Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer  (Read 1727 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dkubarek

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 185
  • Last login:February 25, 2011, 01:00:32 am
Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« on: January 10, 2009, 05:40:41 pm »
I have Mame 1.059 and like it but I'm just getting into the hobby and I noticed newer rom sets are much easier to find. I have a 1.8 G Pent 4, gig of ram, and 80 gig hard drive. Should I upgrade to say, Mame v.129? I use a front end, Mala, and command line Mame. I also have Windows XP pro fairly-well optimized and dedicated to the cab. What are the pros and cons of doing so? I heard newer versions of Mame look better but run slower. What should I do?

Ummon

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5244
  • Last login:June 09, 2010, 06:37:18 pm
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2009, 08:53:21 pm »
I suggest .104 (not where the decimal place is, because Mame is inherently a beta status), or maybe .106 .
Yo. Chocolate.


"Theoretical physics has been the most successful and cost-effective in all of science."

Stephen Hawking


People often confuse expressed observations with complaint, ridicule, or - even worse - self-pity.

stephenp1983

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 691
  • Last login:March 24, 2024, 11:26:39 am
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2009, 09:54:33 pm »
I'm running mame .106 with a p4 1.6ghz processor and 512 ram.  It runs smoothly on most games you would want to play.

daywane

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2570
  • Last login:December 26, 2024, 11:02:08 am
  • GRRRR!
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2009, 07:49:02 pm »
I have Mame 1.059 and like it
I think others are telling you you have MAME .059
no such thing as MAME 1.0 yet
and I agree If you want more stuff any thing above  MAME .100 would be fine.
but not all games will run just right for you right off the bat.
I went to MAME .099 and MSPAC sound sucked!
I keep with .056 and .078
now I hear Big Buck Hunter is open  ;D I think I might just upgrade again

mrserv0n

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
  • Last login:May 25, 2021, 09:20:06 pm
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2009, 08:12:09 pm »
I suggest .104 (not where the decimal place is, because Mame is inherently a beta status), or maybe .106 .


Why .104? I 1.8 p4 will run .129 easy

daywane

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2570
  • Last login:December 26, 2024, 11:02:08 am
  • GRRRR!
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2009, 07:08:31 pm »
I suggest .104 (not where the decimal place is, because Mame is inherently a beta status), or maybe .106 .


Why .104? I 1.8 p4 will run .129 easy
last time I  tried to up grade MAME.
 It did not.
on a 2.6 P4
512 meg ram
64 meg agp vid card
xp sp2
sound was crap
« Last Edit: January 14, 2009, 05:57:35 pm by daywane »

dkubarek

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 185
  • Last login:February 25, 2011, 01:00:32 am
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2009, 07:13:54 pm »
So newer versions have poorer sound? Is that what I'm getting? I have it working now with .129 (I take the point about the decimal) but I also have a .105 version as backup. It's tough to get roms for the older versions, that's the problem. The gave run fast on it now. But I haven't even hooked the speakers up, so it might sound terrible for all I know.

u_rebelscum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3633
  • Last login:April 21, 2010, 03:06:26 pm
  • You rebel scum
    • Mame:Analog+
Re: Mame 1.059 vs. something newer
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2009, 04:33:15 pm »
So newer versions have poorer sound? Is that what I'm getting? I have it working now with .129 (I take the point about the decimal) but I also have a .105 version as backup. It's tough to get roms for the older versions, that's the problem. The gave run fast on it now. But I haven't even hooked the speakers up, so it might sound terrible for all I know.

Mame versions from 0.107 up to 0.128 have some timing issues in the sound on computers with LCD monitors (or monitors running @ 60 Hz).  0.129 still does, but is generally better (some people don't notice the improvement, others do).

Options have been added since 0.107 that try to address the timing issues, but how well they work varies from monitor to monitor (and monitor driver to driver, and video card to video card, and video driver to driver). :-\  The issue is based on that some video games originally ran at frequencies different than 60 Hz.  Further issues come when some "60 Hz" monitors really run at up to plus or minus 5% from the declared frequency, funking up the stuff mame tries to do to get around the original timing issue.

If you have a CRT running at 80 Hz (or have mame changing res & frequency), OTOH, you didn't notice any of the sound timing issues, and sound is actually better emulated in general (and have gotten a lot better on specific games).  (Blame the problem on LCD monitors. ;) )
Robin
Knowledge is Power