June 21, 2025, 10:05:24 am
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Muahahha. I'm more evil.
Quote from: danny_galaga on August 31, 2012, 09:15:59 pmIncidentally, apparently '666' is a mistranslation as the Hebrew numbering system was quite primitive. In deicmal, it's supposed to come out to 660 or summink. Don't repeat nonsense like that if you expect anyone to take you seriously.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast
Incidentally, apparently '666' is a mistranslation as the Hebrew numbering system was quite primitive. In deicmal, it's supposed to come out to 660 or summink.
Quote from: pinballjim on September 01, 2012, 01:57:11 pmQuote from: danny_galaga on August 31, 2012, 09:15:59 pmIncidentally, apparently '666' is a mistranslation as the Hebrew numbering system was quite primitive. In deicmal, it's supposed to come out to 660 or summink. Don't repeat nonsense like that if you expect anyone to take you seriously.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_BeastOops, 616. My bad.
Quote from: danny_galaga on September 01, 2012, 11:32:15 pmQuote from: pinballjim on September 01, 2012, 01:57:11 pmQuote from: danny_galaga on August 31, 2012, 09:15:59 pmIncidentally, apparently '666' is a mistranslation as the Hebrew numbering system was quite primitive. In deicmal, it's supposed to come out to 660 or summink. Don't repeat nonsense like that if you expect anyone to take you seriously.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_BeastOops, 616. My bad.From that article it seems more people think it's the triple 6.
Quote from: trekking95 on September 02, 2012, 07:06:53 pmQuote from: danny_galaga on September 01, 2012, 11:32:15 pmQuote from: pinballjim on September 01, 2012, 01:57:11 pmQuote from: danny_galaga on August 31, 2012, 09:15:59 pmIncidentally, apparently '666' is a mistranslation as the Hebrew numbering system was quite primitive. In deicmal, it's supposed to come out to 660 or summink. Don't repeat nonsense like that if you expect anyone to take you seriously.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_BeastOops, 616. My bad.From that article it seems more people think it's the triple 6.Also, from that article, it would appear that the oldest manuscript existing has it as 616. It seems more likely that the older one is more likely to be right, and less likely that somehow, the older authors got it wrong, but the newer authors got it right...
It's hard to say, the original meaning can and will get lost in the translation. Though it doesn't really matter if it's triple 6 or 616, we can't change what it is.
Quote from: trekking95 on September 03, 2012, 04:27:39 amIt's hard to say, the original meaning can and will get lost in the translation. Though it doesn't really matter if it's triple 6 or 616, we can't change what it is.Which is nothing.But, in the spirit of things.....
I once bought a box of condoms at a grocery store and it came to $6.66. That made me smile.
What is nothing, the number? Saying that you can't change what it is doesn't make it anything, that's reading into stuff too much. Just because the Quran is nothing (Yes, I said it) doesn't mean that you are making it something by saying the name can't be changed. Please don't start a overly religious discussion by reading between the lines.
So my WMP visualization came up with this tonight.
Quote from: Gray_Area on September 13, 2012, 12:08:18 amSo my WMP visualization came up with this tonight.two penises and a seven pointed star?