Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Car insurance weirdness.  (Read 1502 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Car insurance weirdness.
« on: July 11, 2005, 03:56:09 am »

If I own just my Suburban than my insurance is like $600 a year.

If I own my Suburban and say a Ford Escort my insurance goes up to $1200 a year.

But if I own my Suburban, a motorcycle and a freaking motorhome my insurance is only $825 a year. What is up with that anyway? I can't afford to insure 2 traditional vehicles at the same time, but apparently I can insure an entire fleet of nontraditional vehicles less than the price of a second car.

Even if I didn't want a motorhome for recreational or residential usage it would STILL be cheaper (even with the 6 miles per gallon) to keep one as a backup vehicle instead of a compact car.

I could actually insure 2 motorhomes and 4 motorcyles for the price of ONE extra car.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

Stingray

  • Official Slacker - I promise to try a lot less
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10463
  • Last login:April 08, 2021, 03:43:54 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2005, 03:19:55 pm »
I expect that's just it. A motorcycle and a motorhome are vehicles that the insurance company see as recreational vehicles. They think you are only going to have them on the road occasionaly, and therefore see them as a lower risk. The Suburban and the Escort they see as cars that will get daily use, will be on the road nearly every day of the year, and have a higher probability of being involved in an accident.

I'm not saying that is or is not how you will use the vehicles, it's just how the  insurance company thinks you're going to use them.

-S
Stingray you magnificent bastard!
This place is dead lately.  Stingray scare everyone off?

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2005, 03:37:55 pm »
It's about how much it will cost if you wreck the Escort.  In the Escort, if you so much as hit a parking meter, you're looking at 3 months in ICU.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2005, 06:18:55 pm »
It's about how much it will cost if you wreck the Escort.  In the Escort, if you so much as hit a parking meter, you're looking at 3 months in ICU.

Um, I don't get full coverage, I only get liability, so it only pays for damage I cause to other people/cars and not to myself.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2005, 07:59:00 pm »
You are right about one thing, small motorcycles not causing any damage in accidents. Last week I had a truck pull out in front of me and then immediately STOP. I hit him, no damage to me, no damage to my bike, no damage to his truck.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

Bones

  • [Moderator]
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3995
  • Last login:July 26, 2021, 11:34:03 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2005, 08:02:42 pm »
Consider yourself lucky. A run in with any vehicle let alone a truck, is normally gunna end bad.

Living the delusional lifestyle.

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2005, 09:17:39 pm »
Consider yourself lucky. A run in with any vehicle let alone a truck, is normally gunna end bad.

It was fairly low speed, I was aware of everything, I saw I had two options, skid into him and hit him straight on at low speed, or try to dodge right into the ditch.

I opted to hit him, as the ditch had more potential for damage as it could have flipped me, or caused me to impact him at an angle. Had it been higher speed then I would have taken my chances with the ditch.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2005, 09:44:13 am »
Hey, there's accident #1 already.  You're well on your way to being an amputee. 

Zakk

  • Gosh, that's a real nice... ooh look, a penny! -- That Zakk is Just Mean
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2472
  • Last login:Today at 11:27:35 am
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2005, 10:25:20 am »
Hmm, with the motorhome is teh difference made up in that you have to also get home or contents insurance?
Back for nostalgia, based on nostalgia.

Jabba

  • D-Hutt
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1643
  • Last login:November 16, 2020, 02:17:20 pm
  • I find your lack of faith...disturbing...
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2005, 10:42:32 am »
Vids:  Home built MAME machine, Crystal Castles. Arkanoid
Pins:   Williams Aztec (working). Stern Nugent (not working...yet), Williams Phoenix (major not working, missing parts.... )

Always on the lookout for buying 90's game with Ramps that need work...

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2005, 01:57:23 pm »
Hmm, with the motorhome is teh difference made up in that you have to also get home or contents insurance?

paigeoliver

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10994
  • Last login:July 06, 2024, 08:43:49 pm
  • Awesome face!
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2005, 06:39:36 pm »
I ensured my motorhome as a vehicle and not as a residence. Just got liabilitiy, did not insure the contents.
Acceptance of Zen philosophy is marred slightly by the nagging thought that if all things are interconnected, then all things must be in some way involved with Pauly Shore.

ChadTower

  • Chief Kicker - Nobody's perfect, including me. Fantastic body.
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38212
  • Last login:June 22, 2025, 04:57:38 pm
Re: Car insurance weirdness.
« Reply #12 on: July 12, 2005, 10:03:34 pm »
Wow, I see people using insure and ensure interchangeably all the time, but never both of them in the same paragraph.    :laugh: