So, I am doing a cocktail cabinet. Maybe even a couple. I have a 60 in 1 on order and that will do fine although I am a little disappointed that the mame version on these is old, that I cannot add more games, and the sound on a few games is junk.
With that said, I started digging for a programmable jamma to see if I could control the games I wanted on them and possibly update the mame version to something at least even remotely current. No dice. Those things are almost $300 and hard to find.
So now I am looking at RP. It seems like it is a decent solution. I have spent some time digging through threads and have seen that a lot of people consider it a little underpowered and premature. Here is my question though... If you are simply comparing it to a 60 in 1 jamma, how does it fare? It seems like it should be comprable as far as processing power goes. If I am just planning on using it for a select number of games, mostly old school verticals and maybe a few horizontal games like asteroids and defender, wouldnt it be a better solution than the 60 in 1 since the mame version is a little more current and you can better control what goes on there?
If you absolutely must pick either one of the two, I would pick a Pi. The Pi, while grossly underpowered can play a hell of a lot more games than just 60 and there are dedicated emulation distros like PiMame that have tons of tools already packed together for you.
As others have mentioned here however, I would prefer to stick with a pentium 4 era box you can probably find for free or dirt cheap. It would emulate much more games than a pi and would only require only a bit more time on the setup.
Then again, you mentioned just one or the other.
I'm also interested in this conversation from an OS standpoint. Those of you running x86 chips are you running windows or do you have a much more dedicated software solution?
Also what about the Android 'stick' computers, they are shipping with 2gb of ram, quad core processors, mini usb and SD cards for under $100
In my opinion, I still think that while linux would give users a more fluid and realistic look in terms of bootup and start times, nothing can beat windows in terms of user friendliness and most importantly, drivers.
I wanted to grab one of the Android sticks for media center ideas too so I'll throw it all in the same bucket of testing.
I'm going to play with a Tronsmart MK908 Quad Core 2GB/8GB set up and see what it's like.
Tronsmart MK908 - $90
Mini-HDMI to VGA adapter - $10
ZD USB Keyboard encoder & wiring- $20
added the extras to the list so we can call it a real alternative for a MAME/CAB set up.
To mirror comments already covered here, an easy-on, non-windows solution, fanless and small but also with the ability to add your own games is really interesting. At the moment the quad core sticks are more expensive at around $90 but they will fall quickly in price so you could consider them more viable in a few months.
Currently a 60 game board with a decent Jamma Harness will cost you approx $75 shipped anyway
The problem with those android and ARM based sticks is that while mame isn't necessarily optimized for a single cpu architecture, mame really isn't optimized for ARM processors.
Not to mentionandroid from a dedicated arcade perspective would require quite a few teaks just to make it look decent. You would not only have to tinker with Android in order to bypass the lockscreen, launcher etc. You would also have to worry about a frontend that would work and look fine on your cab.