Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: Newby Q'n - ROM backward compatibility  (Read 1008 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

whatisk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 150
  • Last login:March 27, 2017, 06:41:39 am
  • Nothing to see here
Newby Q'n - ROM backward compatibility
« on: April 12, 2005, 09:10:34 pm »
I am working on my first MAME project and was wondering how compatible ROMs are with different versions of MAME.

I have gotten a ROM set 'optimised' for version .95 of MAME. As the PC I'm currently looking at is a Celeron 400 with 192MB RAM, Mame32 .95 runs quite slowly. I've yet to experiment with RAM drives, etc however I was wondering how backwards compatible are ROM sets in general. Could I use them successfully with an older version of MAME that may run on the PC better/faster? Or would I be better off trying to source a ROM set for an older version?
I haven't tried running them with MameWah and Mame as yet, as I've been closely following the thread on people experiencing slow loading with the DOS MAME.

Down the track I will be looking at upgrading the PC (also wanting to turn it into a Visual Pinball, etc machine), but until then, I would like the games to be as playable as possible with hopefully quick load times.
No trees were harmed in the creation of this post. Though several electrons were severely inconvenienced.

sc1103

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 332
  • Last login:December 11, 2020, 08:37:35 pm
  • ......
Re: Newby Q'n - ROM backward compatibility
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2005, 09:28:17 pm »
You may be able to use ClrMAMEPro w/ an older .dat file and an older version of mame to get faster speeds.  Wait for better advice tho from someone like Peale or another smarter more experienced member before doing so. Some roms change, some dont, so u may be able to get away w/ some games, but a few of the classics, im pretty sure, and newer dumps have changed between versions.

EndTwist

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 480
  • Last login:May 26, 2022, 05:04:49 pm
  • Arg.
Re: Newby Q'n - ROM backward compatibility
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2005, 10:17:10 pm »
For the love of god don't use anything above maybe MAME 0.70 on a 400mhz PC. I'm using 0.59 on a P2 450MHz PC for my cocktail! :-X

A number of romsets are backward-compatable (I'm using a 0.70 romset on the 0.59 version of MAME). Obviously some roms in the 0.95 romset won't work on an older MAME, since they were not yet either put in, taken out of TESTDRIVER status, or just non-working roms. Like sc1103 said, play around with ClrMAMEPro a bit, and try some of your roms (in their current state) on an older mame -- some may work, some may not.

Someone else may be able to clarify this more, but hopefully I helped a bit :)

whatisk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 150
  • Last login:March 27, 2017, 06:41:39 am
  • Nothing to see here
Re: Newby Q'n - ROM backward compatibility
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2005, 10:09:49 pm »
Thanks for the replies.

I'll have a look around for an older verison of MAME and test it out.

Luckily though, I scored myself a P4 2.4, 256MB RAM, 40GB HDD at an auction yesterday. So that will now become my MAME PC. Hopefully that way I should be able to stick with .95 with a minimum of fuss. Probably look at making the RAM 512MB some point soon.

Surprisingly, load times don't seem too bad (well, better than I was expecting). Though pretty much anything other than the old shoot 'em ups runs pretty doggedly...
No trees were harmed in the creation of this post. Though several electrons were severely inconvenienced.