Why doesn't FF buffer what I type and hold it?
Opera does that
I often page back in the middle of a post, then page forward to go back to my half completed post.
Slightly OT. I used to use Opera almost religiously back in the '98 days. But I ran into a curious problem. Opera had/has a slow memory leak. The longer I left the PC running and the more time I let Opera used during that time, it would eventually mangle the video buffer in some manner. The problem exhibited itself regardless of video card, whether Opera was running (it was cumulative), and didn't seem to affect the operation any other programs except the video portion. Given a configuration with a color depth of say 32bit, Opera would eventually cause the video card to run in 24bit (if supported), then down to 16, 8, 4(?) and eventually straight 2 bit color depth. IIRC It would be about 12 hours worth of Opera time before the problems became noticeable. Anywhere from 24 to 36 before it was all black and white. I chased this problem for months before I figured out it was Opera. Spoke with some coworkers at work who confirmed and verified my findings, all on completely different hardware. Some on some high end gaming rigs, some on off the shelf junk.
I went through the trouble of opening a trouble ticket with the Opera Devs with a complete report of my findings. They wouldn't even give me the time of day. I believe it's because of the amount of time involved to replicate the problem. At the time I thought it was a memory management issue. Now, I'm not so sure. I discovered later that using the zoom feature seemed to exasperate the problem. I was able to reproduce the problem within a couple of hours, instead of days. I discovered that after I opened the trouble ticket.
In any case, I decided I didn't want anything to do with a project that can't get their memory management issues under control. So I jumped ship, floated around a bit until I dropped 98 entirely and went to Linux and started using Konqueror then FF on XP.
Back on topic.
I'm sure it's happened on occasion somewhere in this country, but just like regular theft, it's hard enough to find the culprits, and even if you do, is everyone going to make the connections necessary to figure out it was the posting of information that led to it?
Yeah. I think that's interesting. There is so much talk about
preventing crime and all these studies that try to place the blame on outside influences. Things like economic status, social structure, etc. But I've never seen any study on what
exactly led a person to choose victim X over non-victim Y. Oh wait... I have seen some studies. Things like having a dog in a house makes a person less likely to be a target. Thieves generally hit houses without dogs. What I mean are studies regarding the sequence of events that lead up to the actual robbery.