There are a few things to consider on a tube swap. (Not, by any means an expert....I just read a lot..and we ALL know everything on the Internet is true).
First off is pin compatibility. That has been mentioned in this thread. This is not necessarily a physical fit issue in as much as it is physical fit AND pin function. Some folks look at docs for a tube tester/rejuvenator to quickly figure that out. For example, if 2 tubes both use the same B&K socket number then they are pined the same. I have a Sencore tester. I can look up 2 tubes and see if the setup for my tester is the same. (My Sencore uses fewer sockets and accounts for different pin outs via rotary switches to set the pin function.)
Second is yoke. Generally, as I have seen, a typical yoke is classified, loosely, based on the impedance of the vertical windings. High or low. Here is where folks typically go to figure this out:
http://www.8liners.com/datatech/monitor.htmlSooooo if you have a tube that has the same physical and functional pin arrangements with a yoke that matches the impedance requirements of your chassis then you have a good swap candidate. Will it necessarily work? No. From reading various posts I would "guess" you chances for success would be around 50%. Success meaning you get a nice geometric (squares are squares, straight lines are straight lines) picture. Say about another 30% of the time you get a good pic. It’s not perfect, but good enough for government work. The rest of the time you get something but its way distorted. The reason for the variations is the differences in the yoke. 2 similar impedance yoke are not necessarily interchangeable. There are many other characteristics beyond that of its impedance. A yoke type would be matched to a chassis type so that these electronic characteristics jive. In a situation such as this you could then swap over the yoke from you bad tube to the good tube. To do that you have to disturb the purity rings which means you will have to re-converge. That is a whole other can of worms.