quick recap of all the posts:
I show an example of a player staying in the rules who should have been punished in contrast to what ballard did. I say sapp is a real butthole because he did something within the rules with intent to hurt while ballard did something on accident.
You reply sapps a butthole and they changed the rules because of him.
My point was people who do crap in the rules to hurt someone on purpose should be punished.
I think your point is the NHL should make a rule that you cant hit your own goalie with a stick
I reiterate my point and ask if you were mad he hit his goalie or broke his stick.
You don’t answer my question then say there’s no rule against breaking your stick. Then you say the team should suspend him.
I point out your contradictions in the rules. Then I try to reiterate the difference between going out of the way to hurt someone and doing it on accident. I ask why you chastise the guy
You agree its forgivable but say he needs to be punished, say image and team is important. And say if hes breaking a rule that doesnt exist hes breaking the rule (I don’t quite get it)
*****I do acknowledge there is no provision for intent, but that’s where commissioners and everything get involved. 2 people can do similar things but under the circumstance and taking player reps into account they can have very different penalties ******
I say he doesn’t need punished, because he has to live with what he did. I retort on team image and team mates. I watched the interviews, they seemed genuine
you say punishment is to deter others from hitting their goalies in the face with a stick. You imply I'm a sports reporter, then you imply that if I were a sports reporter Id be wasting my time because no athlete ever tells the truth to any of them.
*****My point all of this was that they don’t need a rule to tell a player to not hit a team mate with a stick and that the guy shouldnt be punished by the league. Now if the Pathers wanna sit him for a game or two to make a point, that’s within their rights, but it’s pointless to make an example of a guy who made a mistake and seems genuinely sorry for it.*****
back to the recap:
I call you an ---uvula---, because , you are acting like one; cant help, seems you cant either. I tell you once again the guy did it on accident and that his team mates should accept it and move on. I then made a quip about how yeah I interviewed the players personally and say if the players hold a grudge its that players issue not ballards or vokouns.
I ask you what you issue with Ballard is.
you have a hissy fit and don’t answer, again.
@Shardian I agree that'd definitely be one way to curb this kinda crap from happening again.
done headbanging? A debate is when someone makes a point and you address it then counterpoint. Try harder