but thats not what the instance IS
others in there chose to use specific numbers, and others there (IIRC) used the specific %. What Dartful is pointing out, and that you, for some illogical reason can't seem to get, is that the pic he linked to is showing a dolt who doesn't understand that 48% is not 50%.
and seriously, the oregano jokes are getting old.
you would prefer fennel, monsieur?

Why not just BEG me to continue making oregano jokes!

Hes saying 49% (which it is in actuality if you count independant votes) isn't half.
in
actuality we give
independent votes to
independent candidates, like your Mr Badnarik. If you want to use that flawed logic, then I am well within my flawed logic rights to assume that all independent votes would have gone to Bush and that Bush actually had 5
2%.
Again, I'll have to insist that you stick to the "simple math" that you can't seem to grasp
its ---Bad words, bad words, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when saint censors you?--- close.
now really, is cussing necessary? Is it the oregano in your system?
Oh, and again, you simply MUST realize that while in your mind it may be "---Bad words, bad words, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when saint censors you?--- close", you still can't state accurately that it's half. Speaking of close, I believe you're "close" to the truth. Take the next step and admit that 51% is 3% more than 48%.
Or, if it will make you feel better to count the independent votes in with the major party, take the next step and admit that 52% is 4% more than 48%.
Barring all that, give this a whirl

Repeat as necessary until simple math no longer eludes you.
hes attacking them because they are 1% off. sorry, thats pretty frivilous
actually, they're 3-4% off. Go ahead, check my numbers out. They add up any way you slice it. Oh, and he's attacking them because they can't get the facts in their apology correctl

As for being frivolous, I think we can both agree that hitting you with an orange would be pretty frivolous, yes? Let me try it with 3 million oranges.
