Actually, no one is debating it because it's not debatable.  Law did the things I say he did and it is documented.  The Pope did what I say he did and it is documented.  These are facts, clear, true, and easily proven.
Agreed. I think the bitter-sweet irony is that the people who are most horrified by this are the people who want to believe the message, but have only 
just now come to realise that you can't always trust the messenger. I think that scandals like these are worse than a million "evolution" papers, and the Church's indecision towards stomping down on them like an Old Testament God is (in hindsight) going to be one of the major causes of its slow and painful death march.  

Personally, I believe that any non-congregationally elected church is doomed, and haven't considered myself Catholic for a very long time. Because of that, the people I feel most sorry for are the abuse victims that still want to hold that membership even with what has happened to them. Having worked with people who have been traumatised, the 
key to their 
healing is never in 
punishing anyone**, but in them coming to terms with the fact that 
it's over. My main worry is how people can reach that point if they keep showing up every week to the exact same environment, denying themselves the kind of change that demonstrates their ability to retake 
ownership of their lives again?  
 
 ** = 'key' != 'everything', so in a case where someone is a repeat offender locking them up may be the only way to make it 'over'. Just that it is the 
stopping that is most important, not 
punishing. Having 50% of the worlds' Catholics switch denominations next Sunday is going to do more good in the 
long term than simply having a few dozen priests locked up (although I would like to see both happen).