.  Are pitchers and smaller guys not potential steroid users?

tommy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2007, 03:35:36 pm »
Actually i'm all for him breaking the record. He was good for many many years without using anything and using drugs will not make you a superstar overnight, you either have it or you do not.

 It's just too bad people will never hold this record as high as it should be.

Kaytrim

  • I'm too nice a guy
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2095
  • Last login:September 22, 2015, 04:11:30 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2007, 03:38:13 pm »
 :angry: After he almost single handily beat my Cubbies yesterday I will not be watching Him beat THE Record.  I was never really interested in Bonds and what he did or how he did it.  If (when) he does beat the record there will always be people that will think he cheated by using performance enhancing drugs.  Your shoe size doesn't get bigger nor does your hat size, his have.

Kaytrim

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2007, 03:40:15 pm »
I'm mostly of the opinion that any of the excessive records of the past 20 or so years are pretty much tainted.  Not just the homerun records.  There were a lot of "holy crap never thought we'd see that" records in baseball in the steroid era.  Most of them are pitching records, too.

Are drugs that are within the rules cheating?  Steroids were not against the rules for most of his career.  You also have to figure steroids don't win you gold gloves.  Bonds has like 9 gold gloves.

Chris G

  • Well then throw me in a dress and call me Sally
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1039
  • Last login:April 16, 2023, 04:39:59 pm
  • Robotron in progress? I'm on my way.
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2007, 03:50:16 pm »
I hate baseball, but it might be worth watching in case there are some good brawls in the stands over the homerun balls again.

CCM

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1274
  • Last login:August 08, 2020, 10:08:27 am
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2007, 03:52:18 pm »
I hate baseball too, so I won't be watching.  I can honestly say that I haven't watched as much as a single inning of baseball this year.

mccoy178

  • It's hard to work with a straight jacket on
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3127
  • Last login:September 03, 2021, 10:23:42 am
  • Go Bucks!
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2007, 05:03:11 pm »
I'll watch just to see how many homeruns Arod is gonna need to pass him someday.

billf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
  • Last login:September 14, 2022, 05:53:05 pm
  • Why ya dog-gone crazy idgit!
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2007, 05:30:16 pm »
Looks like Barry Bonds has 8 gold gloves:
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/awards/aw_ggnl.shtml

Not surprisingly the last one was in 1998 about the time he started bulking up.  I believe he's a huge liability in the field now.

Of course Bonds will break the record eventually.  I certainly won't go out of my way to see him hit 755 or 756.

If I was a head coach of the opposing team this season, I'd intentionally walk him or drill'em every time he was up to bat.  Put him on base where he can't run and is really a liability.  Hank Aaron will always be the home run king.



tommy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2007, 06:04:46 pm »
How about i bean you every time you come on the forum.  :applaud:

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2007, 06:07:26 pm »
I'll watch just to see how many homeruns Arod is gonna need to pass him someday.

Will still take him quite a few years at his current pace... while Arod is sure as hell great, there is no way to be sure he'll be great long enough.

Steroids don't make you a .375 hitter, either.  Like tommy said, either you have it or you don't, and steroids will only put it over the top.  If steroids could make people hit .375, Bonds would have hit .500.

billf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
  • Last login:September 14, 2022, 05:53:05 pm
  • Why ya dog-gone crazy idgit!
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2007, 06:44:22 pm »
How about i bean you every time you come on the forum.  :applaud:

If you throw like Eli Manning, I should be safe.   ;D

tommy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2007, 06:50:35 pm »
Oh a giant joke, very clever. Bean>>>>>>>>>Billf  :angel:

Donkey_Kong

  • heh. I dont know what it stands for but I'm immature and thats hilarious.
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1693
  • Last login:October 20, 2019, 12:39:54 am
    • CNC Machines
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2007, 07:08:23 pm »
The Homerun record has nothing on Cal Ripken Jr's "Iron man" record.  ;D
Carved Signs, Custom Gameroom Signs, and Arcade Game Decor and now CNC MACHINES by Melissa Jones

