Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor  (Read 12599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

StephenH

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 544
  • Last login:January 09, 2023, 06:15:45 am
  • I'm a llama!
Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« on: September 07, 2004, 03:27:31 pm »
http://www.retroblast.com/reviews/betson.html

Looks like a possible D9200 replacement

whammoed

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2310
  • Last login:July 18, 2025, 04:29:32 pm
  • Crack don't smoke itself
    • NiceMite
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2004, 07:42:53 pm »
It is indeed nice to have an alternative to the d9200 in case I would ever need it.  Options are always nice.  I do have to say though that my d9200 has been perfect so far.  Competition=good for consumer

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2004, 08:30:36 pm »
It is indeed nice to have an alternative to the d9200 in case I would ever need it.  Options are always nice.  I do have to say though that my d9200 has been perfect so far.  Competition=good for consumer

If only there were a 19" version of this.  I'd buy it in a heart beat.     :(

The 27" is just too big to me.
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

JoeB

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 628
  • Last login:June 27, 2025, 08:23:34 am
  • NES Fanatic
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2004, 09:44:27 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!   :o

http://www.kortek.co.kr/new/english/product/product_view.asp?idx=4&pnum=p01

Maybe once my WG 7191 dies on me, I'll order a 25" one as a replacement.   ;D

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2004, 10:16:16 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!   :o

http://www.kortek.co.kr/new/english/product/product_view.asp?idx=4&pnum=p01

Maybe once my WG 7191 dies on me, I'll order a 25" one as a replacement.   ;D


Dang, I don't think a 21" would fit ( I have a rotating monitor ).  If I remember correctly I have just under 23.5 inches wide to work with.   :'(
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

Patent Doc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 208
  • Last login:March 25, 2021, 12:07:33 pm
  • My wife says I'm the fastest man alive :(
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2004, 10:35:48 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!

I'm not so measurements refer to the screen size as is convention, but mounting size.  I say this because the Kortek site does not list a 27" monitor (they list 25" and 29").  Moreover, Kevin says he has the KT-2914.  Using Kortek's numbering convention (assuming Kevin's correct with his model number) a 27" monitor is a 29" monitor for Kortek.  Incidently, this would mean that they do have a 19" multisync monitor.  Good news for you Telengard.

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2004, 10:49:43 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!

I'm not so measurements refer to the screen size as is convention, but mounting size.  I say this because the Kortek site does not list a 27" monitor (they list 25" and 29").  Moreover, Kevin says he has the KT-2914.  Using Kortek's numbering convention (assuming Kevin's correct with his model number) a 27" monitor is a 29" monitor for Kortek.  Incidently, this would mean that they do have a 19" multisync monitor.  Good news for you Telengard.

Ooh ooh, that would be most excellent!!      ;D

My PC monitor is dying (although I will be sad to see the nice crisp vector games go)
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

AlanS17

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5382
  • Last login:December 02, 2019, 08:35:48 am
  • I won't even pretend to be clever...
    • AlanS17
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2004, 04:33:01 pm »
That does indeed look like a nice monitor. Too bad it's so expensive.


desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2004, 06:13:29 pm »
It'd be nice to know whether or not it stores multiple centering settings and just what frequencies it supports.  Does it support the whole range between 15.75-31.5 or just certain settings?  If it supports the whole range then it beats the d9200 hands down.  It would mean that you could have all your vertical games in vsync (.i.e. perfect emulation for all games, not just horizontal ones).  If it doesn't support at least a 1kHz at 15.75kHz and 25kHz then it's not really a contender for the d9200 which does.

I also think in fairness to wellsgardner that he should have mentioned that his d9200 broke when he was running it at 800x600 (which isn't recommended).
« Last Edit: September 08, 2004, 07:48:25 pm by desmatic »

Patent Doc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 208
  • Last login:March 25, 2021, 12:07:33 pm
  • My wife says I'm the fastest man alive :(
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2004, 09:03:23 pm »
Quote
I also think in fairness to wellsgardner that he should have mentioned that his d9200 broke when he was running it at 800x600 (which isn't recommended).

I don't recall Kevin ever saying this.  His monitor broke two days after he received it and WG replaced the board.  End of story.  It wasn't because he ran it at 800 x 600 as far as I can tell.  Don't give WG any excuses.  They have a great monitor, we're just learning it aint the best.

b3atmania

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 209
  • Last login:November 25, 2005, 09:48:57 am
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2004, 07:33:36 am »

Does the monitor 25kHz? I see this as very important as its required for many 90s arcade games.

Anyone know a dealer for this monitor in the Netherlands?

