I am agree with you. We need a new version of nonamemame (and nonamemame32, of course) or mameanalog+(also with the mame32 version).
Advancemame is very dependent of the hardware you have to configure the video. And it misses other features like streech hardware (i think) and some filters like triple buffering, etc...
I am trying to configure properly for two months the video, to play with the correct resolution and correct frame rate. Of course I use windowsXP, the most abandon version of advancemame.
Anyway, the question is: Why MameDev Team don't want to include the raw input for Windows 98 and XP into the regural version of mame windows?
PD.- Doc, I built a cab based in your incredible work!