Personally, I find there to be a significant difference between "kid's game" and "kid-friendly game", of which I think Kirby falls in the latter. They're much like an animated Disney film; adults and children can appreciate them equally for completely different reasons. On the other hand, "Kid's games" would be strictly for the tykes, and usually try to teach some sort of lesson (either subtly or blatantly). Examples would include "Putt-Putt", "Pajama Sam", "Barney's Hide and Seek", etc.
Bottom-line: There's nothing wrong with enjoying "kid-friendly" games as an adult much in the same way there's nothing wrong with watching "Finding Nemo" as an adult.
Kirby is 50 bucks. It has less than 2 hours worth of gameplay and ZERO replay value. When someone asks "Is this a kids game?" They aren't asking if it's ok for them to play it if they buy it for their kids, they are asking if it's a good game for a child-less adult to play and/or purchase.
As I've already stated.. NOT worth a purchase.
Maybe you missed my point. I haven't played the game and have ZERO opinion of it other than the trailers. I was discussing the label "kid's game" that are given to games like this that have cute, cartoony graphics (mentioning the character of Kirby in general as an example) when I think it should be reserved for that stuff DIRECTLY geared at children (usually with an "EC" rating). Kirby games, again in general, are family friendly but not directly marketed to ONLY children. The trailer for the latest Kirby game seemed to be targeted a wider demographic.
Now maybe because of it's easy difficulty and short gameplay, maybe it's suited more towards younger, less-experienced gamers. But I'm sure there's some casual gamers who are older (or too busy for a long, difficult game) and wouldn't mind less of a challenge than, say, New Super Mario Bros. Wii and would resent being labeled a "child" because of it. But I'm not reviewing the game nor was I ever challenging your opinions of same.
To use your own example. Have I, a child-less adult watched nemo? Yes I have, it's an enjoyable film, but only after it came on tv so I didn't have to pay anything. I also won't be spending 30 bucks for nemo on bluray anytime soon.
Do you really live you life worrying that people might think you're 30 years younger than you really are? Why do you need to justify anything? If you were to rent Finding Nemo, would you be concerned that people might look at you crossed-eyed and skip your house when taking their children trick-or-treating?
Personally, I enjoy watching old cartoons while smoking cigarettes and drinking beer. Then I break out a copy of "Castle of Illusion" with Micky Mouse and play it all night. It's good stuff.