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2004, 08:02:05 am »
Quote
I also think in fairness to wellsgardner that he should have mentioned that his d9200 broke when he was running it at 800x600 (which isn't recommended).

I don't recall Kevin ever saying this.  His monitor broke two days after he received it and WG replaced the board.  End of story.  It wasn't because he ran it at 800 x 600 as far as I can tell.  Don't give WG any excuses.  They have a great monitor, we're just learning it aint the best.

In his first review he had a picture of his d9200 running at 35kHz (i.e. 800x600).  It's no longer there now, but it once was.  I remember emailing him about it, and I got the distinct impression that he didn't realize that he was overclocking the monitor, which makes me suspect he'd always run it at 800x600.  As to why it failed, who knows.  Could just as easily been a bad board. I've often wondered, though, how many failed d9200's were run at 800x600.  It's only fair to say that I don't really understand the obsession with this resolution.  It's not required for either MAME or movies.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 08:25:47 am by desmatic »

nilyash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Last login:March 25, 2014, 07:17:05 pm
  • Oh No not again!
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2004, 08:48:17 am »
It seems that there may be two versions of the Kortek the KT2914 and the KT2914F I believe that the F is their flat screen version so be carefully to order the right one. When I talked to one of their reps he defaulted to the flat screen version.

I have asked Eurocoin in the UK for price and delivery on the KT2914 and they said they will get back to me. That was three days ago and no news yet, I'll wait.

I also just talked to Kortek in Korea and their is no logistics or stock held in Europe yet so any order will have to be processed and shipped from manufacturing. They use DHL airfreight

Niylash

b3atmania

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 209
  • Last login:November 25, 2005, 09:48:57 am
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2004, 11:18:11 am »
I'm wondering about the memory:
- What exactly does it memorize? screen position, stretch position, V-hold, H-hold, pincushion et all? Or perhaps just a subset of those?
- How many resolutions can this monitor actually remember? When using AdvanceMAME I estimate you need memory for 200+ native resolutions.
- How does the memory compare between the D9200 and the Betson?

bdsjake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Last login:September 18, 2017, 12:08:23 am
  • livefree
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2004, 02:55:01 pm »
I've often wondered, though, how many failed d9200's were run at 800x600.  It's only fair to say that I don't really understand the obsession with this resolution.  It's not required for either MAME or movies.

Curious as to this statement.  True about MAME, but do others think that visual pinball looks better at 800x600?  I am able to move the data display out of the way of the playfiled, I think it looks better.  Also, some pc games look better at this resolution?  I just got the Dukem Nukem 2d game, I will try it at both resolutions this evening.  What about some of the other games from the other thread on "pc games to try on your cabinet", space tripper, mutant storm?  GTA?


Chris

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4574
  • Last login:September 21, 2019, 04:59:49 pm
    • Chris's MAME Cabinet
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #15 on: September 09, 2004, 03:23:22 pm »
Curious as to this statement.  True about MAME, but do others think that visual pinball looks better at 800x600?  I am able to move the data display out of the way of the playfiled, I think it looks better.  Also, some pc games look better at this resolution?  I just got the Dukem Nukem 2d game, I will try it at both resolutions this evening.  What about some of the other games from the other thread on "pc games to try on your cabinet", space tripper, mutant storm?  GTA?
Many PC games require 800x600 minimum.  I wouldn't run Visual Pinball at less than 1024x768.  Vector games look better at higher resolutions.  That's about it.  I run at 640x480 except for these exceptions, but I have a D9100 that'll go to 1024x768.
--Chris
DOSCab/WinCab Jukebox: http://www.dwjukebox.com

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #16 on: September 09, 2004, 04:47:21 pm »
The PC game argument is odd, but I don't play many these days, so I wouldn't really know.  I figure most games should be TV compatible, meaning 640x480, as a lot are also run on consoles.  800x600 on a tv requires stretching which most people go out of their way to avoid it if at all possible.  Same goes for the D9200 (as the tube is identical to a modern TV, meaning it only has 640 RGB triads).  Theoretically all games should have better clarity at 640x480 for these types of tubes, assuming the mode is supported.  And it won't make much of a difference for vector games, again because there's only 640 rgb triads.  So the only difference is a slightly tighter group of lines, not much percentage wise though.  From my take of it, things look a little blurry, which is what one would expect.  Certainly not smoother than 640x480.  Maybe a little brighter?  Though its been argued, I don't really see it personally.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 05:13:40 pm by desmatic »

