Unfortunately, replacing the obviously bad MOSFET, the 61 Ohm with a 68 Ohm, most of the film caps, a few leaky electrolytics, and a couple bypass caps in the horizontal section didn't do much. I'm leaning towards a full recap. Again. I've tested the diode in circuit and the resistors close by the MOSFET. The only thing in the horizontal secion I can't test are the small transformers. They have a unique part number that I haven't been able to find:
LL-224-023-00
and
LK-228-050-00
Does anyone know what these are?
EDIT:
I did a bunch of more testing. This monitor is a strange beast. At any resolution other than 400x254, even 15KHz, I can get the pro menu (hold MENU UP when powering on the monitor) and those resolutions do not have any horizontal linearity issues. The screen compresses slightly in all four corners but it's not that noticeable. However, in 400x254, I can't get the pro menu, just the standard menu. I thought maybe the pro menu would be helpful here because it does have a horizontal linearity adjustment, but it never adjusts the right side of the screen, only the left (again though, this menu isn't available in 400x254). Also, in either menu, I can't seem to RECALL my settings. I think I was able to before.
Since I replaced those film caps and MOSFETs, I notice the picture no longer can wrap around itself when I do the horizontal positioning. I also actually think the linearity is slightly better.
Unfortunately, that MOSFET was tied into the proprietary IC on the board. If the MOSFET fried, I wonder if it took out the IC as well. That particular pin on the IC must have been for something like this 15KHz mode, because it's not used on the 30KHz variants that I have a schematic for. I almost get the feeling it has to do with turning on those S-correction caps.
I might give this thing one more go and replace the rest of the caps I found that were slightly leaking. I'll check the diodes and transistors as well. Maybe I'll try and identify the IC. Unfortunately, this is all close to exceeding my skillset. I don't have an oscilloscope and don't feel comfortable enough working on monitors while they're powered on.
EDIT 2 (FINAL, SUCCESS):
- I gave it another go and replaced 2/3 of the high voltage film caps (DigiKey didn't have stock).
- I also reflowed the solder on the small transformers and large coils.
- I also tested and replaced a bunch of the aluminum electrolytic caps, with a few in the horizontal section. I replaced them all with Panasonic FR caps, which are extremely low ESR.
Many of the caps I tested were approaching or above 1 Ohm. They were all Nichicon caps from my first cap kit.
- I replaced C91 (2000uF, 35V). Despite it testing OK, it gave off the classic leaky fishy smell when I desoldered it.
- I tested all resistors, transistors, and diodes in the horizontal section. As far as I can tell, the blown MOSFET didn't affect anything else.
I wasn't too optimistic after doing all this work. And despite the Recall feature working again and the picture being absolutely amazing, at that one screen size, there is still significant right-side compression. I think this monitor might have been this way from the factory. One last ditch effort was to change my MAME configuration. Low and behold...
First I tried adjusting as much as I could in ArcadeOSD, but nothing seemed to help.
I'm running GroovyMAME 0.178. I do this because it has the best support for the old ATI card I am using. I turned off modeline_generation in mame.ini so GroovyMAME would use the modelines generated by VMMaker instead of generating them on the fly. Despite the two pieces of software having the same monitor configuration, the generated modelines for the Midway games were different... 400x256p @ 16.7KHz instead of 15ishKHz. I couldn't believe it too when the geometry at that modeline was ABSOLUTELY PERFECT. I mean, it's bang on now! I tried a bunch of different games and they all had perfect geometry as well.
So:
1. I have no idea what that MOSFET was doing.
2. All the components I replaced probably did nothing more than extend the life of my chassis.
3. My geometry issues appear to have been fixed in software.
In short: success?