Main > Everything Else
Schiavo rumblings
shmokes:
--- Quote from: fredster on March 23, 2005, 01:15:17 pm ---I have to *sigh* Side with Shmokes.
--- End quote ---
OH MY!!!!! Is it too late to change my vote? :P
shmokes:
--- Quote from: Dartful Dodger on March 23, 2005, 11:37:35 am ---Peterson felt his wife had to drown.
Spousal rights to speak for a spouse are not absolute.
--- End quote ---
Darful, seriously.....
Even the people on your side know that your Scott Peterson analogy is retarded. There's no parallel. Even if Scott Peterson's wife had a living will saying that she would not want to live in Terri Shiavo's state there would be no useful analogy that could be drawn. WTF? Are you delusional?
Are you suggesting that Scott Peterson's defense rested not on his innocence, but on his claim that she had expressed her wish to be killed and dumped in the sea?
Dartful Dodger:
--- Quote from: shmokes on March 23, 2005, 07:14:32 pm ---Are you suggesting that Scott Peterson's defense rested not on his innocence, but on his claim that she had expressed her wish to be killed and dumped in the sea?
--- End quote ---
shmokes:
Scott Peterson's case has nothing to do, whatsoever with speaking for your spouse.
It has nothing to do with Guardianship.
It has nothing to do, in fact, with the Terri Shiavo case.
Dartful Dodger:
--- Quote from: shmokes on March 23, 2005, 07:45:24 pm ---Scott Peterson's case has nothing to do, whatsoever with speaking for your spouse.
--- End quote ---
It has EVERYTHING to do with it.
It's easy to see this from the husband