Chris

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4574
  • Last login:September 21, 2019, 04:59:49 pm
    • Chris's MAME Cabinet
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #17 on: September 09, 2004, 04:58:26 pm »
The PC game argument is odd.  Most games should be TV compatible, meaning 640x480.  800x600 on a tv requires stretching which most people go out of their way to avoid it if at all possible.  Same goes for the D9200 (as the tube is identical to a modern TV, meaning it only has 640 RGB triads).  Theoretically all games should have better clarity at 640x480 for these types of tubes, assuming the mode is supported which should be the case for most games.
It seems like golf games, which are popular in cabinets, are offenders in this area.  I know PGA Championship Golf requires 800x600, and I believe Links and Tiger Woods do as well.  More recent console-style games will be designed to run well on TV's, but simulation style games that require lots of detail will be the opposite.  I guess my gaming tastes run more toward simulations and less toward console-style games, which is probably why I feel like many PC games need the higher resolutions.

--Chris
--Chris
DOSCab/WinCab Jukebox: http://www.dwjukebox.com

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #18 on: September 09, 2004, 05:11:16 pm »
The PC game argument is odd.  Most games should be TV compatible, meaning 640x480.  800x600 on a tv requires stretching which most people go out of their way to avoid it if at all possible.  Same goes for the D9200 (as the tube is identical to a modern TV, meaning it only has 640 RGB triads).  Theoretically all games should have better clarity at 640x480 for these types of tubes, assuming the mode is supported which should be the case for most games.
It seems like golf games, which are popular in cabinets, are offenders in this area.  I know PGA Championship Golf requires 800x600, and I believe Links and Tiger Woods do as well.  More recent console-style games will be designed to run well on TV's, but simulation style games that require lots of detail will be the opposite.  I guess my gaming tastes run more toward simulations and less toward console-style games, which is probably why I feel like many PC games need the higher resolutions.

--Chris

Fair enough.  I didn't know there were that many games out there requiring 800x600 or higher.  But still, one should be careful about running such modes on a 9200, at least the older models.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 05:12:32 pm by desmatic »

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #19 on: September 09, 2004, 05:34:11 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!   :o

http://www.kortek.co.kr/new/english/product/product_view.asp?idx=4&pnum=p01

Maybe once my WG 7191 dies on me, I'll order a 25" one as a replacement.   ;D


Dang, I don't think a 21" would fit ( I have a rotating monitor ).  If I remember correctly I have just under 23.5 inches wide to work with.   :'(

(Note to self: don't use a text broswer to post on BYOAC)

I called Betson and they do not carry the 19" version of this monitor, only the 27".  :(

Anyone have any ideas on alternate ways of possibly getting this monitor?
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 07:07:26 pm by telengard »
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #20 on: September 09, 2004, 07:10:02 pm »
According to Kortek, this monitor is available in sizes from 21" to 38" and even 32" wide!

I'm not so measurements refer to the screen size as is convention, but mounting size.  I say this because the Kortek site does not list a 27" monitor (they list 25" and 29").  Moreover, Kevin says he has the KT-2914.  Using Kortek's numbering convention (assuming Kevin's correct with his model number) a 27" monitor is a 29" monitor for Kortek.  Incidently, this would mean that they do have a 19" multisync monitor.  Good news for you Telengard.

Seems like I'm outta luck.  I called Betson and they do not carry the 19".   :'(
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2004, 06:25:58 pm »

In his first review he had a picture of his d9200 running at 35kHz (i.e. 800x600).  It's no longer there now, but it once was.  I remember emailing him about it, and I got the distinct impression that he didn't realize that he was overclocking the monitor, which makes me suspect he'd always run it at 800x600.

Actually, I only ran it at 800x600 when setting up my MAME cab for the first time - WindowsXP automatically forced the display into 800x600 during the install process. I left it there to take a few snaps, then switched over to 640x480. I ran 800x600 a couple of time for tests, but never long term.

The board failed 2 weeks into ownership. I have no idea if it was connected to the 800x600 installation mode, but considering the system only ran for a couple of hours in that resolution, I doubt it.

As to some of the Betson Questions:

1. Official specs mention memory settings for 6 custom modes. I've found that I've been able to fine tweak all my AVGA-MAME games for size and it's remembered every setting.

2. The Service Manual ( http://www.retroblast.com/files/KT-XX14X-SM.pdf) lists what settings get saved on a per-mode setting, and which settings are "universal" across all the modes.

3. Another source for the Kortek Monitors in the US is the (ta-da!) Kortek USA branch:

http://www.casinotech.com/KortekHome.html

A word of warning: they are not used to dealing with consumers, but rather arcade manufacturers. Still, they probably can get you the 19" version of the Kortek Multisync.

4. The Kortek site does list all the monitors as 2" bigger than they actually are. I suspect, as was mentioned here, that they are measuring by mounting space, not tube size.

