Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Frogger @ 224x768?????  (Read 5518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zebidee

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3407
  • Last login:Today at 05:40:17 am
Frogger @ 224x768?????
« on: June 14, 2009, 09:57:29 pm »
So, I downloaded that latest mameui32 v0132, and wanted to tweak my settings for Frogger. However, when I opened up the properties to my surprise Mameui32 reports that frogger has a native res of "224x768". Huh? I know that Frogger is meant to run at 224x256. I note If I try to select a res that I typically use for these types of vertical games, and my usual settings, then I get just the middle of the game's screen. Settings like "hardware stretch", "switch resolutions to fit", "enforce aspect ratio" are set properly, and playing with them doesn't help either.

On my standard/CGA-res arcade monitor Frogger is now only playable under 640x480, which is lame.

So, what is happenning here? I've never seen this behavious in earlier versions of Mameui32 or Mame32. Because I don't see heaps of posts complaining about it, my next question is "What am I missing?".


Check out my completed projects!


FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5145
  • Last login:March 07, 2025, 10:44:09 am
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2009, 05:00:36 pm »
You can thank MAME and their quest for authenticity.  I didn't follow the thread too closely on MAMEWORLD but evidently the current resolution IS the correct resolution.  Unfortunately for me,  it's a resolution that goes in to a vertical roll on my cab causing me to adjust,  which then,  of course,  causes a vertical roll for everything else when I exit Frogger.  It's a pain in the ass.... so I just don't play Frogger on my vertical MAME cab...
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

Zebidee

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3407
  • Last login:Today at 05:40:17 am
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2009, 05:33:09 pm »
How does that make any sense? Arcade monitors are not capable of 768 vertical lines. Even with interlacing.

Seemed to me that it was more about convenience as most LCD monitors will do a nice 1024x768, and that this was what Aaron used or something like that. My observation is that Mame devs often don't use arcade monitors.

Anyway, my Frogger (and Galaxian & probably some other games) are now stuffed. Newer is not always better.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2009, 05:35:46 pm by Zebidee »
Check out my completed projects!


Minwah

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7662
  • Last login:January 18, 2019, 05:03:20 am
    • MAMEWAH
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2009, 05:45:44 pm »

dmckean

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 729
  • Last login:January 13, 2024, 08:50:41 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2009, 06:54:40 pm »
You can either compile your own MAME to undo the changes made to frogger or just setup your frontend use two separate versions of MAME. This kind of thing happens all the time with MAME and there's a lot of people with older PCs in cabinets still using version 107.

TOK

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3604
  • Last login:January 24, 2024, 05:14:24 pm
  • The Game Always Wins
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2009, 08:00:51 pm »
Why do the people at mameworld keep upgrading? They say their favorite games won't work on their arcade monitors anymore, so obviously they were working before.  Are they so dumb that they don't know its not mandatory to run the newest version?

Holy crap.  :P

Zebidee

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3407
  • Last login:Today at 05:40:17 am
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2009, 09:40:23 pm »
From my own perspective, I'd rather just run one version of Mame for all my games rather than multipledifferent versions. However, I might just have to bite-the-bullet and setup an old version of Mame for running classics on and make it a separate emulator under MameWAH. *sigh*
Check out my completed projects!


Minwah

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7662
  • Last login:January 18, 2019, 05:03:20 am
    • MAMEWAH
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2009, 06:43:45 am »
However, I might just have to bite-the-bullet and setup an old version of Mame for running classics on and make it a separate emulator under MameWAH. *sigh*

You don't need to...you can use the same 'emulator' in Mamewah but use game-specific ini files for any games you want to run with an alternate version of Mame. Just bung a file named gamename.ini in the \mamewah\config\mame\game folder, and place your alternative commandline in it, eg:

emulator_commandline c:\oldmame\mame.exe frogger

Actually I would replace 'frogger' with '[name]', and then you can just copy this file exactly for any other games you want to run with an alternative Mame version.

I still use Mame v0.99 for most games, but use my ShifterMame (v0.125) build for driving games - setup similarly to above.

massive88

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Last login:February 26, 2024, 02:21:01 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2009, 09:58:41 am »
However, I might just have to bite-the-bullet and setup an old version of Mame for running classics on and make it a separate emulator under MameWAH. *sigh*

You don't need to...you can use the same 'emulator' in Mamewah but use game-specific ini files for any games you want to run with an alternate version of Mame. Just bung a file named gamename.ini in the \mamewah\config\mame\game folder, and place your alternative commandline in it, eg:

emulator_commandline c:\oldmame\mame.exe frogger

Actually I would replace 'frogger' with '[name]', and then you can just copy this file exactly for any other games you want to run with an alternative Mame version.

I still use Mame v0.99 for most games, but use my ShifterMame (v0.125) build for driving games - setup similarly to above.

qft.

