If all of the questions have been asked and people just search for the answers, how will any new information get communicated? Some threads go on for pages and pages while the issues get sorted out (see the new Topgun thread). In 6 months if someone asks what gun options are available, I'm not going to point them to that thread, I'll give them the skinny on it.
#1. If it's in the FAQ or a sticky, there's no excuse as those are set up to supply maximum info in minimum space. Oh crap, I'm rambling.
Perfect examples are things like "How do I set up MAMEWah?!" or any other software questions - the answers are always changing, so the old responses aren't necessarily the answer you're looking for TODAY.
It reads as if that ENTIRE list of points has been interpreted to mean "don't ask a question about ANYTHING if there's a SHRED of information on it, even if it DOES NOT pertain to your question or DOES NOT answer your question." I'd thought that anyone reading beyond the first three "search" points would have realized the rest of the points laid out would have answered, helped, or better refined the views that've been laid out.
Allow me to clarify. These should be used as an overall GUIDE, they do NOT rule out asking questions, and PREVIOUSLY correct replies can and do change, necessitating new and improved replies.
The points you've both raised are identical to the forum this was taken from. Improvements or changes there to established procedures (to parallel the MameWah install example) can and do occur DAILY. The reason the search was highlighted as it was is the fact that a large number of people DO NOT use the search or (for an example here) input something generic like "pushbuttons", view the brazilian pages and say "I can't sift through all of these threads". Give this a closer read and see if something jumps out at you

that's not often done, something that SHOULD pertain to the points both of you made:
- If you have some issue which you expect to be solved with help on the forum, GIVE DETAILS of what you tried yourself.
Cowbell, why WOULDN'T you point someone to the Topgun thread in a few months if they asked what gun options were available? Without any details OTHER than "what gun options are available", why NOT give them that link along with "giving them the skinny" on it? Wouldn't it be possible that they can extract information from that thread or improve on the ideas within? Why would you limit someone in that fashion? Also, your points contradict themselves. If something IS in a FAQ or Sticky, and you say that's common sense to look there, which would answer the question, how can you then say "it's good for someone to bring up the same question/point every once in a while". Either there's no excuse for the question, or it's common sense to look there.
Thebrownshow, wouldn't the query "how do I set up MameWah" need some more info, or would you just assume they meant the most recent version? Wouldn't them giving you DETAILS point to you NEEDING to help them out, since all the tutorials/walkthroughs would be for versions different than what they'd tell you, OR, perhaps they'd still apply to their version!
Maybe you guys dismissed this after reading into the first three points as "SHUT UP NOOB, DON'T ASK ABOUT A DANG THING AROUND HERE, DAMMIT!", but certainly you can agree the above quote counteracts the idea that no questions should be asked, yes? And since you've been here a while, you should also be able to see that it's
NOT often said to "Search, it's in here"
Ninja, I borrowed 'em to post here, why not borrow 'em yourself?