Really? I hope it is the bad pictures that make the stippling look so bad then. It looks like the atomic artwork is sinking in the mud. It's hard to even make out the electron trails.
I was a bit worried about that myself, but I'll take Santoro's word that they look good in person. We lowered the depth of the electron trails to make the electrons stand out more, and I don't think we were thinking of how close they would be to the stippling...
On a side note, my daughter saw the token and asked, "Why are there two electrons on each orbit? Shouldn't there only be one?" She just turned ten. TEN. I'm so proud... <sniff>
Odd that they would forget the dentils. Now the design is changed to have the dentils and then there are no dentils
Allthough I feel it does make the design look cleaner when you have some extra white (or is that brass?) space.
The extra space isn't horrible, but if they would have said we couldn't have dentils I would have moved the text a bit farther from the circle.
It's worth noting, however, that I've looked at a lot of arcade tokens lately... I have several at home. None are as complex or as detailed as ours, and ours looks much sharper! The guys at TokensDirect really did a bang-up job on these; they're far better than the Hoffman Mint ones many arcades use, and a bit sharper than the Roger Williams Mint. I am very impressed, and that's from the photos; as Santoro says, I'm sure they're even better in person.
--Chris