but not at the expense of people who are stock piling manure and diesel and are members of an organisation linked to mindless terrorism.
Why did you feel the need for this second part at all? You are linked to terrorist organisations in many ways, for example the gentlemen's deal with Indonesia for the natural resources all those years ago. Now it turns out this country was involved in corrupt Saddam dealings as well. Thought crimes are a
bad idea.
But what's interesting to me is that I don't understand why you need to differ from the 'flaming liberals' at all. Surely it shouldn't matter in the slightest
what organisation you are part of if you are stockpiling chemicals? If I blow up a school bus because I hate kids, or I blow up a hospital because my Lord Darwin tells me only the strong should survive, why is that different from someone blowing up a builiding because they expect to get 100 virgins?
Again, to be clear, I think all of these people should be interrogated and leads should be followed in order to determine what Conspiracy crimes have also been committed, and should that lead off-shore by all means let's play ball with other intelligence organisations. But the fact that my brother once dated a girl whose cousin is a member of Al Jazeera should
not give the Government unlimited powers to detain me unknown to anyone else at any time they feel it is in 'the national interest'.
Usually what happens in these cases is the people who live in that house get the full crime, and their friends will get accesory or conspiracy charges since you can't prove *they* were also helping to build the bomb. If we are real lucky, we'll hit the jackpot with each of their names appearing on a receipt for each different component, but Bad Guys(tm) are rarely that easy to nail in the Real Word(tm).