Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?  (Read 3686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

crtrrss

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
What is the most lightweight OS that is capable of running MAME and a FE? I have a bunch of really crappy P4-based PCs and Ubuntu just doesn't seem to cut it on them. Everything is way too sluggish on it. Is there anything smaller that can be used?


Thanks,



Carter

ballboff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Last login:July 22, 2024, 02:25:17 am
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2014, 02:54:27 am »
Mmmm... depends on what the p4 speed is.  I'm using a p4 on my main machine which is a 2.8.  Mine runs fine with windows 7 and a SSD and mala frontend.  I didn't even install a lite version of the OS either.  I have disabled all transition effects.

empardopo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 05:12:51 am
    • My personal forum
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2014, 03:09:24 am »
I'm using a PIII with a lite XP version and it works fine with MALA.
Greetings!

ballboff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Last login:July 22, 2024, 02:25:17 am
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2014, 04:24:40 am »
Also depends on what games you're playing I guess.  None of the more recent king of fighters games would work.  I'd say from about 94 onwards you might have issues.

adder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 640
  • Last login:February 04, 2021, 10:51:51 am
  • Location: Easy St.
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2014, 04:56:28 am »
i got good results using 64bit mame with 64bit windows xp, using a P4 cedar mill 3.4ghz.   if u dont have that option then use microXP 32bit.

elvis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1154
  • Last login:January 13, 2025, 08:48:40 am
  • penguin poker
    • StickFreaks
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2014, 06:57:11 am »
What is the most lightweight OS that is capable of running MAME and a FE? I have a bunch of really crappy P4-based PCs and Ubuntu just doesn't seem to cut it on them. Everything is way too sluggish on it. Is there anything smaller that can be used?
Like most people, with Ubuntu you're running a bloated desktop distro underneath your emulator and front-end that's completely unnecessary.

I've written a post previously about this, with a guide on how to disable all of the bloated desktop stuff, 3D compositing engine, and do away with everything other than just the raw video output part (Xorg):
http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,135914.0.html

It is a little technical, but particularly with modern, heavy, desktop-focussed Linux distros, it can save quite literally gigabytes of memory and gain quite a bit of speed.

Malenko

  • KNEEL BEFORE ZODlenko!
  • Trade Count: (+58)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14019
  • Last login:July 02, 2025, 09:03:11 pm
  • Have you played with my GingerBalls?
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,142404.msg1475162.html
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2014, 07:57:56 am »
Also depends on what games you're playing I guess.  None of the more recent king of fighters games would work.  I'd say from about 94 onwards you might have issues.

Any game Neo Geo MVS based would run fine. So all the way up to King of Fighters 2003 and SNK vs Capcom:Chaos.


Op: If the hardware is a slug I think your best bet would be XP Lite.
If you're replying to a troll you are part of the problem.
I also need to follow this advice. Ignore or report, don't reply.

ballboff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Last login:July 22, 2024, 02:25:17 am
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2014, 08:42:46 am »

Any game Neo Geo MVS based would run fine. So all the way up to King of Fighters 2003 and SNK vs Capcom:Chaos.

mmmm...  didn't have as much luck with mine.  Had issues with king of fighters millennium and strider 2, which are both from 1999 I think.  Also mr driller I had similar issues with performance.  I also had issues with street fighter alpha which was a few years earlier, 1995 I believe.

Malenko

  • KNEEL BEFORE ZODlenko!
  • Trade Count: (+58)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14019
  • Last login:July 02, 2025, 09:03:11 pm
  • Have you played with my GingerBalls?
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,142404.msg1475162.html
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2014, 10:45:00 am »
mmmm...  didn't have as much luck with mine.  Had issues with king of fighters millennium and strider 2, which are both from 1999 I think.  Also mr driller I had similar issues with performance.  I also had issues with street fighter alpha which was a few years earlier, 1995 I believe.

KOF Match of the Millennium was a NeoGeo Pocket Color game. Capcom vs SNK, Capcom Vs SNK Pro, and Capcom Vs SNK 2 :Millennium Fight 2000 were based on Naomi (Dreamcast) Hardware, not MVS.

Mr.Driller ran on Namco System 12 hardware , which is an upgrade from Sony's PlayStation-based System 11, the MIPS R3000A microprocessor is 50% faster, and the C76 sound processor is replaced by the H8/3002. But its just a glorified PS1.

