Main > Everything Else
Lost: 380 tons of high explosives - Last seen in Iraq
TA Pilot:
That's in the works...believe me. I not an explosives expert. But I'd like to ask you, if this stuff is proven to be the munitions in question, will that make any difference to you?
I thnk the better question is:
With the million tons of ordnance in Iraq, 400,000 of which we have destroyed, why is this 380 tons that disappeared 18 months ago news?
I'm just going to keep providing the latest evidence, I fully expect you to keep ignoring it. [/]b
And when exculpatory evidence is posted, illustrating that the Bush administration could not have done a thing, you'll admit it - and then make sure the record is corrected.
Right?
That, apparently, is a quesiton you'll have to ask the Bush team.
Excellent cop out. Better than I expected.
--- Quote ---
--- End quote ---
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote from: TA Pilot on October 28, 2004, 01:07:41 pm ---That, apparently, is a quesiton you'll have to ask the Bush team.
Excellent cop out. Better than I expected.
--- End quote ---
You don't find it the least bit ironic that you'd consider the idea of holding a president accountable a cop out? I guess it's denigrating his service to suggest you question him.
Oh btw, I did take this up with Bush and this is the answer he gave me (it's the same answer he gave the troops)
TA Pilot:
You don't find it the least bit ironic that you'd consider the idea of holding a president accountable a cop out?
No.
You cannot descibe how the things that would have had to have happened for your theory to be true.
You then say I have to ask Bush, as if your theory IS true.
Thats a cop-out.
Fact is, the chances of those things happening are so remote, its -impssoible- to imagine (mch less describe) how they could have happened -- and yet, they -all- have to have happened for your theory to be true.
mr.Curmudgeon:
So this whole thing is *my* theory? m'kay...I guess I've just spent too much time living it up in the "reality-based community".
I'm just offering the latest in a string of news items that I happen to hope prove Bush's negligence. I couldn't have imagined something like this happening, but if it did, as implausible as it may seem...if the facts bear out, I will hold Bush responsible. You don't have too, obviously, been then again, you've already acknowledged that you wouldn't. So, *shrug*....
TA Pilot:
So this whole thing is *my* theory? m'kay...I guess I've just spent too much time living it up in the "reality-based community".
You're pushing the theory. You dont agree with it?
I'm just offering the latest in a string of news items that I happen to hope prove Bush's negligence.
And you're offering no explanation for the things that would have to have happened for this to be negligence on Bush's part.
If you're the Iraqi in Charge, why do you wait until the Americans overrun the facility before you decide to get the explosives - when you could have done it, freely, after 15 March?