Hey everyone, thank you for all the incredible information. I have learned so much over the past few months from your posts!
As stated in other posts, I have two type of CRTs I am working with in my quest for near-native quality. First is a collection of NTSC-only Sony Trinitron TVs with component inputs, connected to a TC1600 transcoder, and VGA-DVI adapter on the PC, connected to an ATI HD 4650. The second option is an SVGA 22-inch CRT monitor, connected directly to the VGA-DVI adapter.
When I have connected the television directly, running GroovyMAME 148u5 and trying the various NTSC crt spec lines, I have interlaced displays for the Windows desktop at 640x480. GM does a decent job displaying resolutions around 240 lines, which I can get centered and look reasonable. Depending on the TV, I think the focus may need to be adjusted, as the images are not very sharp. But running any image which is interlaced (480 lines), or above 244 lines (like R-type or MK) result in various levels of "acceptable loss", where the number of lines must be cut off equally on top or bottom, or adjusting the service menu controls to shift the picture up or down.
I have had excellent results using the SVGA monitor and the suggested specs provided by Calamity to double frequencies. This has allowed me to display ANY game (horizontal or vertical) perfectly on the SVGA CRT, with hardware scanlines, and all perfectly centered. It is SO refreshing not to be tinkering with spec lines and disappointment from the NTSC TV. They take up so much space, and I do feel disappointed they don't have the flexibility of SCART or PAL/NTSC televisions posted by others here.
So my question is whether others have solved the dilemma with NTSC-only TVs to their satisfaction? If you are using an NTSC-only TV for your cabinet (or just on the desk), how are you adjusting your specs or other means to compensate for the line / geometry limitations on these sets?
Thank you!