Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: plunge router vs standard router  (Read 1967 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Firebaall

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13
  • Last login:May 01, 2011, 11:26:24 am
  • I'm a llama!
plunge router vs standard router
« on: February 15, 2003, 03:46:10 pm »
Hey all,

Can anybody let me know what the difference between a standard router, and one with plunge capabilities?  I'm shopping for one to finish up a cab that I'm restoring.



Thanks!

-FB


Larry Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 53
  • Last login:September 01, 2004, 07:27:11 am
  • I'm a llama!
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2003, 04:40:59 pm »
a plunge router is one that lets you change the depth of the hole on the fly. Its saves you from making a starter hole.

donniet

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Last login:February 02, 2003, 05:54:30 pm
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2003, 04:42:07 pm »
A plunge router is easier (and safer) to make a cut anywhere in the middle of a board.

Personally I find it easier to set the depth of cut on a plunge router than a fixed base.  Fixed bases are usually easier for doing edge work since they arent as tippy as plunge based routers.

I own two plunge routers because they were the best deals when I was purchasing, but I have been looking for a good excuse to add a fix based to the collection.

To me, the most useful features that can be added in routers is variable speed and 1/2 collet.  Both are good features because of safety.  1/2 bits are stronger and variable speed is needed for large diameter bits.  Tip speed gets really fast when you have a 2 inch+ bit spinning at 22k rpm.

Donnie

schwefeljm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17
  • Last login:February 06, 2003, 02:24:36 pm
  • I'm a llama!
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2003, 05:44:30 pm »
A plunge router is easier (and safer) to make a cut anywhere in the middle of a board.

Personally I find it easier to set the depth of cut on a plunge router than a fixed base.  Fixed bases are usually easier for doing edge work since they arent as tippy as plunge based routers.

I own two plunge routers because they were the best deals when I was purchasing, but I have been looking for a good excuse to add a fix based to the collection.

To me, the most useful features that can be added in routers is variable speed and 1/2 collet.  Both are good features because of safety.  1/2 bits are stronger and variable speed is needed for large diameter bits.  Tip speed gets really fast when you have a 2 inch+ bit spinning at 22k rpm.

Donnie

Very true, very true.

Just how fast does the bit travel you ask, well, I will tell you

360o = 2 * pi Radiens (rads)

1 rad = the distance traveled, along a circle, equal to the radius of the circle

So, to find the distance that point X on a router bit travels during on revolution, take the radius of the bit, multiple by 2pi

In the case of a 2" bit, we get (rounded) 6.3 in/revolution

at 22,000 RPM that equals 138,630 inches/minute

ok, that is fast, but no one deals in inches/minute, so we convert to MPH

138,630 * 60 (minutes in an hour) = 8,317,800

8,317,800 / (5280 [feet per mile] * 12[inces per foot]) [inches per mile] =  131 MPH

130 MPH, now that is fast. if we increase that to a 2.5" bit, we get 163 MPH

33 MPH dif for just an extra 0.5"

That is why it cuts wood so smooth.

Jason

RoadhawK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
  • Last login:May 29, 2023, 02:15:28 pm
  • Arcade Junkie :)
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2003, 07:21:40 pm »
 :D Exquisitely put and very interesting. If i'm honest numbers terrify me but i can usually get there in the end  ;D

Firebaall

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13
  • Last login:May 01, 2011, 11:26:24 am
  • I'm a llama!
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2003, 10:56:17 pm »
Heh,

Thanks.

Found out Sears is having a sale next weekend, and the plunge model that sells for $400CND is gonna be half price.....guess that settles it.  :)

Firebaall

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13
  • Last login:May 01, 2011, 11:26:24 am
  • I'm a llama!
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2003, 10:58:58 pm »
Opps, before I forget......

I want to counter sink a kickpanel ( 1/8" sheetmetal ) around the base of the cab.  From what I gather a rabbiting/straight bit is the way to go.  Yes?


eightbit

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1849
  • Last login:September 07, 2019, 07:38:11 pm
  • My cab is never done...
Re:plunge router vs standard router
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2003, 05:12:38 pm »
I want to counter sink a kickpanel ( 1/8" sheetmetal ) around the base of the cab.  From what I gather a rabbiting/straight bit is the way to go.  Yes?
Make sure its a plunge or bottom cutting bit.
My statements are my own opinions. They have the value that the reader gives them. My opinion of my opinion varies between foolish and brilliant and these opinions often change with new information.