Now, I'm not a fan of his... but he takes it upon himself to find a boat, get his ass down there, and help the people directly, and idiots here are criticizing that he had a photographer?
Isn't that still helping people who desperately needed immediate help?
It's similar to the idiots complaining that Bush shouldn't have showed up after some disaster because the security and "entourage" he HAD to have with him only hampered efforts.
Penn didn't require an entourage like a President does. Sure, it's one additional person, but when you're dealing with a boat as small as he was using, you don't see it as completely unnecessary to have that person along, and in fact, only hindering the aid of MORE people than he's currently doing?
The opportunity for a photo-op, as shmokes said, is what this entire thing looks like, and to me, a photo-op that causes less aid to be carried out IS something to be criticized.
If your house was on fire and Sean Penn was coming to help you, would you want him to take your kid out because his photographer was taking up space your wife could have used, or would you want him to leave the photo-op photog sitting in the truck while he saved your kid AND your wife?
If your gripe is because his "priorities" are somewhat in line because he's helping others, then priority #1 would be to scratch the photographer as boat passenger #whatever, because saving some guy with a camera who was perfectly fine while standing on dry land is priority number.....shite, I can't comprehend the number large enough that would give adequate weight to how insignificant that photographer's use is in this situation.