5. A video review of the Betson is now online:

http://www.retroblast.com/video.html

6. Yes, I do love this monitor. Especially now that I can use a light gun!  ;D

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2004, 07:30:10 pm »

In his first review he had a picture of his d9200 running at 35kHz (i.e. 800x600).  It's no longer there now, but it once was.  I remember emailing him about it, and I got the distinct impression that he didn't realize that he was overclocking the monitor, which makes me suspect he'd always run it at 800x600.

Actually, I only ran it at 800x600 when setting up my MAME cab for the first time - WindowsXP automatically forced the display into 800x600 during the install process. I left it there to take a few snaps, then switched over to 640x480. I ran 800x600 a couple of time for tests, but never long term.

The board failed 2 weeks into ownership. I have no idea if it was connected to the 800x600 installation mode, but considering the system only ran for a couple of hours in that resolution, I doubt it.

As to some of the Betson Questions:

1. Official specs mention memory settings for 6 custom modes. I've found that I've been able to fine tweak all my AVGA-MAME games for size and it's remembered every setting.

2. The Service Manual ( http://www.retroblast.com/files/KT-XX14X-SM.pdf) lists what settings get saved on a per-mode setting, and which settings are "universal" across all the modes.

3. Another source for the Kortek Monitors in the US is the (ta-da!) Kortek USA branch:

http://www.casinotech.com/KortekHome.html

A word of warning: they are not used to dealing with consumers, but rather arcade manufacturers. Still, they probably can get you the 19" version of the Kortek Multisync.

4. The Kortek site does list all the monitors as 2" bigger than they actually are. I suspect, as was mentioned here, that they are measuring by mounting space, not tube size.

5. A video review of the Betson is now online:

http://www.retroblast.com/video.html

6. Yes, I do love this monitor. Especially now that I can use a light gun!  ;D

Kevin

Hey Kevin,

Thanks for the casniotech info.  I called them and they knew was I was talking about.  It would have to be special ordered.  I'm waiting to hear back on whether or not they could do it.  I've had to call them back twice to remind them so you are definitely right about dealing w/ individuals.  This would be the 19" I've been waiting for if I could get it.  Hopefully this will work out.  They seemed a little iffy about me buying just one.   :(
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html

DYNAGOD

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Last login:May 21, 2012, 07:01:55 am
  • sprites taste better than polygons
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2004, 08:24:28 pm »
"4. The Kortek site does list all the monitors as 2" bigger than they actually are. I suspect, as was mentioned here, that they are measuring by mounting space, not tube size."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

damn this still manages to confuse the hell out of me...

the review kevin made is for a 27" Multisync Arcade Monitor ..
meaning its ACTUALLY  25" inches Viewable

I have a taito egret with a nanao 29" monitor.. which has 27" viewable i believe:
meaning i would need a 31" Betson to replace that monitor correct?
Quote
« Last Edit: September 14, 2004, 08:25:59 pm by DYNAGOD »
Enjoying the fruits of technological obsolescence one game at a time...

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #24 on: September 14, 2004, 08:42:47 pm »
"4. The Kortek site does list all the monitors as 2" bigger than they actually are. I suspect, as was mentioned here, that they are measuring by mounting space, not tube size."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

damn this still manages to confuse the hell out of me...

the review kevin made is for a 27" Multisync Arcade Monitor ..
meaning its ACTUALLY  25" inches Viewable

I have a taito egret with a nanao 29" monitor.. which has 27" viewable i believe:
meaning i would need a 31" Betson to replace that monitor correct?
Quote

We're not talking about viewable size, just tube size. Thus, a 27" tube (25" viewable) requires a 29" mounting frame. At least, that's the way I'm interpreting Kortek's weird numbering system.

If you have a 29" picture tube, I would agree that the 31" Kortek is what you want, but note that Betson would list that monitor as a 29" monitor.

Clear? Yeah...as mud. :P
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2004, 08:57:37 am »

In his first review he had a picture of his d9200 running at 35kHz (i.e. 800x600).  It's no longer there now, but it once was.  I remember emailing him about it, and I got the distinct impression that he didn't realize that he was overclocking the monitor, which makes me suspect he'd always run it at 800x600.

Actually, I only ran it at 800x600 when setting up my MAME cab for the first time - WindowsXP automatically forced the display into 800x600 during the install process. I left it there to take a few snaps, then switched over to 640x480. I ran 800x600 a couple of time for tests, but never long term.

The board failed 2 weeks into ownership. I have no idea if it was connected to the 800x600 installation mode, but considering the system only ran for a couple of hours in that resolution, I doubt it.

Kevin

Fair enough.  Probably just a bad board.

