Point taken, but he still has only seen less than $40 mil of the $130 million so far. (2005 salary $600,000, 2006 salary $1,400,000) That still leaves almost 70% of his contract left to go. To me, that's pretty backloaded. A $2.5 mil loan still doesn't strike me as that odd.
HooPZ - I think you were taking my analogy a little too literally. It's not *exactly* like buying on margin. Lemme put it another way. My wife bought a car a few years back, and was able to get 1.9% financing on it. We put the minimum down, and are not making any payments ahead of time, even though we could have bought the car outright. We make more than 1.9% on that money just sitting in an ING account, so at the end of it all, we are better off financially by having the loan.
I won't pretend to know Vick's investment portfolio, or the real interest rate he is being charged, but it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to think that he's got a smaller percentage of his money (say, $2.5 million worth) in investments that are yielding more than 9%. Shoot, most of my stock picks so far this year are well into double digit returns.
And we all know that it's not Mike or his agent that obtained that loan, it's his accountant.