Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick  (Read 1091 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jimmyjet

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 153
  • Last login:June 03, 2008, 06:39:55 am
  • I'm a llama!
hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« on: December 20, 2004, 10:24:56 am »
In the jakks 5-in-one there is a pot that controls Pole Position.  There are three wires going to that pot.  Can I hook those three wires to a new joystick (one to left, one to right, and one to common gnd) and have the joystick control Pole Position? 
I want to replace the POS joystick with a better one and want to try controlling Pole Position through the joy as well.
Thanks for any thoughts on this hack.
jim

Minwah

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7662
  • Last login:January 18, 2019, 05:03:20 am
    • MAMEWAH
Re: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2004, 02:02:17 pm »
It might work, but since it would be digital rather than analog you would lose a lot of control and the gameplay would be crap, IMO.  Like playing Pole Position with your cursor keys  :P

crashwg

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3076
  • Last login:May 24, 2019, 11:01:05 am
Re: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2004, 03:56:18 pm »
I could have sworn I read someone's post that stated that the joystick that's on it can also be used to steer and that they were having problems with pole position becuase they would accidentally engage the joystick while rotating it...  :-\
If there's bees in the trap I'm catching em
By the thorax and abdomen
And sanding the stingers down to a rough quill
Then I dip em in ink, and I scribble a bit
But if it they wriggle then I tickle em until they hold still
Lemme say it again
In my land of pretend
I use bees as a mf'n pen

LordDamo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 254
  • Last login:December 10, 2008, 04:26:05 am
  • Damn it Jim, im a doctor not a machine . . .
    • The Kinddom of Damo
Re: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2004, 10:33:21 am »
hook pole position up to something like this http://www.gunpowder.freeserve.co.uk/wheels/buildmain.htm

the wheel I mean

:-D
Religious war is like two kids fighting over who has the stronger imaginary friend . . .

Dav

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220
  • Last login:March 29, 2016, 05:39:35 am
Re: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2004, 02:11:11 am »
If you try it and your game still works let us know.  I suspect it won't.

I'm going to hack one too, but I haven't gotten around to taking mine apart so I'm not going to speculate too much.


LordDamo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 254
  • Last login:December 10, 2008, 04:26:05 am
  • Damn it Jim, im a doctor not a machine . . .
    • The Kinddom of Damo
Re: hacking mspac 5 in one pot and joystick
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2004, 06:31:12 am »
Have you looked at the site I posted? The steering wheel bit. It uses a pot to control the steering wheel, if this thing already has a pot with 3 wires, just extend the wires. You could even try reusing the same pot to make it a bit easier to config.

Hope this helps.
Religious war is like two kids fighting over who has the stronger imaginary friend . . .