Strider 2 ran on the Sony ZN-2 platform (aka System 16) which is just another improvement over the playstation hardware (more ram, medium res support, etc)
If you're replying to a troll you are part of the problem.
I also need to follow this advice. Ignore or report, don't reply.

ballboff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
  • Last login:July 22, 2024, 02:25:17 am
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2014, 03:14:19 am »
mmmm...  didn't have as much luck with mine.  Had issues with king of fighters millennium and strider 2, which are both from 1999 I think.  Also mr driller I had similar issues with performance.  I also had issues with street fighter alpha which was a few years earlier, 1995 I believe.

KOF Match of the Millennium was a NeoGeo Pocket Color game. Capcom vs SNK, Capcom Vs SNK Pro, and Capcom Vs SNK 2 :Millennium Fight 2000 were based on Naomi (Dreamcast) Hardware, not MVS.

Mr.Driller ran on Namco System 12 hardware , which is an upgrade from Sony's PlayStation-based System 11, the MIPS R3000A microprocessor is 50% faster, and the C76 sound processor is replaced by the H8/3002. But its just a glorified PS1.

Strider 2 ran on the Sony ZN-2 platform (aka System 16) which is just another improvement over the playstation hardware (more ram, medium res support, etc)

Ah ok fair enough.  I misread your post before, I didn't realise you were just on about mvs hardware.  PS1 and dreamcast hardware, that explains why I can't emulate them very well.

I meant king of fighters 99 millennium battle, but yeah I get your point ;)
« Last Edit: September 25, 2014, 03:37:32 am by ballboff »

keilmillerjr

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1847
  • Last login:October 06, 2023, 10:20:39 pm
  • Web Developer.
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2014, 10:58:06 pm »
What is the most lightweight OS that is capable of running MAME and a FE? I have a bunch of really crappy P4-based PCs and Ubuntu just doesn't seem to cut it on them. Everything is way too sluggish on it. Is there anything smaller that can be used?


Thanks,



Carter

You do know that there is more lightweight distress of ubuntu, right? Attract-mode front end is awesome and linux compatible.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFlavors

Malenko

  • KNEEL BEFORE ZODlenko!
  • Trade Count: (+58)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14019
  • Last login:July 02, 2025, 09:03:11 pm
  • Have you played with my GingerBalls?
    • forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,142404.msg1475162.html
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2014, 07:32:45 am »
Ah ok fair enough.  I misread your post before, I didn't realise you were just on about mvs hardware.  PS1 and dreamcast hardware, that explains why I can't emulate them very well.

I meant king of fighters 99 millennium battle, but yeah I get your point ;)
All good, I figured you didnt quite get what I was saying, but Im glad this may have helped you figure out your emulation issues. All KOFs that run on the MVS hardware will all run at the same speed. Doesnt matter of its KOF94 or KOF99, its literally all the same hardware  :cheers:
If you're replying to a troll you are part of the problem.
I also need to follow this advice. Ignore or report, don't reply.

nitrogen_widget

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1782
  • Last login:May 23, 2025, 02:30:58 pm
  • I want to build my own arcade controls!
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2014, 08:10:51 am »
I use pclinuxos lxde for most low end systems or slitaz but pclinuxos doesn't have as vast a repository as Debian distros and slitaz will require you compile everything plus its finicky on certain hardware.

I've just started playing with antix 13.2 and its really low resource my test system boots up using 90mb of ram with desktop.
I haven't even turned off services I don't need like Bluetooth and printing.
Using Elvis's method once your comfortable with Linux would make it even lower on the resource usage.
Antix will also allow you to make a live CD of your system after you configure it the way you want


edit: changed antis to Antix.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2014, 04:42:42 pm by nitrogen_widget »

emb

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 335
  • Last login:September 14, 2018, 02:01:19 pm
    • Don Honerbrink
Re: Most lightweight OS that supports MAME (and preferably other emus) and FE?
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2014, 09:49:04 am »
Checkout xubuntu. Its optimized for a lightweight environment to run on older hardware. It uses xfce for the default desktop.

Website: www.xubuntu.org

"Xubuntu is an elegant and easy-to-use operating system. Xubuntu comes with Xfce, which is a stable, light and configurable desktop environment.

Xubuntu is perfect for those who want the most out of their desktops, laptops and netbooks with a modern look and enough features for efficient, daily usage. It works well on older hardware too."

Here is a video of it in action on my machine:
RetroFE on Linux: