You keep bringing up "racing simulation" like I said it or even implied anything about simulation games. I didn't, not even once.
It seemed like it was implied because I thought you were hinting the game's accuracy as a true 'racing' game.
I personally find simulation games to be utter crap....
Well, there are some good simulation games, but I have tried a few out and they do have the same issue in that after the initial ooo's and ahhh's, the novelty wears off.
It had nothing to do about doing laps around a track or specific gimmicks tacked on, it had to do with Crazy Taxi screwing up everything fun about a game with a car involved
I guess that is your personal opinion. There are many people that enjoy the game. At first I didn't (want) to buy into the hype. But I tried it out and found it to be pretty darn good.
Note that I said my favorite two racing games are Outrun and the new Outrun(s)..... those are arcade racers, you don't do laps, they aren't simulations.
Well, Outrun is a great game and was one of the first racing games I got into simply because you don't do laps.
..... the problem I have is with crazy taxi in particular.
Anyone who enjoys a game in which you are IN A CAR and yet your mission is to STOP DEAD AND WAIT....... MULTIPLE TIMES before time runs out.... well I just don't know about them. Words can't describe. I mean it. You keep mentioning racing simulations... CT seems pretty darn close to a PARKING SIMULATION to me.
I don't recall too much 'waiting'. You stop to pick someone up...drive to a destination and then drop them off. Rinse and repeat. I mean it is a TAXI, right?
And please please don't compare chase hq to crazy taxi. Chase H.Q. is fun. Why? Because you don't stop!!! Plus chasing down the bad guy is exciting and awesome.... picking up cab fares... umm well.
I used them in the same sentence because I like the two games equally the same.
I bet it has to do with the dreaded "dreamcast-itis" I hear about where some people think that the DC is the console equivelent of Jesus and that all games on the console were superior to everything. I hate to burst the bubble, but the dreamcast had a ton of clunkers and predictably most of the clunkers were first-party games.
No it isn't a case of Dreamcast-itis. I still think my Playstation 2 is superior, but the Dreamcast does shine in regard to various arcade ports.
I primarily became interested in the Dreamcast because I was looking into a consistent means of controlling several driving games using a single set of controls. With Mame this is pretty hard to do, especially when it comes to mapping shifters.
.. but come on man, bashing other racing games while calling one that at best would be considered "pretty good" and at worst "utter garbage" a masterpiece??? If you would have said "I like Crazy Taxi" or even "Crazy Taxi is my Favorite game" I wouldn't have even put my hands to the keyboard... but masterpiece??
Thems' fightin' words pilgrim
Ok, so you made your point that you don't like Crazy Taxi. Perhaps I shouldn't have used the words masterpiece and racing in the same sentence. Bad move on my part, OK. But still I feel that this shouldn't be blown out of proportion just by saying one wrong word.
Edit: While looking up some information on the Dreamcast it seems that Crazy Taxi was the third best selling game made for the Dreamcast. That is #3 out of 720 games made for the console. Thus in the context of Dreamcast games, perhaps it WAS a masterpiece.
At any rate, I would just like to drop it and get back to the topic on hand.
whats the point of arguing personal opinion. the guy thinks the game is great, leave him be. i'm sure there's plenty of games you think are masterpieces that lots of others don't hold in such high regard.
Thank You. I can understand that if I made a specific topic (based on racers) and screamed out "I think Crazy Taxi is a racing Masterpiece", that would be asking for trouble and opinions would fly all over the place. But, here I just mentioned it as a side note in regards to some issues I was having with NullDC and the control configuration. Next thing I know everything gets blown out of proportion because I said one word that didn't sit right with someone else? So now I have to tread water and watch every little thing I say? Naw, I have seen this happen too many times with threads that had good info on it.
Ok, 'nuff said, done deal...lets please get back on the topic.
Jukingeo, if you can figure out the shoulder buttons, do this in Crazy Taxi- On the character select screen, hit both shoulder buttons at the same time, 3 times. Then select a character (",)
Yes, I used Crazy Taxi as a 'model' and used it's configuration page to create a suitable keyboard map. I then compared this to mappings used in other driving games such as Daytona, 4x4 Thunder, Hydro Thunder, etc.
I am mainly looking for a consistency with the mappings so I can see if a fixed set of controls could be used for Dreamcast games.
I love Crazy Taxi, but I have to admit that I have played it on NullDC, and I went back to playing it on the actual DC.
You see there are many many benefits to having a X Arcade system, one of them is not having to mess with the control mapping 
Nothing like playing a game on its intended platform. 
Well, overall I was leaning towards a computer using NullDC, but I have noticed that many games did have 'slow down' in at least some part of the game play. With Crazy Taxi it isn't that bad as it only happens in a few graphic intense places. It happens more often with Daytona though.
Granted even though I have an i5 machine I am using the built in graphics accelerator. I am sure that with a better graphics card things would improve. Also going with an solid state hard drive would improve things as well.
I think in the end it will become a choice between project cost vs performance vs whether I want to swap out discs.
Since I am only interested in a handful of games for the Dreamcast (at the moment), going with original hardware could still prove to be the cheapest route. But in the long run I do question the longevity of the disc drive in the Dreamcast. Once that fails the console is useless. Whereas that isn't a concern about a computer running NullDC. But it is the more expensive route to take.
Geo