Main > Everything Else

Die Hard 5: Couldn't Give a F*** trying to make a film anymore Review

<< < (4/8) > >>

yotsuya:
I have to confess that I've never seen any Die Hard movie.

DickTurpin:
I love the Christmasness of the first 2 die hards. Always happens at Christmas. Check them out.
Except 5.

shponglefan:
Die Hard 1 & 3 are great.  Although I think that's mainly because of Alan Rickman and Samuel L Jackson, respectively.  Die Hard 2 is silly, but watchable.  Die Hard 4 & 5 should not have been made, especially as PG-13 movies.

DickTurpin:
I like 1-4 but take your point with 2. But they went way beyond that with 5.
4 is well acted and I think a decent script. I like it. I think I like it a lot more now that i've seen 5. But just the fact that I PAID to watch Die Hard 5 and was expecting it to be good and I watched 4.0 on tv is prob why I hate 5 so much.

Edit:


--- Quote from: shponglefan on July 13, 2013, 06:46:44 pm ---Die Hard 4 & 5 should not have been made, especially as PG-13 movies.

--- End quote ---
That is a very good point that shouldn't be underestimated. Perhaps the use of clearly comic violence got them the PG13 / 12A and the lack of real in your face grit stopped them from making better movies.
I remember when John wacked the guys head on the floor and when he sent him down in the lift. You wouldn't have that in the newer ones. And no one seems to get killed in those 2(4/5).

I tell you I have never held a gun in my life. But if I had a machine gun I think I would at least be better than John and Son  ;)

danny_galaga:

The first is a classic. I've seen the others but honestly can't remember them much, except that the 4th was the silliest...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page