Do you know what signals the betson can handle or how many modes it can store in memory?  More inportantly does the beston support the whole range listed range or is it like the d9200, which only supports 1kHz at each frequency, 15, 25, and 31 (which kinda sucks).  The whole range would mean a lot in terms of emulation capability.  Perfect emulation for all games, both vertical and horizontal.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2004, 08:58:13 am by desmatic »

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #26 on: September 15, 2004, 09:16:10 am »
Do you know what signals the betson can handle or how many modes it can store in memory?  More inportantly does the beston support the whole range listed range or is it like the d9200, which only supports 1kHz at each frequency, 15, 25, and 31 (which kinda sucks).  The whole range would mean a lot in terms of emulation capability.  Perfect emulation for all games, both vertical and horizontal.

See the following link for the service manual for the Betson, which lists a lot of information on what is saved with each custom mode. According to the Kortek document, six custom settings are saved, but I've yet to run into a resolution I've tried that didn't "remember" my custom tweaks.

KT-2914 Manual

http://www.retroblast.com/files/KT-XX14X-SM.pdf

Kortek Specs:

http://www.kortek.co.kr/new/english/product/product_view.asp?idx=4&pnum=p01

As to the 15/25/31Khz, the official specs are listed as 15-38Khz, no mention of "ranges" that it can grab. I certainly haven't had any problems with anything put out by the AVGA card, but I know it doesn't "do" 25Khz (yet  ;))

I'm willing to test a range of input frequencies, if anyone can suggest a way to do that.

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #27 on: September 15, 2004, 07:19:51 pm »
Do you know what signals the betson can handle or how many modes it can store in memory?  More inportantly does the beston support the whole range listed range or is it like the d9200, which only supports 1kHz at each frequency, 15, 25, and 31 (which kinda sucks).  The whole range would mean a lot in terms of emulation capability.  Perfect emulation for all games, both vertical and horizontal.

See the following link for the service manual for the Betson, which lists a lot of information on what is saved with each custom mode. According to the Kortek document, six custom settings are saved, but I've yet to run into a resolution I've tried that didn't "remember" my custom tweaks.

KT-2914 Manual

http://www.retroblast.com/files/KT-XX14X-SM.pdf

Kortek Specs:

http://www.kortek.co.kr/new/english/product/product_view.asp?idx=4&pnum=p01

As to the 15/25/31Khz, the official specs are listed as 15-38Khz, no mention of "ranges" that it can grab. I certainly haven't had any problems with anything put out by the AVGA card, but I know it doesn't "do" 25Khz (yet  ;))

I'm willing to test a range of input frequencies, if anyone can suggest a way to do that.

Kevin


Do you by any chance have a trident blade t64 or an Nvidia tnt32 card?

If you do I can build a bootable CD that will allow you to test it.

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #28 on: September 15, 2004, 08:08:38 pm »

I'm willing to test a range of input frequencies, if anyone can suggest a way to do that.

Kevin


Do you by any chance have a trident blade t64 or an Nvidia tnt32 card?

If you do I can build a bootable CD that will allow you to test it.

I might have a TNT2 in a box somewhere in the shop. Will that do?

Unfortunately, that's like saying I might have one somewhere on the continent. I'll take a look tonight, however, and report back.

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2004, 06:01:09 pm »

I'm willing to test a range of input frequencies, if anyone can suggest a way to do that.

Kevin


Do you by any chance have a trident blade t64 or an Nvidia tnt32 card?

If you do I can build a bootable CD that will allow you to test it.

I might have a TNT2 in a box somewhere in the shop. Will that do?

Unfortunately, that's like saying I might have one somewhere on the continent. I'll take a look tonight, however, and report back.

Kevin


A TNT2 card should work great.  I'll try to make a cd tonight.  I'll post it on my site for download.

PART 2:

Ok, it fit on a floppy, no CD necessary.  You can download the self extracting image at

http://www.msu.edu/user/jonesdes/files/advvboot.zip

To run the disk, boot your computer with it, follow the menu to advv.exe, and then test supported modes one by one.

Start with standard modes like 15.7 @ 60Hz, 25 @ 60Hz, etc.  Then feel free to test others at any range in between.  Just to play it safe have a kill switch so that you can turn your monitor off immediately if a mode is not supported or gives you snow. All the modes listed in blue should work.  If one doesn't work, then the stated supported frequencies for the betson are wrong.

The D9200 safely handles 1kHz at 15, 25, and 31.5 kHz.  Any other frequency throws snow.

While TNT2 cards should work perfectly, if the advv.exe utlity won't launch then your card isn't supported.  Note the advvboot disk is not configured for a trident blade t64, though it will work though with any other card that is supported by advancemame.