I feel its time again to tell you that which you already know Minwah, Mamewah rules.  Thanks for providing such a great and versatile front end.

2600

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1630
  • Last login:June 05, 2017, 10:20:56 am
  • I want my own arcade controls!
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2009, 10:14:43 am »
There is no reason to modify MAME.  You can still run frogger at 224x256.  Either use a command line argument or use an ini file for it.

moonchilddave

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 90
  • Last login:May 17, 2021, 01:21:04 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2009, 11:12:25 am »
Thanks for the suggestion, I never thought of that before!  I'll have to do that since Frogger on .131 on my system suffers from choppy sound - but is fine back on .106.  Can you do the same thing with Daphne (use a game specific ini) as I'd like to run specific settings for the different roms of Dragon's Lair?

massive88

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Last login:February 26, 2024, 02:21:01 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2009, 11:35:11 am »
Thanks for the suggestion, I never thought of that before!  I'll have to do that since Frogger on .131 on my system suffers from choppy sound - but is fine back on .106.  Can you do the same thing with Daphne (use a game specific ini) as I'd like to run specific settings for the different roms of Dragon's Lair?

You can do it with any emulator.

2600

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1630
  • Last login:June 05, 2017, 10:20:56 am
  • I want my own arcade controls!
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2009, 02:04:34 pm »
You can do it with any emulator.

That's a pretty blanket statement.



My statements were for MAME and MAME alone.  In MAME, almost everything is configurable and is configurable to the point where you can have a configuration for every game.

massive88

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Last login:February 26, 2024, 02:21:01 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2009, 02:37:55 pm »
You can do it with any emulator.

That's a pretty blanket statement.


And a true one, in Mamewah you can have specific game ini's under any emulator folder. 

Ive done this for example with Kega to run Sonic CD and have it appear under the same list as the rest of the genesis games, but run off a different emulator.  Same with ZiNC in the mame list, or Demul for Crazy Taxi (must have analog input) under my Dreamcast list.

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5145
  • Last login:March 07, 2025, 10:44:09 am
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2009, 04:08:50 pm »
There is no reason to modify MAME.  You can still run frogger at 224x256.  Either use a command line argument or use an ini file for it.

Nope... if you configure it to run at 224x256 via command line or ini you end up with about 50% of the screen on screen and the rest off...
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

2600

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1630
  • Last login:June 05, 2017, 10:20:56 am
  • I want my own arcade controls!
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2009, 04:27:38 pm »
And a true one, in Mamewah you can have specific game ini's under any emulator folder. 

Ive done this for example with Kega to run Sonic CD and have it appear under the same list as the rest of the genesis games, but run off a different emulator.  Same with ZiNC in the mame list, or Demul for Crazy Taxi (must have analog input) under my Dreamcast list.

I don't think you understand what I am talking about.  I'm not talking about Mamewah settings, I'm talking about MAME settings.

2600

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1630
  • Last login:June 05, 2017, 10:20:56 am
  • I want my own arcade controls!
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2009, 04:29:48 pm »
Nope... if you configure it to run at 224x256 via command line or ini you end up with about 50% of the screen on screen and the rest off...

Hmmm.  Seems to be working for me, but I'm at work right now.  It seems to be ok here, but without being at home I can't 100%.  What other settings do you have?

massive88

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Last login:February 26, 2024, 02:21:01 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2009, 04:53:51 pm »
I don't think you understand what I am talking about.  I'm not talking about Mamewah settings, I'm talking about MAME settings.

And I am, and always have been talking about Mamewah settings.  You quoted me, so I guess you are the one who doesnt understand what I am talking about.

I took Moonchilddave's response to be directed to Minwah's response, since the terminology he used of "game specific ini's" was a direct term from Minwah's post.  Unless Im mistaken, until FrizzleFried, no one was responding to your post.

2600

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1630
  • Last login:June 05, 2017, 10:20:56 am
  • I want my own arcade controls!
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2009, 04:58:00 pm »

And I am, and always have been talking about Mamewah settings.  You quoted me, so I guess you are the one who doesnt understand what I am talking about.

I took Moonchilddave's response to be directed to Minwah's response, since the terminology he used of "game specific ini's" was a direct term from Minwah's post.  Unless Im mistaken, until FrizzleFried, no one was responding to your post.

Ahh.  You are correct sir.

Ummon

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5244
  • Last login:June 09, 2010, 06:37:18 pm
Re: Frogger @ 224x768?????
« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2009, 06:30:50 pm »
This was addressed by SailorSat back then, too. I never tried it, though.

http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=66402.msg837305#msg837305
Yo. Chocolate.


"Theoretical physics has been the most successful and cost-effective in all of science."

Stephen Hawking


People often confuse expressed observations with complaint, ridicule, or - even worse - self-pity.