Also, how are tubes made without pixel lines?
They're not. Believe it or not, they use the same kind of tube. The tube that goes to my K4900 (19VLTP22) also goes on a K6400.
Huuuuuuhhhhhh !?!?!? I always thought that the CRT was very different ! I thought there was just one layer of phospor on the screen, without "dots" and that the ray lit up just that spot of the screen that it hits. AFAIK oscilloscopes work like that ?
Come to think about it, this could only be true for B/W vectors. Color vectors of course require three guns, each "hitting" the right colored dots on the screen.....hmmm. So why on earth is no-one building a board-set to convert a conventional monitor (CRT) to a vector ? I guess it must be the yoke preventing this from being possible ?
I've also read somewhere that with some hacking, it is possible to use a regular TV (monitor) as an oscilloscope (with a very limited bandwidth, but I have no clue what bandwidth an arcade vector would require).
To Rick and Nick: So you've got the skills AND lots of experience with designing/producing vector monitors ! What a shame not start-up a line of vectors......you'll be the only busines in the world making them, think about it

There's also a lot of "added value" because the old vectors are becoming rare and worn-out....AND think of a brand new market ! If I could buy a reliable brand-new vector now, I would also invest in a Zektor-vector right away and finaly built that MAME-vector cab

! You could team-up with the Zektor vector guys as well and sell it as a kit ? The Zektor-vector could even be built-in straight in the monitor

!
Maybe I'm on a pink cloud, but imagine, you could be the saviours of the vectors

I think that's Nobel-prize stuff
Thinking about it: we are now about 20 years further in time. Wouldn't there be more reliable components now ? Wouldn't it be possibel to include IC's that are used f.i. in oscilloscopes to use less parts compared to then (check out the difference in number of components on the 25 year old monitors with now) ?