Thanks kev.  I've got my fingers crossed.  This monitor could the bomb.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2004, 08:05:57 pm by desmatic »

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #30 on: October 08, 2004, 09:12:53 pm »
First off, an apology - with all the site problems I've had recently, testing the monitor completely fell off my radar screen.

Thanks for the test utility - I'll see what I can do this weekend, if I can track down my TNT2 (time to clean the shop, which may take the entire weekend as it is!  >:( )

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #31 on: October 09, 2004, 07:39:44 am »
First off, an apology - with all the site problems I've had recently, testing the monitor completely fell off my radar screen.

Thanks for the test utility - I'll see what I can do this weekend, if I can track down my TNT2 (time to clean the shop, which may take the entire weekend as it is!  >:( )

Kevin

np.  Let me know if you need any help, particularly in finding the right video card.  Worst comes to worse, I could always send you one, though I'm no longer in the states, so it would take a while.  Right now, PNY or Visiontek TNT2 cards are the absolute best supported cards.

Hiub

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Last login:October 14, 2004, 10:06:04 pm
  • I'm a llama!
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #32 on: October 09, 2004, 02:38:46 pm »
Another Viable option would be to test the monitor using Powerstrip if you are running Windows. You can program it to display any custom resolution with custom refresh rates as well,  it is a great little app. If you guys wouldn't mind telling me, would i gain anything by running 15khz refresh rate on my tv through S-Video?

Thanks, Fred.

oven_toasted

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
  • Last login:October 14, 2004, 11:37:56 am
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #33 on: October 14, 2004, 11:50:00 am »
Had a question about the connections available on this monitor...  

In the review, a standard 15 pin VGA cable was used to connect the monitor directly to a computer.  In the PDF manual, it shows that the monitor is also capable of accepting a 5 pin or 6 pin signal, but is a little vague as to whether this requres additional parts and pieces, or if the connections are there on the board.  Are all the plugs actually present?

I'm looking into this monitor as a replacement for the 29" (27" viewable) Hitachi monitor in a Neo Geo candy cab that's currently set up to recieve it's input via an ArcadeVGA and J-Pac through the JAMMA harness.  I'd like to use the existing 6 wire hookup to the monitor so that the cabinet would still be able to use JAMMA PCBs, rather than just plugging the monitor directly into the VGA port on the computer (bypassing the JAMMA wiring entirely).

Is there any downside to using this sort of connection rather than the 15 pin cable?  Looking at the specs, it looks like it's ultimately getting the same signals to the monitor, so the functionality of the monitor should be unchanged...

Any insight would be appreciated.

--Chris

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #34 on: October 14, 2004, 01:28:04 pm »
Re: The connections

The custom VGA cable ends in a special plug that attaches to a 6-pin connector (I think it was six pin - can't easily check right now). You can unplug the DB15 VGA cable and use a standard Jamma connector, I believe.

The cable is screwed into a heatsink, but can be removed if you're not using it.

Re: 25mhz testing.

Guess what - I finally found my old TNT2 video card, buried deep in a pile of old computer parts in the shop. I'll try and use it to test the Betson's performance at 25Khz weekend.

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #35 on: October 17, 2004, 02:10:54 pm »
Re: The connections

The custom VGA cable ends in a special plug that attaches to a 6-pin connector (I think it was six pin - can't easily check right now). You can unplug the DB15 VGA cable and use a standard Jamma connector, I believe.

The cable is screwed into a heatsink, but can be removed if you're not using it.

Re: 25mhz testing.

Guess what - I finally found my old TNT2 video card, buried deep in a pile of old computer parts in the shop. I'll try and use it to test the Betson's performance at 25Khz weekend.

Kevin

Sounds groovy.  I'm really curious as to what it can do.

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #36 on: October 17, 2004, 06:43:19 pm »
Okay, here's the test results:

Everything you flagged as a supported frequency worked fine - even the 1024x768 res.

25Khz works fine.

Unfortunately, this test screwed up Windows and my AVGA card - even though I never booted into Windows during the test or with the TNT2 card, Windows XP has lost all the AVGA resolutions except 640x480 and 800x600. Even unistalling the device and reinstalling it in the Device manager doesn't do it.

Anyone got any ideas?

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

AmericanDemon

  • The Reason the short bus was invented... 100% Slacker Guaranteed, 4:20 yet?
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1357
  • Last login:September 22, 2019, 11:08:03 pm
  • Still an AmericanDemon
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #37 on: October 17, 2004, 07:40:45 pm »
Go into Safe Mode.  Clear out all of your video drivers.  Then reboot to desktop and reload drivers.

