In the last week I've personally read 4 or 5 threads on which are the best emulators. They were all dated from 3 years ago. Which isn't that useful cause my TARDIS went BOOM at the end of last season. The problem is that everyone is convinced that their emulator is the best.

My question is, is there a easy way to compare emulators, Short of going though 2 year old compatibility lists that may or may not have been accurate when they were written, or playing every game in my PS collection all the way though on multiple emus so I can compare the game play and compatibility ect ... you get my point.
Don't get me wrong there are plenty of sites that have recommendations, that may or may not have been updated in a while and/or the methods used to determine "best" are unclear.
http://www.emulator-zone.com/http://nonmess.retrogames.com/http://nonmame.retrogames.com/ I've read that there a couple of console emulators that claim they are "accurate to the clock cycle"!!! Great!!! that's what the type of stuff I'm looking for, but then other emus claim better compatibility ?!?!?!? I'm so confused
Is there a way for a person who doesn't eat, breath and poop code to figure this out for themselves? That way we can preserve the e-environment rather than pollute it with quickly out dated comparison threads
