Hey,
Thanks a bunch to everyone who commented, I greatly appreciate it.
Just to make everything clear, the Control Panel I have now – I did not build this, but it came with the arcade when I bought it – has 2 Molex connections between the Control Panel and the arcade (You can sort of see this in the picture above). Between these 2 connections, they handle both the power for the controls and their output. Like Chris said, the Molex connections are tight, and really aren’t fast to plug and unplug. The only reason I wanted to keep them was just so I didn’t have to re-make the existing plugs.
However, from what you all have said, it doesn’t seem like Molex is the ideal thing to use in my situation. It seems like a lot more work and cost would go into Molex, than one of the other methods mentioned. Also, I don’t really like the concept of using more than one encoder. This seems expensive and wasteful, even if it is much quicker. It is way over my budget anyway.
Thus, I am greatly leaning toward using the straight-through parallel port cable setup that Buddabing mentioned. Even if it isn’t as speedy as cat5 cables would be, I would rather have all my controls in 1 or 2 connections, than in 4 or 5. Plus it seems a bit cheaper to use just one or two cables.
I have a question about the parallel port cable, though. Do these straight-through parallel port cables have a separate wire for each pin?
If they do have a wire for each pin, this raises the question, are there different types of parallel cables? I only ask because, I had at first wanted to use some parallel cables I already have, but after I played around with them, I found that running a current through one pin could be detected on a totally different pin on the other end of the cable. I assumed this meant that some of the pins ran off the same wire. Please correct me if I am wrong in this.
I have attached I picture of what I believe I need to do in order to use the Parallel cables.
Thanks again.
Just as it is,
Flip Willie