Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?  (Read 1897 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MartyNg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Last login:April 26, 2014, 11:37:48 am
Does anyone have a recommendation for a version of MAME that will run good on the following system while still playing a lot of games?

Win98SE
Athlon 750
192 Meg RAM

I NEED compatibility with games that take a while to play through in which people can jump in and out at will, such as TMNT, Simpsons, Tower of Doom, etc. Classics like Ms. PacMan and Galaga will also be played but will take a back seat. Gracias.

rohan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 371
  • Last login:December 30, 2011, 08:24:04 pm
  • I'm a winner.
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2006, 12:48:50 am »
Raine or MAME .36
It doesn't matter if you win or lose....it's how you play the videogame.

AtomSmasher

  • I'm happy to fly below Saint's radar
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3884
  • Last login:September 02, 2022, 03:50:10 am
  • I'd rather be rich than stupid.
    • Atomic-Train
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2006, 01:51:12 am »
I've been told versions 36 and 55 are the two versions people like to use for older systems, for your machine v55 should be good enough.  I had a similar machine, except it was 800mhz and win xp, and ran version 96 of mame, it was able to run all of the older games and several of the newer games without a problem.

MartyNg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Last login:April 26, 2014, 11:37:48 am
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2006, 05:39:22 pm »
I've been told versions 36 and 55 are the two versions people like to use for older systems, for your machine v55 should be good enough.  I had a similar machine, except it was 800mhz and win xp, and ran version 96 of mame, it was able to run all of the older games and several of the newer games without a problem.

Cool. Thanks guys! I'll try those versions out.  :cheers:

gonzo90017

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1034
  • Last login:June 23, 2019, 02:41:07 pm
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2006, 05:57:17 pm »
Is that 750mhz? Dude you can run almost everything with that! I would recommend you use fastmame84 http://files-upload.com/files/173598/fastmame084u3.zip
Just keep clicking in the "Show More" link in the bottom of the page until you get to 84. I'm currently using FastMame 71 with a 500mhz pc. I run all emulators including NeoGeo full speed! I didn't see a need to go up any higher since not many games have been added since then.

TMNT, Simpsons all those games will run full speed on your setup. All games run on mine with little to no frameskip!
« Last Edit: August 11, 2007, 04:47:25 pm by gonzo90017 »

danny_galaga

  • Grand high prophet of the holy noodle.
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8526
  • Last login:Yesterday at 02:12:44 am
  • because the mail never stops
    • dans cocktail lounge
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2006, 01:28:56 am »


i think with 750mhz you dont need to go as low as 36. i ran a 400mhz with 78, and it was mame32. games like raiden were too slow with that combo so id say start with mame 70 something and start going downwards if speed is too slow on your favs...


ROUGHING UP THE SUSPECT SINCE 1981

monkeybomb

  • PM me to find out how to get a custom title like mine!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1236
  • Last login:January 03, 2018, 07:16:29 pm
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2006, 01:42:29 am »
I used .83 on a PIII 550 for a long time and most games worked fine.

MartyNg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Last login:April 26, 2014, 11:37:48 am
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2006, 08:50:09 am »
Thanks to all for the information. I will definitely try out several versions of Fastmame. Being 'heavily optimized' from the main build of MAME, surely there is some sort of tradeoff. What might this be missing out on over the normal version of MAME?


gonzo90017

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1034
  • Last login:June 23, 2019, 02:41:07 pm
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2006, 07:38:52 pm »
There is none. Unless you consider command line a trade off.

MartyNg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Last login:April 26, 2014, 11:37:48 am
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2006, 08:25:25 am »
There is none. Unless you consider command line a trade off.

Interesting. Why don't the MAME developers implement these enhancements into the main build?

Dreamwriter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 139
  • Last login:August 28, 2010, 04:33:09 pm
  • Sleep is for the weak!
    • Games of Yore
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2006, 01:13:15 pm »
Because to the developers, Mame isn't about enhancements or running games quickly.  It's about documenting how the arcade hardware works by emulating it, and to do that they try to make the code easy to understand rather than uber optimized.  For example, a few games had Voodoo 3D cards in them.  But Mame doesn't just pass on the 3D commands to 3D cards, even in Mame 1.07 which can use Direct3D; it emulates the Voodoo 3D cards in software, and thus runs those games extremely slowly.

MartyNg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Last login:April 26, 2014, 11:37:48 am
Re: Best compatibilty/speed combo MAME version for low-end system?
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2006, 02:23:13 pm »
Because to the developers, Mame isn't about enhancements or running games quickly.  It's about documenting how the arcade hardware works by emulating it, and to do that they try to make the code easy to understand rather than uber optimized.  For example, a few games had Voodoo 3D cards in them.  But Mame doesn't just pass on the 3D commands to 3D cards, even in Mame 1.07 which can use Direct3D; it emulates the Voodoo 3D cards in software, and thus runs those games extremely slowly.

Ah. That makes sense! Thank you for clarifying.