If the stick itself completed a circuit, then either
A) The stick would have to touch 2 of the contact points
B) The stick would have to always be connected to a ground and would complete the circuit when connecting to one contact point
I don't think either of these designs are better than microswitch designs for 4-8 way sticks. People are pretty violent with joysticks when playing some games. Its one thing for a joystick to flip a switch. Its another for the joystick to directly contact the electrical circuit. Repair time/costs are easier when all you have to do is replace a microswitch.
For pressure-sensitive / variable throw... issues, the 49 way Happ or U360 work fine. On my U360s, there is no contact between the moving parts and the circuit board that determines which way the stick has moved.
I was wondering about the electrical aspect. What IG-88 suggests below could be a work around, though the accuracy might suffer. Wait, perhaps if the stick interrupted the current, similar to a switch being on 'no' ? No, that wouldn't work, because presumably the band sections would be in series....no, should be fine cos buttons are wired in series and they work independently, right?
By pressure-sensitive, I didn't mean analog-like, but simple pressure switches like on electrical instruments. Triggers. That might be the best, although they
would just be super short throw switches. I'd like that, though.
U360....yeah, I know, and this design would have to be economically competetive with current digital stick designs.