Zero_Hour

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 760
  • Last login:August 07, 2024, 11:40:33 am
  • Enjoying the irony of taking games seriously
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2007, 07:22:54 pm »
The only sacred achievement in Baseball is The Dock Ellis LSD No-Hitter.
"Paradise, is exactly like where you are right now - only much, MUCH better." -Laurie Anderson

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2007, 07:28:46 pm »

I hadn't heard about that... that's awesome.

billf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
  • Last login:September 14, 2022, 05:53:05 pm
  • Why ya dog-gone crazy idgit!
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2007, 07:45:54 pm »

I hadn't heard about that... that's awesome.

I hadn't heard about that either, but I just read about it at snopes (http://www.snopes.com/sports/baseball/ellis.asp).  If you take him at his word, I would call it impressive, certainly not awesome - nothing really "awesome" about a pro athlete taking hallucinogenic drug.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2007, 07:47:26 pm by billf »

Guaranos

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2007, 08:50:42 am »
I'm a big baseball fan, but I won't be watching any Giants games until Bonds retires.  There's some other guys in the league that I try to avoid watching too (Giambi, Sosa, Matthews, etc).

While steroids weren't technically against the rules when a lot of these guys started using, they were against the law.  And beyond that, it's a matter of respect for the game - something that Bonds lacks.  Bonds admitted in court to "unknowingly" using steroids.  Bonds has consequently been called out as a cheater by the fans, like McGwire was called out by the baseball writers who didn't vote him into the hall of fame this year.  If Bonds was not so self-centered, and had a shred of honor and dignity, he'd be able to see the difference between what he is doing and what Aaron did, and the damage he's causing to the game, and act accordingly.

If some good comes out of all this, I hope that it at least leads to some greater scrutiny of traditional HoF thresholds like 500 HR, 3000 hits, etc, and causes people to re-evaluate the careers of people like Dale Murphy, Jim Rice, etc.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2007, 05:23:47 pm »

The HR threshhold was always 400HR, not 500.   It used to be either 400HR or 3000 hits were automatic entry, which is why guys like Yastrzemski were such a big deal, having done both.  IIRC it's only like 7-8 guys with both 400 and 3000.  500/3000 is only 4 guys, IIRC, and sadly one of them is Palmeiro.

billf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 528
  • Last login:September 14, 2022, 05:53:05 pm
  • Why ya dog-gone crazy idgit!
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2007, 07:50:03 pm »
I totally agree with what Guaranos posted.

Chad, I believe what Guaranos was implying is is that 500 home runs is currently a lock for the HoF (unless your Mark McGuire) and 3000 hits is a lock.  Not that both needed to be achieved.

Like you said though only a few select are part of the 3000 hit/500 hr club.  Here is a wiki entry for the 3000-500 Club (and you're right Palmeiro is in this select group):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3000-500_Club

Here's a cool stat: Hank Aaron had 755 home runs and 3771 career hits.  If you take away all of his home runs, he still has over 3000 hits.  That is amazing.

Bonds has a long way to go to get 3000 hits.  He's currently just over 2900 hits.

JackTucky

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1613
  • Last login:January 04, 2021, 12:00:58 pm
  • Soon I will post that I am a triathalete
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2007, 10:26:40 pm »

What rules has he broken?  Has he failed any drug test?

 :laugh2:  OJ Simpson is innocent too, right?

What I don't get is why people only point fingers at homerun hitters.  Are pitchers and smaller guys not potential steroid users?

He stinks because he's an ass.  When asked what memorabilia he might send to Cooperstown to document his record, he said, "I look out for me"

It's his asshatness in my eyes that makes most people hate him.  Hank Aaron was a great player who put up with too much during his run.  He's still a great man.  Bonds is a --cream-filled twinkie--.

Hank Aaron sent everything he could to cooperstown. He said it was because "the record belongs to the people"   :notworthy:

Oh, and I think Bonds should send his hats to cooperstown. His hats throughout the years.   One size 7, one 7 1/2, one 8, etc.  Rick Reilly made that joke. 

=J
Well, that's where we go a-ridin' into town, a whampin' and whompin' every livin' thing that moves within an inch of its life. Except the women folks, of course.

Guaranos

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #22 on: July 22, 2007, 11:44:46 pm »

The HR threshhold was always 400HR, not 500.   It used to be either 400HR or 3000 hits were automatic entry, which is why guys like Yastrzemski were such a big deal, having done both.  IIRC it's only like 7-8 guys with both 400 and 3000.  500/3000 is only 4 guys, IIRC, and sadly one of them is Palmeiro.

For players from the 70's on up, 400 isn't a lock.  See Dave Kingman, Darrell Evans, etc.  Most of their careers were played in the 70's, they have 400+ HR, and are not in.  That list is growing, with Andre Dawson (still a chance), Jose Canseco, Juan Gonzalez, probably Bagwell, probably McGriff, etc. 

500 is getting nearly as meaningless when people like Frank Thomas and Jim Thome can devolve into one-dimensional players fairly early in their career and still reach (or in Thome's case, soon reach) the threshold.  Guys like Thome and Thomas are not in the same class as Mantle, Banks, etc no matter what their HR totals end up at.  The guys who are currently reaching/nearing 600, known cheaters excluded, are the types of players that belong in the hall.

btp2k2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 515
  • Last login:March 16, 2011, 01:02:36 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2007, 01:28:07 am »
Boo to juicers!


ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2007, 08:18:57 am »

And yet the only difference between Bonds and Clemens is that no one dares say "steroids" and "Clemens" in the same sentence for some reason.  Can't figure that one out.

jbox

  • BYOAC Poet Laureate
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1032
  • Last login:November 30, 2007, 08:00:54 am
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #25 on: July 23, 2007, 07:57:51 pm »
Boo to juicers!
Really? I thought everyone was a fan of "Will It Blend"?  ;D
Done. SLATFATF.

Zero_Hour

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 760
  • Last login:August 07, 2024, 11:40:33 am
  • Enjoying the irony of taking games seriously
"Paradise, is exactly like where you are right now - only much, MUCH better." -Laurie Anderson

Guaranos

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #27 on: July 23, 2007, 08:43:58 pm »

And yet the only difference between Bonds and Clemens is that no one dares say "steroids" and "Clemens" in the same sentence for some reason.  Can't figure that one out.
I'm with you there.  I think Clemens is at least as much of a cheater as Bonds.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #28 on: July 23, 2007, 09:20:03 pm »

I look at it this way.  When Clemens was in his final two years with Boston, I lived within walking distance of Fenway (at Northeastern).  I caught a couple games a week (scalpers will dump them for pennies in the second inning) and nearly all of Clemens' starts that last season.  He was done.  Shoulder dead, hell I saw him hit three guys in one inning because he had no control at all.  Duquette recognizes this and cuts him loose rather than give him a huge new contract.  He goes to Toronto with his minced ham right shoulder and somehow wins two Cy Youngs and is back to his 24 year old 1986 self for the next several years.

Do the math.  That guy has at least as many needle marks between his toes as Bonds.  Probably more.

Guaranos

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #29 on: July 23, 2007, 11:13:22 pm »

I look at it this way.  When Clemens was in his final two years with Boston, I lived within walking distance of Fenway (at Northeastern).  I caught a couple games a week (scalpers will dump them for pennies in the second inning) and nearly all of Clemens' starts that last season.  He was done.  Shoulder dead, hell I saw him hit three guys in one inning because he had no control at all.  Duquette recognizes this and cuts him loose rather than give him a huge new contract.  He goes to Toronto with his minced ham right shoulder and somehow wins two Cy Youngs and is back to his 24 year old 1986 self for the next several years.

