I understand your entire argument, but you have yet to see the point of my argument. I am not saying NO ONE could use a better chipset on the AVGA. My argument is it is NOT NECESSARY. Big difference.
I do absolutely understand your argument.... I don't actually agree with it.. There's a difference.
I'm not pushing for a PCI-E Card... in fact I haven't said that anywhere. I would however like to see it as an 8X AGP card. I personally think, that has much more life span in it. PCI-E is, as several people have pointed out, already being backtracked on, with manufacturers putting out new boards with high end AGP on them.
Granted that it's going to cost a little more for the new card. But, we're not exactly talking mega bucks here.
While I agree it'd have very little benefit in Mame (at the moment), it would have a huge benefit to any Direct-X Windows Game. That way we get the best of both worlds.
IMHO It wouldn't hurt at all to be moving AVGA up to an X800 on AGP 8X and that's actually a scaleable card that can be stuck on a PCI-E bus as well at next to no additional cost apart from a very basic PCB change.
I'm afraid that your argument that it doesn't necessarily need an upgrade (at the moment) is rather much a non starter...... I suspect that Andy has absolutely no choice about it. 9200 chipsets have not been manufactured for quite a while now...... He has to move onward and upward if he wants to carry on producing AVGA Cards. So really the only question is where to take it to. X800 on AGP 8X ..IMHO makes the most sense (at the moment). Low cost, above mid range performance and maximum compatibility.
In actual fact it makes more sense for Andy to upgrade it (from a business model point of view) Because the more people that can find uses for it, no matter how diverse or nich market those uses are, the more people he can actually sell it to.
Best Regards,
Julian (Fozzy The Bear)