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #38 on: October 17, 2004, 08:49:26 pm »
Go into Safe Mode.  Clear out all of your video drivers.  Then reboot to desktop and reload drivers.

Be there, done that. Even used System Restore to backtrack to a time when things worked properly. No dice.

This is weird stuff.
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

clanggedin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1071
  • Last login:July 02, 2012, 11:08:55 pm
  • O'DOYLE RULES!!!
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #39 on: October 18, 2004, 12:38:34 pm »
I had something similiar happen to me once and I had to find the original driver CD for the graphics card and use it. It wouldn't work running updates and uninstalling the drivers in Windows. I had to use the driver cd that came with the card.

Too weird

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #40 on: October 18, 2004, 01:12:16 pm »
Yeah, I just finished removing the card, putting the TNT2 in, installing it in XP, uninstalling it, putting the AVGA back in, starting up in safe mode, and installing the AVGA drivers from the CD. It still refuses to show anything but 640x480 & 800x600.

I was planning on a system-wide update of my cab, but I really didn't plan on installing XP from scratch again. Now I'm thinking it may be the only way to get this situation resolved...

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #41 on: October 18, 2004, 04:38:47 pm »
XP is really experimental as far as advancemame is concerned.  Advancemame really runs best on Windows 98 and Linux.  But you don't need to install either of these, if you use the floppy disk below.  Just boot your system with the floppy disk and you'll be able to test any mode you want.

http://www.msu.edu/user/jonesdes/files/advvboot.zip


If you've got a spare fat partition available you could install easycab on it, should you be interested in running advancemame.

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #42 on: October 18, 2004, 05:21:15 pm »
I've actually got a spare HD in the cab, which I'm going to use for testing. But I need XP installed since I've got the cab hooked into the home network for updates and such.

It's looking more and more like a "tactical nuclear strike" (i.e., reformat and reinstall) is what I'm going to do. I just can't believe I can't get the AVGA to work properly after testing the Betson with the TNT2, especially when I never actually booted into XP with the other video card.

Ah, well...

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

desmatic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
  • Last login:June 25, 2006, 02:25:53 pm
    • Easy MameCab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #43 on: October 19, 2004, 03:40:13 pm »
ya, its a bummer, the old format, reinstall routine.  If you need any help with the XP install, let me know.  Slipstreaming SP2 really makes a difference in stability and it's pretty straight forward if you haven't tried it before.

DYNAGOD

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1163
  • Last login:May 21, 2012, 07:01:55 am
  • sprites taste better than polygons
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #44 on: October 22, 2004, 03:17:34 pm »
BEFORE YOU NUKE..

download this (dont run it yet)
http://www2.ati.com/drivers/cat-uninstaller.exe


go to device manager,

disable the ArcadeVGA,

DO NOT REBOOT when prompted,

go to add/remove programs:
uninstall ATI display drivers and ATI control Panel

reboot

run cat-uninstaller
(this will remove all traces of ATI from your machine,AN ABSOLUTE MUST if you plan on shuffling between manufacturers)
reboot.

reboot.

go to control panel and re-enable the card. cancel all install wizard popups.
and resintall the drivers and such from the ultimarc disk

reboot,

see if your resolutions have returned.

...
a last ditch effort before you wipe
« Last Edit: October 22, 2004, 03:22:53 pm by DYNAGOD »
Enjoying the fruits of technological obsolescence one game at a time...

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #45 on: October 22, 2004, 04:14:25 pm »
Heh...too late. It's nuked.  ::)

Strange thing is, it didn't help. Even a totally clean install of the AVGA card on a brand-new XP install didn't fix the problem, leading me to believe it isn't a software but rather a hardware problem.

Just for kicks, I tried your procedure (thanks for the link to cat-uninstaller, btw!). Same problem.

Corrupted videocard bios? Dunno. CMOS scrambled? No idea. I've been talking to Andy about this, and he's baffled by it as well. Figures I'd come up with a completely unique and new problem!

Anyway, I've ordered a new AVGA card, so I should be able to narrow down if this is hardware or software-related once I get the card. If the new card works, I'm mailing the old card back to Andy so he can figure out what in the world went wrong with it.

As a bonus, I'll be able to review the new 9200-based AVGA cards!

Just got my .87 MAME DVDs today, so a full reinstall isn't that bad of a way to refresh my MAME cab's setup...next up, MAMEWAH 1.52...