Do the math.  That guy has at least as many needle marks between his toes as Bonds.  Probably more.
And who was on his team the year before his magical revival?  Jose Canseco.  The same Jose Canseco who played with McGwire, Giambi, Palmeiro, Juan Gonzalez, Tejada, etc, etc.

If you look at the teams Canseco joined, you'll see some interesting trends.  He seems to bring out the best in a lot of players, and not just the obvious ones like those mentioned above.  Look at guys like Shawn Green, Mo Vaughn, Reggie Jefferson, etc.  Either Jose was a heck of a mentor and could be the greatest hitting coach ever, or he had some great connections.

shardian

  • Saint is the evil mastermind
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9218
  • Last login:August 21, 2015, 03:11:31 pm
  • Friends don't let friends build frankenpanels...
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #30 on: July 24, 2007, 08:14:02 am »
Did Jose accuse Clemens in his book?

Oh and BTW, a pitcher can regain form. Rest, a change in training, etc. can work wonders for a pitcher. FYI, Nolan Ryan could still hurl the heat into his 40's and of course he wasn't a juicer.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #31 on: July 24, 2007, 08:26:43 am »

Clemens' problem wasn't form, it was a dead shoulder.  He spent the most of is last two seasons in Boston on the DL.  Pitchers don't regain their fastball in their mid 30s, just like running backs (with mileage) don't get better at 30.

Ryan was a freak and threw until his arm literally snapped on the mound.  That was ugly.

shardian

  • Saint is the evil mastermind
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9218
  • Last login:August 21, 2015, 03:11:31 pm
  • Friends don't let friends build frankenpanels...
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #32 on: July 24, 2007, 08:39:46 am »

Clemens' problem wasn't form, it was a dead shoulder.  He spent the most of is last two seasons in Boston on the DL.  Pitchers don't regain their fastball in their mid 30s, just like running backs (with mileage) don't get better at 30.

Ryan was a freak and threw until his arm literally snapped on the mound.  That was ugly.

Sorry, you got the wrong person there. Dave Dravecky was the unfortunate soul who had the gruesome arm snap incident.

Ryan did tear a ligament in his final appearance, but the freak threw one more pitch before calling it quits....a 98 mph pitch....at ~46 years old. ;D

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #33 on: July 24, 2007, 09:10:27 am »

I remember watching that game.  His arm sure looked like it snapped.  The elbow came halfway back the wrong way.

shardian

  • Saint is the evil mastermind
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9218
  • Last login:August 21, 2015, 03:11:31 pm
  • Friends don't let friends build frankenpanels...
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #34 on: July 24, 2007, 09:23:45 am »

I remember watching that game.  His arm sure looked like it snapped.  The elbow came halfway back the wrong way.

Do you mean the actual elbow looked like it was flopping around during the pitching motion? If so, that is what a pitchers elbow looks like in slow mo during delivery. One time, the analysts were going over Andy Pettittes delivery, and when his forearm started forward, his elbow looked ridiculously broken. It was frikkin gross and unnatural looking.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #35 on: July 24, 2007, 09:26:53 am »

I played baseball for nearly 15 years and have coached it another ten.  I know what a pitcher's elbow looks like during delivery.

His forearm was flopping wrongly between pitches.  He was very obviously injured and was too damn stubborn to come off the mound... then it was worse after the next pitch and he was done.

Ryan was one of my idols as a kid... Nolan Ryan, Pete Rose ( :banghead: :banghead: ), Carl Yastrzemski, and Steve Grogan.

Dervacumen

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1080
  • Last login:June 12, 2024, 01:58:21 am
  • Home of Three Squares dice game
    • Beaker Games
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #36 on: July 24, 2007, 12:08:38 pm »
I'm a Giants fan and I stopped watching games about 3 years ago since they suck so bad and invested everything into Mr. Bonds.  He makes them a lot of money, and it's a business after all.
That said, I'll probably try to catch a few at bats here and there.
I could care less about the steroid issue.  I don't care if he's a jerk.  I want entertainment.  He's entertaining and fun to watch.  When I lived in LA I used to go to a lot of Giants/Dodgers games and sit out in left field in about the same spot, pretty close to the fence where the Dodger pitchers warm up.  My wife and I always wore our Giants gear and had to take a lot of crap from the Dodger's fans.  And every game we went to, Barry saw us up in the stands and tipped his hat and smiled.  So there.  Of course that was in the early 90's when he wasn't as jaded by all the negative stuff he has to deal with.  Not that he didn't invite it himself.

