paigeoliver,
Of course it's not screen printed! Can you imagine the cost of a custom one-up silk screen?
No one ever said they were screen printed. It's a fantastic print, done on a durable media. The process used, whatever it is, produces extremely smooth, sharp, colorful prints. That's all I asked for.
Kevin
I think what PO is inferring is that their marketing stuff seems to be designed to make it appear to the uninformed as though their products aren't created on inkjets. Would it have been so bad to say that they use pigmented ink in their high-end inkjet rather than dye used by others and let the customer decide if that's necessary or even a good thing for their application?
Also, as someone already pointed out, the example from the site doesn't appear to be a real sample, rather a plain old CG. Why not show real work? If it's really that good the image will speak for itself.
Here are some facts from someone who has been around this stuff for a while...
1: A great print is a great print. Period. Not all content requires that latest gazillion dollar printer to do properly. If you are happy with what you have, that is the most important thing.
2: For photo quality stuff, dye based inks on a good inkjet still give the best bang for buck.
3: Pigmented inks give better longevity, but are still prone to fading. Much depends on the environment when issues of durability are considered. UV resistant lamination can also add an extra bit of protection. Remember, even paint will fade eventually. "Never fade" claims are unrealistic at best.
4: Pigmented inks also have a reduced color gamut (range). There are quite a few colors achievable with dye based inks that are not achievable with pigmented inks.
5: Image quality has to do with many things. These things include the quality of the source file, ink, printer, RIP (Raster-Image-Processor),
MEDIA and finally operator skill. Any or all of these things can adversely affect the quality of the final image.
Please understand, I am not making any statements as to the quality of the work discussed here, as I haven't seen it up close. Just trying to help make sure that certain "industry known" facts are understood by those who may not have the background to evaulate some statements properly.
FWIW,
RandyT