Kevin

<updated: MAMEWAH's now at 1.52!>
« Last Edit: October 22, 2004, 04:49:13 pm by KevSteele »
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

mwoody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Last login:June 28, 2005, 03:17:24 am
  • I'm a llama!
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #46 on: October 22, 2004, 06:04:14 pm »
Just a note for those looking into this monitor: I had one delivered last week, and have been using it (just on a desk; cab is still being built) for a few days now with an ArcadeVGA.   It's certainly a bright picture, and when it works, it works very well.  Unfortunately, it looks like it might need to be replaced, for the reasons I described in this thread.

I called their Buena Park office (I'm in the San Diego vicinity) and talked with a tech guy, who was stumped (he didn't seem very famliar with this particular monitor).  He kept saying that there was a known problem with DDR boxes, but he'd heard nothing about this one.  Eventually he transfered me to his boss, who was similarly stumped, and even went so far as to say he didn't think this particular model would work in the setup I described (PC w/ArcadeVGA).  He then transfered me to my sales rep, and I have to wait for her to come in on Monday 10/25 before I find out if they're going to get me a replacement.

It's weird; maybe it's just because they're used to dealing with businesses, not individuals, but everyone I talked to acts like I'm the first person to ever return a defective part.  Yeesh.

Oh, and Kevin, thanks for replying to my e-mail.  I did manage to fix the "tearing" problem with your suggestion, though unfortunately none of the screen controls would fix the geometry problem that I've now encountered.

*sigh* Another day of waiting around for their truck to show up.  Last time their delivery estimate was "sometime before noon", and he showed up at around 3pm, only to rather rudely (he laughed in my face) inform me that he wouldn't help me get the darn thing up the single flight of stairs to my apartment.  I understand that policy is policy, but a) I would have liked to know that before hand, and b) he didn't need to act like I'd suggested he lay an egg.  I'm a big guy, but carrying a monitor this size up a flight of stairs by the shipping straps is not something I relish doing again - time to buy a dolly.

whammoed

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2310
  • Last login:July 18, 2025, 04:29:32 pm
  • Crack don't smoke itself
    • NiceMite
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #47 on: October 22, 2004, 07:35:54 pm »
I was hoping not to hear about any problems with the kortek monitor like we have seen with the WG.  At least WG has great customer support and sends replacements right away.  Oh well, I hope this is an isolated incident.  Good luck. :)  I'm sure if there are a lot of problems we will hear it.  I'd be willing to bet a lot of people will be trying out this monitor since it has Kevin's recomendation.

mwoody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Last login:June 28, 2005, 03:17:24 am
  • I'm a llama!
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #48 on: October 28, 2004, 06:15:28 pm »
New monitor came in; the geometry problems are still present, but now they're certainly within acceptable range.  Boo-yah!  Now, if Slikstik would just hurry up...  Eh, what do I care, I'll be doing nothing but GTA:SA for the next week, anyway.  :D

KevSteele

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 941
  • Last login:January 20, 2025, 11:29:37 am
  • Retrogaming Media Mogul in Rehab
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #49 on: October 28, 2004, 07:50:46 pm »
Glad to hear the geometry problems are acceptable!

From what I can see, the Betson can do 800x600, but it's not as good as a PC's 800x600. Lower resolutions are great, but I have noticed a bit of the "warping" or "squishing" on the edges at 800x600 (not bad on my monitor, but I bet it varies from unit to unit.)

I've been playing around today with the new Ultimarc AVGA card (the one based on the ATI 9200SE chipset)...in a word: WOW...sharp picture, vivid color, and more than acceptable 3D acceleration speed. Not to mention it no longer tries to install the ATI drivers by default, nor crashes after doing so. This is a very cool card...

Kevin
Kevin Steele, Former Editor and Publisher of RetroBlast! and GameRoom Magazine

Will

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 281
  • Last login:April 08, 2012, 03:32:27 am
  • Finished Lurking.....
Re:Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #50 on: October 29, 2004, 04:49:58 pm »
Anyone know the part# for this monitor in a 25 inch version(25 inch viewable)?I called betson west(south san francisco) to see about ordering it in 25 inch but the guy in parts said he carried a different brand in that size and not the betson multisync.I currently have a wg 25 inch monitor that needs some work and im thinking about dumping it and getting something newer.

telengard

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 784
  • Last login:Yesterday at 10:56:55 am
  • Yeah, it's a classic! 21+ on BYOAC and still goin
    • S T U R C A D E
Re: Retroblast Review of Betson Imperal Monitor
« Reply #51 on: February 17, 2005, 01:29:35 am »
Hate to dig up an old post but I never did update the thread with what I found out.  After calling casinotech they told me that a 19" version is *not* available.  So I'm on to looking for something else.   :(
S T U R C A D E     M.A.M.E. Cabinet
http://www.briansturk.com/mame.html