I have read though, that even though it supports the lower frequencies, it will still not look as good as an arcade monitor because it was designed for a much higher resolution. What are your thoughts on this?
What we are talking about here is basically "dot pitch". which is typically used to refer to the size of the individual "dots" that can be shown on a monitor. (Technically its the distance between the sub-pixels of the same colour). Crudely put, this is how much detail a monitor can show within a cetain area....
So with PC monitors or LCD's, which have a very small (i.e. fine) dot pitch - e.g. 0.25mm - they can show up far more detail than an old arcade monitor, and hence it looks blocky and bad compared to the arcade original.
Typical CRT (not-LCD/Plasma) TV's and arcade monitors would have a dot pitch of anything from 0.60mm to 0.90mm. so they can draw much less detail in a certain area, and look great with arcade games.
Some info here:
http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_crtfaq.html#CRTFAQ_011And for comparision, Retroblasts review of a new, top-end 29" 15-50Khz Wei-Ya Arcade monitor has a dot pitch of 0.68mm.
http://www.retroblast.com/reviews/weiya.htmlThe NEC XM29 has a dot pitch of 0.60mm, so I reckon should be fine.
It's probably fair to say that as it does have a 28" screen that is capable of (very good) 1024x768 display it is going to be sharper that a 2nd hand 19" arcade monitor, but you are getting the best of both worlds. (IMHO).