Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Which emulator should I use for mostly fighters?  (Read 873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tshizzle.com

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
  • Last login:January 07, 2005, 01:38:05 pm
  • I'm a llama!
    • tshizzle.com
Which emulator should I use for mostly fighters?
« on: August 26, 2004, 11:27:28 am »
Is there a mame-type out there thats better than just normal MAME for mostly newer game emulation?  I've tried a few, ADVmame, mame32, etc, but havent really noticed much difference.  I see people talking about Kawaks (sp?) alot, what do some of you gurus use to run newer roms (2d fighters, KI, Metal Slug types, etc, mostly the games Ill be playing in my cabinet) ?  Thanks

Darkstalker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 356
  • Last login:June 27, 2010, 12:55:36 am
  • A legend in my spare time...
Re:Which emulator should I use for mostly fighters?
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2004, 12:30:13 pm »
Well, it depends.  MAME will cover pretty much all of your bases...BUT...MAME is more about accuracy than playability.  That means most of your newer games will run accurate to the standup, but in some cases too slow to be playable.

"I've tried a few, ADVmame, mame32, etc, but havent really noticed much difference."

The reason you don't see a difference between ADVmame/mame32/xmame/etc. is the fact that they all share basically the same driver set, and it's usually features that change (OS support, input/output advanced options).  Essentially they are re-distributable custom compiles based off of the same MAME source code, hence the similarity.

"I see people talking about Kawaks (sp?) alot, what do some of you gurus use to run newer roms (2d fighters, KI, Metal Slug types, etc, mostly the games Ill be playing in my cabinet) ?"

Kawaks is a CPS1/2 and NeoGeo emulator.  The goal for that emulator is more focused on playability, and will make resonable sacrifices in the drivers to ensure faster execution (Even though there is code sharing between emus).  There's a number of emulators out there for everything, but I would stick to Kawaks for the CPS1/2 and NeoGeo based games.  I can't think of anything recent off the top of my head, fighting game wise, that you would miss out by excluding MAME.
Still in the collecting parts and ideas phase of cabinet building.

TalkingOctopus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Last login:July 20, 2025, 03:56:38 am
  • @!#?@!
    • My Arcade
Re:Which emulator should I use for mostly fighters?
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2004, 05:01:53 pm »
NoNameMame and MamePlus have command.dat support which is useful for fighters.  The command.dat is a list of moves for each fighter that can be brought up from the tab menu.  You may want to check that out.