Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Does anyone use Hagstom Encoders anymore?  (Read 1206 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MannyTC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
  • Last login:May 12, 2003, 01:33:28 am
  • Jack Burton... Me!
Does anyone use Hagstom Encoders anymore?
« on: February 22, 2003, 10:06:18 am »
There used to be lots of talk about Hagstrom here. Especially when the KE72 and KE72-T were released. 72 inputs was the answer to everyones prayers at the time and I quickly snagged one up. Now, they are not mentioned much since the IPAC came out and now the Keywiz. Seems like they still have some good products to offer however.

The KE-USB36 USB Keyboard Encoder and Trackball Interface for $79 is a few bucks cheaper than buying an IPAC and Opti-PAC and is in a single device and has 36 inputs to boot. Yes I know it doesn't have a Shift or Shazaam button but I'm sure it would appeal to alot of people because of the greater number of inputs. Anybody try this encoder yet?


Homebrew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
  • Last login:May 03, 2012, 09:48:55 pm
Re:Does anyone use Hagstom Encoders anymore?
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2003, 11:25:06 am »
I use both the KE72 and the ME4.  I think the main reason you don't hear about them as much anymore is because they are pricey compared to an IPAC or Keywiz.  Also i think for most people, 72 inputs is just more than they'll ever need.  For me i wanted to leave myslef open with as many options as possible in future.  Ultimately i think its a an affordability thing.  IPAC is just easier on the wallet.

-Kevin

rampy

  • *shrug*
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2910
  • Last login:March 02, 2007, 11:32:16 am
  • ...as useless as a JPG is to Helen Keller
    • Build Your Own PVR
Re:Does anyone use Hagstom Encoders anymore?
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2003, 11:57:33 am »
The other thing is that don't the hagstrom encoders (I may be wrong) use a matrix where's ipac/key wiz use more "direct" input methodologies ?

(not that one way is better than another... but just pointing that out)

rampy

MannyTC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 44
  • Last login:May 12, 2003, 01:33:28 am
  • Jack Burton... Me!
Re:Does anyone use Hagstom Encoders anymore?
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2003, 02:56:12 pm »
Rampy, yes some of their encoders use a matrix. One of them is switchable for matrix or direct input. All the others are direct. The KE72 that I have and the newest 36 input/Trackball USB model are direct.