Personally I hate LCD's....they ghost, the colours are not great, poor viewing angle
Sounds like your experience with LCDs has been limited to what you can find at garage sales. You might rethink this after trying newer ones.
While I agree LCDs have come a long way, IMO CRTs still have a higher quality image. I have yet to see an LCD than can match a CRT in all five of the following: colors, blacks, grey-to-grey speed (aka refresh speed, aka ghosting), viewing angle, and contrast. There are LCDs that can match 3 or come close to matching 4 of them, but at the sacrafice of the others.
LCDs can easily beat CRTs in other areas: sharpness, brightness, size, weight, energy use, temperature, burn-in, and rotation.
I miss my CRT.

Did they start to measure CRT's properly already?
Here in US, computer CRTs can still be quoted on the tube size but the viewable size is usually also quoted. TVs and arcade monitor must use the
viewable size.
The 21" CRT I have actually has a smaller display area than my 19"LCD. The 21"is measured for the whole tube or something and with LCD it's really the viewable area.
I had two 17" CRTs: the iiyama had a 16.1" viewable screen, the gateway had 14.9" viewable screen. (Point: you can't say all CRTs are like yours.)
So my 19" LCD in fact displays a bigger picture than the original 19" CRT in a classic cab (or even than a 21" for that matter).
Do not confuse PC monitors and arcade monitors. A 19" arcade monitor was 19" viewable (plus or minus 0.1" or so). So your 19" LCD is the same size as a 19" arcade monitor.
OTOH, your LCD is bigger than a 20" computer monitor. Some 21" computer monitors are bigger than your 19" LCD, some 22" computer monitors are smaller.