So if YOU were going to put a barrier between Syria and Iran...where would YOU put it?
Not for nothing, but Saddam's Iraq was a pretty serious barrier between Syria and Iran. Hussein had his borders sealed up pretty tight, and no one moved around without expressed permission from the Baathists. Iran was his mortal enemy, and Al Qaeda despised his secularism. Iraq
was one of the most progressive secular states in the middle east before we attacked it. However, religious extremists and terrorists seem to be running wild throughout the country now. There has been
a rash of "acid attacks" on unveiled women, and leading clerics in the country are expressing a further desire to return to a more fundamentalist law.
Furthermore, now that we've sort of created this power vaccum in the region, it looks like we're on track to creating a Islamic Anti-Western "Super State", if this latest headline from the BBC is to be believed, "
Iranians to train Iraq's military."
All together, I'd say it looks like we could have saved 300+ billion and countless lives had we just left things as they were, if a barrier between Syria and Iran was the ultimate goal, as you suggest.
But I digress.
mrC