In an effort to work and form a bipartisan coalition, I say we ask Sandy Berger to look at the document and stuff it down his pants, since destruction and removal of classified documents is evidently something not worth caring about, this memo should gain even LESS notoriety if he ganks it. I don't even care where he stuffs it....socks, pants....heck, makes a diaper and puts his junk all over it and craps in it.
For someone who rails over and over again about the war, you certainly seem not the slightest bit concerned about "getting to the truth" of whether the guy with the khaki doc(uments)kers destroyed or took, and the why behind his actions. Even your nose is partisan, since this doesn't reek at all to you

For all the "appealing to the core" of the party claims, I'm wondering how that could be, since you've demonstrated that America was behind your opinion on this case...not just Democrats, America! Nothing adds up there, yet it's a top story. An NSA is stealing and destroying classified documents and it's a top story.....on page 12?
Kinda funny Mr Lauten(Sandy)berg(er) would say "Those who would attempt to influence debate in the United States Senate should not hide behind anonymous pieces of paper". The people looking to influence debate on his side didn't have to hide behind anonymous pieces of paper....they made the pieces of paper anonymous.
NOW you wish to castigate someone for not reading memos, yet any Dem who couldn't be bothered to read memos relating to Iraq (Ms Boxer, Mr Kerry, anybody home?) was given a pass by you? They should ALL be reading the crap they have typed up, but to now jump on your sanctimonious soapbox? How was it put? "Hippocrit"?
Hey, you're prolly in a better position to tell us...ol' Sandy didn't suffer any nasty paper cuts did he?