I just want the Giants to put a good product on the field some day.
Bringing to life a child's imagination.

DrewKaree

  • - AHOTW - Pompous revolving door windbag *YOINKER*
  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9740
  • Last login:May 15, 2021, 05:31:18 pm
  • HAH! Nice one!
    • A lifelong project
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #37 on: July 24, 2007, 09:00:37 pm »

I played baseball for nearly 15 years and have coached it another ten.  I know what a pitcher's elbow looks like during delivery.


You'd be the first to point out the vast difference between pro football, semi-pro football, and a flag football game.  You didn't play in the majors, you didn't coach in the majors, therefore you do not, in fact, know what a major-league pitcher's elbow looks like during delivery or what it actually means to his motion.  The best you can claim is that you played against or coached someone who may have made it to the majors.  The time between them making it to the majors and when you saw them could and most likely would involve improvement and an increase in something you wouldn't have seen, something that made them even more effective.

Shardian stated that Ryan effed a ligament up.  You even stated that it "looked" like it snapped, not that you were certain of it when he questioned what you saw.

Carry on.
You’re always in control of your behavior. Sometimes you just control yourself
in ways that you later wish you hadn’t

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #38 on: July 24, 2007, 09:04:03 pm »

For something like the supernatural looking way a pitcher's arm bends, all you have to do is watch a lot of MLB on TV.  If I don't know, then certainly Sharidan doesn't know for the same reason, and we're both ignorant.

 :)

BTW, ligaments snap too, and it is more frequent and sometimes more ugly than a bone break, beacuse the joint will just flop the wrong way under force.

DrewKaree

  • - AHOTW - Pompous revolving door windbag *YOINKER*
  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9740
  • Last login:May 15, 2021, 05:31:18 pm
  • HAH! Nice one!
    • A lifelong project
Re: So who is going to be watching the Giants games for the next week?
« Reply #39 on: July 24, 2007, 09:10:38 pm »

I could care less about the steroid issue.  I don't care if he's a jerk.  I want entertainment.  He's entertaining and fun to watch. 


The steroid issue and him being a jerk detract from the entertainment and "fun to watch" aspect.  If they didn't, you wouldn't have even noticed or mentioned that he was a jerk because you would simply find him entertaining.  His asinine behavior detract from his on-field performance, you're just willing to endure a higher amount of it than others for reasons that are personal to you.  His behavior is a result of what you rightly pointed out as well - he invited this stuff on himself.

I have had exactly one "encounter" with the man, and it wasn't favorable.  My kid was too small and was being pushed out of the way by other autograph whores, so I told him to stand off to the side and I'd get a ball signed by him.  He never signed it, and stood there making snide comments about me being "one of those guys who'd turn around and cash in on his signature", glancing over at me periodically so I got the point that he was speaking to me. 

When I had had enough, I took my kid by the hand and moved back to the place where I was standing, put the ball in my kid's hand, and helped him lean over the railing, at which time the jackass said "all done for today guys, see you at the next game".

He's a first-class a-hole in my book, and it's all because he thinks more highly of himself than he ought.  The jackass should try a real job someday, and he might lose a third of that chip he carries around on his shoulder about how he's "persecuted".  I put more stock in what Jessie and Al have to say, and it's well documented around here how I feel about those two.

I do believe I wouldn't piss on Bonds to put him out if he were on fire. :soapbox:
You’re always in control of your behavior. Sometimes you just control yourself
in ways that you later wish you hadn’t