SLOGANS
Okay, I think I'm getting a small hint here that not everyone appreciates the esthetics of "GOOD FOR EXTENDED PLAY". Since Santoro is busy gathering opinions on other aspects of the token, I'm going to step in and suggest a path.
I've gathered up all the slogans I could find across these threads; there are 28 of them.
Before I go any further, I am going to use this assumption: the designs that have been recently "blinged" are the final designs, with the exception of color, stippling, and the text on the bottom of the back of the coin. Thus, the text on the bottom of the back is the only element that is still wide open.
I know that this is not yet true, however making this assumption makes this task easier, as it limits us to debating one single line of text that will fit into the available space.
My proposal is that first I plug all of the slogans into my mockup to see which fit. Any that don't fit are eliminated.
On the remaining choices, we vote. Each person votes for three choices. Tomorrow afternoon, we count up the votes, and eliminate the bottom half and start over. At some point we should get to a reasonable number for a final vote, so a final slogan is picked by Monday so we can get underway.
(EDIT: Added latecoming slogans)
(EDIT: Missed one)
The 32 (seriously presented) slogans I found, in alphabetical order, are:
1 TOKEN (INFINITY SYMBOL) PLAYS
1 TOKEN 1 PLAY
1984
ARCADE GAMES FOREVER
BETTER LIVING THROUGH GAMING
BUILDING YOUR MEMORIES
COIN UP AND PLAY
CONTINUE GAME
FREE GAME
FREE GAME TOKEN
FUN IS FOREVER
GAME NOT OVER
GAME ON
GAME OVER.. NOT
GIVE ME CREDITS OR GIVE ME DEATH
GOOD FOR 1 CREDIT
GOOD FOR 1 GAME
GOOD FOR EXTENDED PLAY
KEEPING MEMORIES ALIVE
LET THE GAMES BEGIN
NOW GO PLAY SOMETHING
ONE COIN AT A TIME
ONE CREDIT
PLAY HARD
PLAY ONE CLASSIC
RESURRECTING THE PAST
STEP UP TO REAL GAMING EXCITEMENT
THE ADVENTURE BEGINS
THE GAME IS NEVER OVER
THE GAME IS NOT OVER
THE GAMES LIVE ON
WHERE THE GAME NEVER ENDS
I am now starting to determine which will fit and wich won't. I'll post my results soon.
Does anyone disagree with this method?
--Chris